Criminals don’t follow laws.
Gun control laws are more oppressive on citizens than criminals, which is literally someone who has broken, or is breaking, a law. Why are some gun control laws and rulings so heavily pushed? Especially considering that the majority of these laws have very little actual basis aside from the “guns are scary and bad” train of thought. This is going to be going into why most of these laws, current, and proposed, make no sense such as the Magazine Capacity bans that some states are putting in place, the entirety of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA), and the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban(AWB). There isn’t a clear definition for so-called “Assault Weapons”, magazine bans aren’t going to stop a criminal, and for what reason is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE) enforcing, and still modifying a document from the 30s?
A large portion of gun control laws are completely nonsensical and aren’t going to impact someone trying to harm. If the definition of a criminal is that they are breaking the law, why do they think one will follow these laws? One of the terms that are commonly thrown around by anti-gun advocates is the term
…show more content…
One of the major acts that the BATFE passed was the National Firearm Act of 1934 (NFA). It was passed due to the large number of violent criminals in the United States during, and following, the prohibition era in the United States. Even though the NFA was made to stop criminals from getting these firearms, you can still pay the ATF $200 tax stamp and get it anyway. Within the NFA there are a few classifications for what is considered an NFA item, but the major ones are Short Barrelled Rifles (SBR), Automatic Firearms, Suppressors, and Any Other Weapons
Before and after the Revolution many gun control laws came into existence to keep the guns away from the blacks. Gun control is not only a crime issue, but it is a constitutional right issue. According to the second Amendment in the Constitution every citizen has the right to own a bear arms and gun control is a clear violation. The citizens who obey the laws
Not everyone is able to handle a firearm responsibly, and not everyone should have access to all firearms. In the article, The Hard, Simple Truth about Gun Control by Carl T. Bogus writes, “The goal is to devise a system of firearm regulation that allows responsible people to own guns and denies them to irresponsible people”(Bogus 88). One option for gun control is to regulate the sale, purchase and possession of firearms through legislation. This could include measures such as background checks on all gun purchases, restrictions on certain types of firearms, and restrictions on the number of firearms a person can own. Legislation can be effective in reducing gun violence if it is well drafted and properly enforced.
This term can also be used to describe other related matters, such as limitations on the various types of ammunition or technological developments for different kinds of firearms. Current state and federal gun laws constrain certain civilians from owning firearms; specifically those with criminal records, mental illnesses, or drug/ alcohol addictions, as well as immigrants without legal status, and veterans who left the military with dishonor (Charles). These gun laws also require that only licensed gun dealers may sell guns, and must “conduct background checks of their customers through F.B.I run databases” to ensure that their customers are not prohibited from obtaining certain forms of firearms (“Gun Control”). Advocates believe that these laws enhance the safety of Americans and reduce the likelihood of violent crimes committed with the possession of guns. However, opponents such as the National Rifle Association, argue that fewer restrictions on guns protect an individual’s right to self defense, as implied in the second amendment, and result in safer communities (“Gun Control”).
In order to understand the impact of proposed gun control laws, it is vital to understand gun control itself. Gun control laws are regulations of the owning, manufacturing, and use of firearms. In the United States, some see gun control as needed and others see it as a form of tyranny. This divide in beliefs is what has caused gun control to be such a highly discussed issue. The emotional connection that surrounds it, due to shootings and gun violence, also leads people to misjudge the impact on crime that the proposed laws may have.
Gun control laws will not accomplish its intended goals of lowering the crime rate. Gun Control Overview says that “It will be difficult to keep weapons from being acquired by “high-risk” individuals, even under Federal laws and enforcement. Legal ramifications will not stop criminals from making crimes. Those who are determined, irrational, and insane will never respond to rational signals or the threat of legal ramifications. Indeed, such signals and ramifications will most likely encourage them further (3).”
Im assuming that no one in here will ever go out and commit a violent crime involving a firearm. However i cant guarantee that some people we are around everyday will not be involved in a violent crime. I'd like to tell you today why gun control should not be put into large scale effect . I'd like to bring up the number of violent crimes involving firearms in the united states in the year of 2013 before the bulk of the gun control movement had started (refer to chart). IN the year 2013 there were 16,121 homicides nation wide and out of that number 11,208 of them were caused by a firearm of those deaths approximately 750 of the murders were committed with an illegally owned firearm which shows that you do not have to be a felon that is unable to possess a firearm in order to take someones life with one.
People are afraid that the government is trying to take away the ever sacred second amendment, and that without weapons, the ordinary man cannot protect himself. This, however, is not the case. Creating these laws would mean that criminals would be less able to commit gun related crimes, and those who abide by the law would still have proper protection. Even if criminals acquire weapons, people can still find protection in their weapons that they have. No matter what certain citizens view and believe, there are few critical downsides of gun control laws; on the contrary, the laws will provide more protection for the American people, and will ultimately show criminals that this country can stand up for
Strict gun laws negatively affect law-abiding citizens by making it harder to own and purchase firearms; therefore, gun control remains ineffective and unconstitutional.
The gun control people of the United States come in every size, color and shape. It is constantly being said that violent crimes need to stop now! They are focused on taking the guns from the criminals and stop all the random acts of violence happening on our streets and small towns. I don’t think all these gun control citizens understand the true meaning of a criminals mind and how it works. I think a criminal is a criminal whether they have a gun or not.
‘In the late 1980s, gun control groups realized that they had failed in their original goal—getting handguns banned—and began campaigning against semi-automatic firearms they called "assault weapons," most of which are rifles’(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”). From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons (F.D.A) banned semi automatic weapons from having more than 10 rounds. The easiest way to define gun control is by saying it a government regulation sale of any type of handgun, or assault rifle. It’s just a certain style the government sales firearms, if you have a criminal background or criminal history you are not allowed to purchase a firearm due to gun control. I personally think gun control doesn’t cause any harm to today’s society, considering the fact that i’m constantly around guns and I have no violent urge to put anyone in danger.
As Marco Rubio often proclaimed during the primary campaign: "My skepticism about gun laws is criminals don 't follow the law.” People won’t follow laws. People will find ways to bypass laws and commit
Gun control has been a prominent topic of debate in recent years, as concerns regarding mass shootings, gun violence, and public safety have increased. The conversation around this issue has been characterized by strong opinions and divergent perspectives. At the forefront of this discussion are two prominent organizations: the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Administration (ATF). Both the NRA and the ATF have significant influence over gun laws and regulations, and they often find themselves on opposite sides of the debate. One of the primary arguments put forth by the NRA is centered around the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
This way of thinking is understandable because if we don't get weapons, then how are we supposed to protect ourselves. I also disagree with this because if the laws are more strict then there will be less crime and this will make them not want to do the right thing. Some argue that making gun control laws more strict is not the best way to go. ( Sheldon Richman) argues that gun control is ineffective at preventing crime.
Gun laws simply penalize and restrict honest citizens while criminals continue to find ways and loopholes to arm themselves. Gun laws currently established serve their purpose rather poorly as criminals unceasingly buy guns even after they are said to be forbidden. History serves as a clear example of how guns protect the rights and liberties of individuals as it was private guns that aided colonists in fighting the British and gaining America’s