Scott Turow is the author of The Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on dealing with the Death Penalty, published in 2003. Turow has written a series of nonfiction books reflecting current affairs and the legal system. Most importantly, is that Turow is an attorney who has prosecuted as well as defended clients in death penalty cases (Turow,2003). Turow describes his experience with death penalty cases and his work examining the death penalty process, while not precisely a supporter or detractor of the death penalty, his reflections are discussed in his work.
Turow begins by telling us the story of Michelle Thompson and a Rene Valentine that took place when he was in Chicago as an Assistant United States Attorney. Michelle and Rene while in a nightclub parking lot were held at gunpoint in Gurnee, Illinois, an area near Chicago. The gunmen forced Valentine to walk to an area close by, where he was shot and killed and abducted Michelle (Turow,2003). Michelle Thompson was tortured, raped, strangled and murdered. Her remains were found in Wisconsin., leading to the arrest of Hector Reuben Sanchez, and his accessory, Warren Peters, Jr. it was learned that Sanchez had previously killed
…show more content…
Consequently, the Ed Cisowski a commander for the Illinois State Police led an investigation into Dugan’s testimony. Collaborating testimony was that Dugan worked near where Jeanine lived, tire prints matched Dugan’s car, and other little know details were substantiated. Illinois state police concluded that Dugan was the perpetrator of this crime(Turow,2003). This evidence went nowhere, and DuPage County Prosecutors continued to discredit Dugan’s testimony (Turow,2003). In 1994, Hernandez’s and Cruz's convictions were upturned DuPage still insisted on the prosecution. Finally, a series of DNA results that excluded Cruz and Hernandez while including Dugan were argued, subsequently, in 1995, both men were freed
“Once they learned there that was never tested for DNA, including a liquor bottle containing human skin cells and rope found at the crime scene, they visited Adnan Syed in the prison. This quote proves that Christina did not look into DNA evidence. Adnan should be granted post conviction because his past attorney didn’t test potential evidence that could support Syed. Ronald Lee Moore, who was released from prison 10 days before Lee vanished in January 1999, could have been responsible for her death. This quote shows that there could have been other suspects to blame besides Mr. S, who was a strong suspect.
Capital punishment has long been a heavily debated issue. In his article, “The Rescue Defence of Capital Punishment,” author Steve Aspenson make a moral argument in favor of capital punishment on the grounds that that is the only way to bring about justice and “rescue” murder victims. Aspenson argues as follows: 1. We have a general, prima facie duty to rescue victims from increasing harm. 2.
“For Life?” the question that just kept replaying in Lionel Tate’s head over and over again. He never thought he would be sitting in a courtroom at the age of thirteen. Tate had just been sentenced to life without parole. He did not really know what to think as he was charged with murdering a six year old.
In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins, the author shares her thoughts on teen killers and their lives after committing crimes. Throughout the article she also goes through the analysis of the punishment. To summarize, Jenkins starts off by sharing a quote that also shares her opinion on how people act on their own whether they’re influenced or not. As the article goes on she includes her personal experience on how a teen killer murdered her family where she also reveals that she is biased. With research that she might’ve done she implied and backed up the idea that crimes aren’t on impulse sometimes.
Igor Primoratz sets forth an argument that to ensure justice in the legal system the utilization of capital punishment is necessary. According to Primoratz there is no punishment of any equivalence to that of murder, whereas for less severe crimes fines and prison time is reasonable. Primoratz argument consists of three defences to common feedback to the action of capital punishment. The one that was most appealing to me being whether it violates the right to life. To this he responds that when the took the life of another human they lost this right; as these right are only given to those who respect the rights of others.
The case involves the murder of a man's wife and stolen property( this would be the woman’s purse ). The man was talking to the homicide detectives and classified the murderer as African American, knowing this they called young Brenton to come as he was walking and the man told the police it was him, he was the murder. Brenton and his family suffered as he was thrown in jail. The whole investigation was done sloppily, the beat him to get him to say what would fit the detective’s story, and they drafted a paper to say he was admitting to the crime and made him sign it. At the end the jury found him not guilty, he was released.
Pojman’s argument against the objections to capital punishment is not completely valid. If we understand the human being, we can also understand that humans are spiteful people and many people are filled with the hopes of revenge. Therefore, the thirst of revenge could potentially be a contributing factor as to why people are for the death penalty. Even if Pojman doesn’t believe in revenge, it should not be a valid reason for him to ignore its potential in justice and decision making during trials. This world is already filled with bitterness towards one another and we, as a society, cannot stop it because we all have different morals.
The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.
Rough Draft Is the death penalty an effective and justified punishment? This is a topic many Americans have discussed for a long time, and has caused much controversy. Both sides have their pros and cons, and they will be discussed. The first point that many people have about capital punishment is that it’s unconstitutional.
The death penalty is a controversial issue that has been debated in the United States for a long period of time. In our own state of Texas, executing convicted criminals has become second nature. This is due to the fact that Texas has executed more people than any other state in the United States since 1976. So why does Texas lead the United States in executions? There are many reasons and factors that has led to this point.
Death Penalty is a very ominous punishment to discuss. It is probably the most controversial and feared form of punishment in the United States. Many are unaware, but 31 of the 52 states have the Death penalty passes as an acceptable punishment. In the following essay, I will agree and support Stephen Nathanson's statement that "Equality retributivism cannot justify the death penalty. " In the reading, "An Eye for an Eye?", Nathanson gives objections to why equality retributivism is morally acceptable for the death penalty to be legal.
Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).
What is capital punishment? Why has it been such a controversial topic in the United States? According to the legal dictionary, capital punishment is a punishment in the criminal justice system that sentence serious offender to death based off of their crimes committed. [ ] Capital punishment is imposed on criminals to deter crime.[arguments for] Not only to deter crime but have some form of retribution (justice) for the criminal
After he was found guilty, the man was murdered and it was thought that it was by Maya’s
The last person to be executed in Australia was Ronald Ryan at Pentridge Prison, Victoria in 1967 I think Australia should reinstate the death penalty because If someone killed someone from your family, you would have to suffer is that fair? don’t you think the family of the killer should feel the same pain as you.? I also think murderers and terrorists should get the death penalty. I think people who commit homicide should face the death penalty because the family of the person that you killed would suffer both mentally and physically if we reinstate the death penalty, in 2015 247 people were murdered that’s 247 families that suffered.