In his novella, “The Death of Ivan Ilych,” Leo Tolstoy tells the story of Ivan Ilych and the events leading up to his death. In the being of the novella, Tolstoy describes Ivan Ilych acquaintances discussing his death. They all seem to be glad that it wasn’t them who had died and excited that new job opportunities would come about due to Ilych’s death. One of his colleagues actually goes to his funeral and through this, Tolstoy presents how it seems no one was really saddened by Ilych’s death and the expression on Ilych’s corpse is one of dissatisfaction. Tolstoy then takes the reader back in time to show the events leading up to Ilych’s death being with a brief over view of his early years.
Tolstoy includes several important details in Ilych’s
1. The two sides of the debates in Dostoevsky’s “The Grand Inquisitor” are who can handle freedom the most. Christ gave human beings the freedom to choose weather or not to follow him, but almost no one is strong enough to be faithful and those who are not will be cursed forever. The Grand Inquisitor says that Christ should have given people no choice, and instead taken power and given people no choice, and instead taken power and given people redemption instead of freedom. So that the same people who were to scared to succeed Christ to begin with would still be stuck, but at least they could have joy and security on earth, rather than the impossible burden of moral freedom.
Throughout the novel of The Death of Ivan Ilych, Tolstoy conveys his thematic focus through his unique use of diction. Tolstoy examines several factors that have altered Ivan Ilych’s lifestyle. The only way to enhance our understanding of these factors is to observe how Tolstoy portrays Ivan’s evolving comprehension of what death means to him. Evidently, such portrayal can be thoroughly observed and understood by carefully analyzing Tolstoy’s use of diction. Furthermore, there are several themes that Tolstoy focuses on primarily, which are often associated with the depiction of the human existence as a conflict between different sides of the spectrum and Ivan’s tendency to alienate himself from the world.
Inside the Tiny Shoes What would you do if you were inside the tiny shoes of a seven year old boy getting scolded by the man you looked up to the most? The short story “Home” by Anton Chekhov gives the audience the glimpse of both sides to the story. Yevgeny Petrovitch, a prosecutor and father to Seryozha, comes to realize that his son has been stealing his cigarettes and smoking them at a very young age. Disappointed and confused as what to say, he sits down and tries to talk to the boy, but is constantly reminded of his son’s age. Reading “Home” through a psychoanalytic lens reveals the frail boy named Seryozha to be a childish character, shown by his defense mechanism, psychosexual stage of development, and because of symbols shown.
The novel of “The Death of Ivan Ilyich” is indeed has a social satire theme. At first I believed it was not social satire but, just because this novel was not filled with scenes that will make the audience laugh does not mean it does not show the figurative language of being a satire piece of work. It shows signs of being a “work or manner that blends a critical attitude with humor and wit for improving human institutions or humanity, which inspires a remodeling”. Leo Tolstoy wrote this novel to mock and ridicule the bourgeois class. The author makes a point to pick out the hypocritical lies and being to self-involved in oneself.
Russia’s extremely rich history of the 9th to 13th centuries has led us to recognize prominent leaders of Kievan Rus like Oleg of Novgorod, or Vladimir the Great. But of the many leaders that have ruled over Russian provinces, few are as distinct, complex, and memorable as Ivan the Terrible following the rise of Muscovite Russia. Ivan IV was captivating not only in his conflicting reign, but in his tumultuous personal feelings of paranoia and ruthlessness. For years, Ivan IV has been debated as being identified as either a tyrant or a reformer. It is this extremely fine line between these two identifications that classify Ivan IV as distinctly both a cruel tyrant and an advanced reformer.
The death of Ivan Ilyich, explored by Leo Tolstoy is comparative to the Buddhists concepts of suffering. I shall begin to explain this through breaking down each Buddhist concept of suffering and comparing it to Ivan Ilyich. The first Buddhist concept we learn is from the Four noble truths. “All life is Dukkha” Dukkha is usually interpreted as suffering but is means more then this. It can be referred to the basic fact that something about human existence is ‘out-of-wack’.
