When einstein proposed his theory of black holes no one believed in it not even einstein himself. However, as the time moved forward we have discovered that the theory was true. With time come new discoveries and new concepts, so what if the concept of parallel universes can be real one day as well?
When we hear the word parallel realities we usually think of movies such as “donnie darko” and “the matrix” In other words all that comes to mind is the pop culture fiction. However, what are parallel realities really? And what's the science behind them?
There are numerous different interpretations of parallel realities, such as, Many Interacting Worlds (MIW), The String Theory, Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) which is the most widely spread
…show more content…
The vector never collapses meaning the reality as a whole is a deterministic system, which means there is no randomness involved. This reality is not just our reality since the outcome we get in our reality is random. Evidently, it is talking about the many realities put together, that makes a deterministic system. Jeffrey Barrett (1998) in his article about hugh everett's theory includes a quotation form DeWhitt and Graham's paper (1973) written about Hugh Everett's The Many Worlds Interpretation Of Quantum Mechanics.
“The state vector decomposes naturally into orthogonal vectors, reflecting a continual splitting of the universe into a multitude of mutually unobservable but equally real worlds, in each of which every good measurement has yielded a definite result and in most of which the familiar statistical quantum laws hold” (qtd. In Barrett)
The next theory I am going to discuss is more appealing to me rather than the previous
…show more content…
Energy in the universe gave rise to repulsive gravity which caused it to extend further, this brings us to the concept of the dark energy. According to this concept, the space is extending despite gravity. Physicists proposed that there is a force which contradicts gravity and named it dark energy, due to the fact that it is hidden form the direct detection. In other words, the space has a property which can drive space apart extending it further. (Wolchover) So if the space is expanding constantly and we only have this set amount of particle configurations again at some point it might repeat
The theory of the case should have put an emphasis
He then uses his new findings to prove his theories. This informative read provides
meaning that there could be more than one reason why our brains evolved and that they will continue to evolve, having a surprise in store for us to find
However, the Universe was insanely hot (billions of degrees), so it is bursting with energy. With that intense amount of energy, “...the Universe expanded explosively, perhaps faster than the speed of light.” Afterwards, the cooling Universe began a series of “phase changes.” During the first second of its existence, distant forces like electromagnetism and gravity forms. At first, the universe was so roughed that particles destroyed themselves, resulting in pure energy.
Of course Taylor’s theory could gain more traction, I still find Brown has a more compelling argument.
My next paragraph will be about theory #2.
The theory posted in the blog was made available to more than just an office of people at which he works, as seen in Connick.
Specifically, two authors, Edward W. Byrn and H. G. Wells, discusses their own opinion consisting between the thought
This theory was conceptualized by C. Wright Mills in 1948-1962 (Ralph Dahrendorf, Lewis Coser, and others also advocated this theory) as he was criticizing
From an opposite point of view, we have to Thomas Hobbes who states that the universe is a great corporeal machine which follows mechanical laws. This mechanical laws can explain
Edward Dolnick’s Clockwork Universe focuses on the scientific revolution of the 17th century. Dolnick takes the stance that the pivotal figures of the time believed that God had created a perfectly running universe that they could decipher. He also mentions the timely restrictions that scientists had to deal with and explains how their findings changed the way people looked at the world. Throughout his book, Dolnick provides several different scientists that held this belief and shows how they prove his thesis. While Dolnick presents a solid argument, he drags on a bit in the discussion of calculus, and at times exaggerates the societies he is portraying.
He proposes a series of alternate (and very possible realities) that
However, it still didn’t explain how information was escaping from the black holes, as the information would remain whole even in the 2D world. Marolf, another person working with such concepts, showed that regardless of string theory, every model of quantum
The origin of the Universe video did a great job explaining the big bang and how the Universe is an ever-expanding thing. Their group explained how our Universe might have started from a black hole. Their group states that there was a quiet, but huge explosion took place, which was the big bang. They also explain how it the big bang has expanded over 13.7 billion light years. At the end of the video, their video explains that a law describes a single action.
In fact, the very first physicist to propose the idea of parallel universes was Hugh Everett. In 1956, Hugh Everett wrote a paper titled The Theory of the Universal Wavefunction, in which he proposed that multiple universes could exist, labelling each universe as a “branch”. Using this theory, the universe can be pictured as a tree (infinite in length and infinitely expanding) where each