“Leaders are not born, they are made. And they are made just like anything else, through hard work”. This quote by Vince Lombardi reminds me of my childhood days when I used to argue with my sister by saying how much natural talent she had. Without seeing her hard work and dedication behind her success, I estimated her talent as an inborn quality which helped her score satisfying marks on each school exam. When I grew up, I found myself totally wrong about my view toward my sister, which enhances me to support and appreciate the ideas given by Geoffrey Colvin in his article, “What It Takes To Be Great” about how greatness is achieved. He explains performer in every field requires deliberate practice which is not simple to continue throughout …show more content…
To make my aim come true, I am working on it for so many years. When I was in fifth grade, I read a book of Binod Chaudhary, who is a respected businessman in my country, Nepal. From the day I studied about Chaudhary, I never gave up following my aim. From the fifth grade till my journey to OCC, it has been for more than 10 years and the main reason behind this journey is my targeted aim. Between those 10 years, I have experienced various difficulties along with life lessons about we cannot acquire what we want without hard work. The ten-year rule including practice and hard work has helped me to see where I will be in my future with different kind of experiences. Ten-year rule helped me and will help many of us if applied in life as Colvin suggested. Colvin suggests that open mindset equally plays a role to achieve greatness because it does not matter how hard you work for ten years or more than ten years, the level of success does not improve without open mindset. Mentality makes a difference. Wanting to learn more and having interest in the task help to get better at it. Whereas; if closed mindset stands out against open mindset, then people always remain the same and never get better at the business. “You aren’t just doing the job, you’re explicitly trying to get better at it in the larger sense” (Colvin
Have you heard of the 10,000 hour rule? The 10,000 hour rule, as explained in Malcom Gladwell’s “Outliers”, is when someone practices a total amount of 10,000 hours to achieve a skill. I agree with the rule because when someone practices a skill for that amount of time, they will more than likely be at the mastery level in said skill. As the author stated in the story,“Achievement is talent plus preparation” but does practice really make perfect?
Imagine what it would be like if everyone in the world had a chance to be successful in what they are passionate about just from many amounts of practice. Malcolm Gladwell, the author for the book, The Outliers, mentions an idea named the “ten thousand hour rule”, stating if one practices for many or so hours, he or she evolve closer to success. However, practicing shouldn’t be sponged since practice isn't always the key or easy way in. For example, one can practice for so many years yet never reach that potential. Meanwhile, how many years does it take in order to have a small chance of success?
You have goals set of all of us to become something important. To make a change to the world.
Malcolm Gladwell popularized the idea of 10,000 hours rule in his best sell book “Outliers”. The idea is that 10,000 hours of appropriately guided practice was “ the magic number of greatness ” regardless of a person’s natural aptitude. With enough practice anyone could achieve a level of proficiency that would rival that of a professional, so it was just a matter of putting in the time to become profession in one field. However, there are many people and articles criticize this theory. The article written by Maia Szalavitz which published in the Time magazine and the article written by Eric Levenson both argue about the 10,000 hour rule by using different opinions, but the one on the Time magazine use more academic and scientific tone to criticize the idea, so this article gives a more rigorous feeling to the reader.
Malcolm Gladwell states in Outliers that 10,000 hours of practice in a sport or hobby or career, will propel one person over another. He tries to convince us with his argument by bringing up people like Bill Gates and the Beatles, stating that they spent more than 10,000 hours perfecting their craft. At first his argument seems pretty legit and holds merit, but then you begin to question. What if someone practices for 10,000 hours, but doesn 't put in much work? What if someone, who has spent few hours than 10,000 is excelling?
Is it hard work, or natural born skill? In the chapter “The 10,000 hours rule”, the author claims that in order to become successful in anything, one must put in approximately 10,000 hours of time and practice. In his novel, Outliers,
With these facts, it is used in Gladwell's argument that we decide our destiny. Gladwell then includes psychologist Michael Howe, who explains that Mozart, professional composer, did not make his "masterwork" until he completed ten years of practice. This shows that Mozart's practice affected his work, and that making his practicing benefitted him more when it was at the top of his priorities (Gladwell 12). With Gladwell's strong evidence and research, he builds a higher quality argument of choices affecting our fate rather than natural
Jim Rohn, a motivational speaker, once said, “Success is nothing more than a few simple disciplines, practiced every day.” Malcolm Gladwell’s, Outliers, published in 2008, argues what it means to be successful, and how one can become successful. Gladwell specifically mentions the “10,000 Hour Rule” which states that anyone who wants to reach a definite level of mastery must perform 10,000 hours of practice. Some believe this rule to be invalid as those born talented, are also born successful. Though I recognize that some are born naturally gifted, I still contend that one who wants to become great at what they do, must do supplementary amounts of practicing as it utilizes one’s potential to the fullest as Gladwell argues.
I can understand this, because I used to be a gullible person who believed in everything I read too. They think this because Malcolm Gladwell gave a few examples of “The 10,000 Hour Rule” in his novel, Outliers; in this novel he referred to a few successful faces in society to “prove” his point. The first reason I support this is because some people don’t have any previous experience, giving an “unfair advantage” to the naturally skilled. The author in the article Your Genes Don’t Fit: Why 10,000 Hours of Practice Won’t Make You an Expert notified that he was hopeless. “My brain simply doesn’t work in a way that allows me to write code,” the author articulated.
Argumentative Essay What if the phrase “practice makes perfect” wasn’t actually true? Malcolm Gladwell claims that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to perfect a skill, however, some people are starting to believe that may not be the case. “Your Genes Don’t Fit. Why 10,000 Hours of Practice, Won’t Make You an Expert”, argues that mastering a skill requires innate abilities along with practice.
20 Facts You May Not Have Known About Tom Brady When growing up, a lot of children dream of being the star quarterback. The qb who is Mr. popular in high school, plays at a big time college football program, and then is Superbowl MVP. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.
People learn little from success, but much from failure. In a story by William Steig a little mouse named Doctor De Soto shows the meaning of success and hard work. Doctor De Soto and his wife dodge a not so sly fox. Doctor De Soto and his wife plan ahead to trick a not so sly fox as they knew that the fox would back stab them and try to eat them as a delicious snack , but as the fox thinks he's about to have a delicious snack Doctor De Soto and his wife had a surprise for the fox, they glue the sly ungrateful fox's mouth shut. In this story you would look though and find many Habits of Mind traits, they're 16 different traits in the Habits of Mind including Striving for Accuracy, Thinking Flexibly, and Thinking Interdependently which will be used and explained in the next few paragraphs.
You need to be able to strive towards one main objective and create a path that will support you towards the objective you
Thus, a leader may arise in any field be it politics, social service or sports. A leader possesses both talent and skill. Talent is an innate quality however skill is a proficiency which can be gained through rigorous persistence, training and experience. Leadership is nothing about seniority or one’s rank in a
However, this does not mean that it is the only factor which can lead to success and make people masters in their fields. Reaching mastery is a long and difficult process which cannot be acquired just with practice. 10,000 hours of deliberate practice can only explain one third of the variation in performance levels, because mastery actually consists of a combination of many essential factors like genes, innate talents, dedication and intelligence. Finally the quantity of practice is not as much important as the way and quality