Opponents of the Bible often argue that the modern printings of the Bible do not accurately reflect the original autographs of the Old and New Testaments collectively. This criticism of the ultimate authority of some 1 billion people is not a claim that should be taken lightly or readily discarded. Rather, this claim must be carefully investigated and a conclusion must be reached. There are three issues that will be discussed that will satisfactorily answer critics regarding the modern reflection of the original autographs of the Bible. Initially, the date of the oldest on-hand manuscripts must be evaluated to determine the likelihood of mistakes during the transmission process. Secondly, the method of transmission itself from the autographs …show more content…
Beginning with the Old Testament, the oldest manuscripts we have came from the Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran. The find represented all of the Hebrew canon except for Esther and they range in date from 250 BC to 70 AD. The most prominent of the finds was the scroll of Isaiah (ca. 150 BC). This was written approximately 500 years after the autograph. This may seem like a while, however, taking into consideration the life of the average scroll (300 years) this scroll could be only two revisions removed from the original, making it highly unlikely that there would be any massive mistakes made during the time. Moving to the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus which contains the entire New Testament is less than 300 years removed from the autographs. In addition, the discovery of the Rylands Library P52 papyrus (an excerpt from the book of John) dates to 125 AD. This is roughly only 30 years removed from the autograph, making it nearly impossible for meticulous copying to make a mistake. In sum, the sheer dating of the oldest biblical manuscripts attests to the likelihood of accuracy from the autographs to the on-hand …show more content…
If however the scribal transmission process was meticulous and had a mission to maintaining accuracy, then we can ascertain from our ancient manuscripts that what we read reflects what was written. With regards to the Old Testament, the scribal transmission process was tedious and held accuracy in the highest esteem. Most notably the Masoretic tradition was so faithful to maintaining accuracy that they developed a vowel system within the Hebrew language. This tradition probably can find its firmly established roots in Ezra the scribe ca. 447 BC. With the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947 AD, scholars were able to take a first-hand look at the stunning accuracy that had been maintained up to a 1,000-year
There are many reasons to prove that the information is reliable. First, the writings are all letters that are writing to the writers’ countries, and there is
While the development of written word did affect the memory of people of his time, writing also allowed for a preservation of knowledge that was far more reliable than word of mouth and allowed the knowledge to be preserved as well as shared for thousands of
This is very different from the other sources because the topic of history is explained through someones life. The other sources just go by pure fact and and
Lastly, the writing that now makes up sections 121-123 of the Doctrine and Covenants were first sustained as scripture at the October 1880 general conference of the church (Wessel, 2012). Doctrinal Discussion of D&C 121 The Prophetic
In order for an item to be considered a primary source, it has to be made during that time. This piece of information is very important because it can help distinguish between an authentic primary source and a false one. The last thing that Walbert’s reading helped me to understand about primary sources is that they are very important to historians because historians only rely on details that are left behind from the past. Without primary sources,
Therefore, Document 1 and 2 are primary sources because it is an artifact created by humans of that time. Since these four documents are primary sources, they are also reliable records of historical
Most newspapers did this and since historians have relied on these primary sources to interpret the era, it has helped formed the myth that the
Lastly, Historians have demonstrated that this Dynasty has already developed the principles of modern writing techniques. In fact, Chinese literature has undergone relatively limited amounts of change since it was first developed. Documents were initially
Since its introduction by the ancient peoples of Mesopotamia, writing has become a means of communication that has changed the way ideas are shared. Writing opened the door for people to go from hunters and gatherers to civilizations. It allowed for communication to be shared not only mouth to mouth, but from letter to letter. In our history, certain documents have allowed certain individuals to change the course of history. There are certain historical documents that have changed the world and tell us very much about history.
It is unclear whether writing was invented by the Sumerians or the Egyptians. However, what is not disputed is the Sumerians created one of the first and most distinguished forms of writing. 2. What are the cognitive, linguistic, and cultural changes that have accompanied the invention of reading and writing?
Copying the Code also appears to have been a popular assignment for scribes-in-training. In fact, fragments of the laws have been found on clay tablets dating to as late as the 5th century B.C.—more than 1,000 years after Hammurabi’s
Written language can be traced back to 8,000 B.C. from the Ancient Sumerians, but of course before written language can be introduced to other places outside of Sumer, the Ancient Egyptians were using a form of written language, that is commonly attributed to them, Hieroglyphics. Growing up, everyone learned that hieroglyphics was the writing known in Ancient Egypt, but most don’t learn that it wasn’t the only one, in fact, hieroglyphics was the first form of written
The Bible is set apart from other books because it is through it that God speaks and continues to speak to His people, it contains the mind of God. God chose to reveal Himself to His people, establishing a permanent relationship with them by using a principle of the covenant, it is from those covenants that He made with His people where the covenant document was created. From the Mosaic came the Mosaic document, each book of the OT written was authorized as the revealed word of God and were accepted by Israelites community (Bible Dictionary, 2003:201). Paul spoke of all Scriptures are God-breathed (2 Tim. 3:16 NKJV), God miraculously communicated His word to men and led them to write down for permanent preservation.
but then others would argue that someone else wrote it, because of 12:3 “Moses was very meek” thus giving the connotation that someone else wrote
The preservation of ancient texts have been, to say the very least, miraculous. I’d like to veer slightly from simply regurgitating information from