Tolstoy’s ability to interweave the environment with themes of materialism and death makes The Death of Ivan Ilych stand out as a piece that criticizes societal values. In his article “Tolstoy and the Moran Instructions of Death,” Dennis Sansom focuses on the influence of fighting chaos in Ivan’s eventual acceptance of his own death. Socrates wrote, “The unexamined life is not worth living,” and Ivan’s life mirrored this until the end (qtd. in Sansom 417) .
The late nineteenth century gave rise to a new literary movement called realism. Realism is the attempt to create an accurate portrayal of life in literature without filter. The movement aims to portray the life of people from all walks of life, but especially of the working class and the poor. Two of the most acclaimed writers from this movement are Leo Tolstoy from Russia, and Guy de Maupassant from France. Their works, “How Much Land Does a Man Need,” and “The Jewels,” respectively, portray the life of two characters from different lifestyles.
Tolstoy portrays to us that Ivan’s life is soon coming to an end by providing us (readers) with many recollections and details from his childhood. Tolstoy also demonstrates how Ivan will die without truly living because he never thought about how death would turn the corner and take him and never lived his own, unique life. Throughout his adulthood, Ivan made choices and completed actions, not for his own sake, but because that is what society accepted, and he wanted to be accepted by society. The details in Ivan’s life are present, but he doesn’t notice those details and goes right along with his work and card games; never showing any emotion towards practically anything in his life.
The "Second Epilogue" of War and Peace extends the discussion of historical causation into the realm of the more general philosophic question of freedom and necessity, a topic which was to retain a vital interest for Tolstoy throughout the remainder of his career. In reading Tolstoy, "freedom" and "necessity" can be understood as rubrics which summarize nearly all of his central thematic concerns. Under "freedom" come consciousness, life, the individual; under "necessity" fall reason (i.e., logic without intuition), death, the group . War and Peace explores the role of the individual within the group conceived of as the historical mass. Here is another unifying factor in the novel, for Tolstoy presents not only the involvement of the historical characters in the great events of history but that of the fictional characters as well.
New ideas flourished within the Golden Age of Russian literature, all of which expanded upon different ways of confronting government, economics, and religion as well as posing various moral, philosophical, and social questions. Fyodor Dostoevsky took part of these literary movements that dated from the early to mid 19th century, which were the result of the hardships he endured from early childhood to most of his adulthood; the troubled life Dostoevsky faced built a foundation of accumulating ideas and resentment that would later cultivate his enlightening social life and literary platform. Dostoevsky experienced peasantry, domestic problems, and social injustice first hand, thus he was able to incorporate themes relating to such in each of
Events that occurred in Dostoevsky’s life unmistakably appear in the plot of Crime and Punishment. By the time the author and character reached adulthood, they had both lost their fathers. The two were raised in Christianity by loving, religious mothers (Pribic). Regardless of the drastically different causes, both men spent time in prison in Siberia ("Fyodor Dostoyevsky - A Writer 's Life). Dostoevsky channeled his memories of imprisonment into his protagonist’s time there.
His life started out with a lot of tragedy when his mother died when he was two years old and his father died seven years after. Eleven months after that his grandmother died, and then his aunt Alessandra died 5 years after. Tolstoy’s most influential guardian was his aunt Tatyana, who played a major role in many of his early works. His first work was Detstvo, which was a fictional work that was based of the tragedies of his early years.
18 Dec. 2014. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/598700/Leo-Tolstoy>.)
The suffrage and torment Tolstoy faced was only fractional in comparison to those of the poor and hungry. Nevertheless, all agony is a serious issue, but Tolstoy would express the grief he felt for living so fortunately while others experienced inconceivable anguish. The incorporation of overwhelming emotion separated this from other endeavors in his life. In his time teaching the youth, Tolstoy was in fact moved in ways, but it did not make his life easier in any way, neither did his own education. He could not find purpose in University, which resulted in his unwillingness to