Although Wells and Marbella suggest that men’s sports are being hurt because of Title IX, Goodale establishes that Title IX is not negatively impacting men’s athletics and is necessary for colleges to follow. Title IX, a 40-year law establishing equal opportunity for women has not negatively impacted men’s sports, as clarified in “40 Years Later, Title IX is Still Fighting Perception it Hurt Men’s Sports” by Gloria Goodale. First and foremost, sports like Football and Basketball take up a majority of a college budget for men’s sports, and when colleges cut minor teams such as baseball or tennis Title IX is unfairly blamed. A large amount of colleges decide to limit men’s athletic to large money-making sports such as football or basketball …show more content…
The tennis team had an approximate budget of $175,000. The National Center for Women’s Law displays that “Rutgers spent about $175,000 in the same year on hotel rooms for the football team - for home games” (Goodale). In addition, without Title IX, many women would be unable to participate in athletics at the college level. Erin Buzuvis, a law professor who teaches at New England University and a co-founder of a Title IX blog illustrates, “... We have always just been fighting for a chance to participate and showcase the athletic skills young women posses. Without Title IX, I don’t think that would’ve been possible” (qtd. in Goodale). When one considers how sports like basketball and football soak up a majority of a college budget for men’s sports and how women’s sports would function without Title IX, it is clear that Title IX does not negatively impact men’s sports and is necessary for colleges to adhere by. In contrast, Title IX has done the opposite of it’s intention, and is leading to discrimination and elimination of men’s athletic teams as suggested in “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” by Jean Marbella and Carrie Wells. As a result, Title IX has lead to an unfair cut of men’s teams as many women do not participate proportionally with their population
Jay Weiner ’s essay “How to Take Back Sports” used an idea to deprofessoinalize college and high school sports, which focused on three topics. I disagree with Jay Weiner’s idea to deprofessionalize sports that included; taking away scholarships, local news coverage, and athletes are introduced to a privilege at a young age. If you didn’t offer a scholarship to play a sport, you wouldn’t have that sport anymore.
In the article titled Face-off on the playing field By, Judith B. Stamper explains girls have their own story of support or discrimination, success also the debate of girls be allowed to compete on boys’ sports team. First, the writer Title IX explains female athletes are been treated second-class for long enough and should pass of inequalities and biases of girls. The writer also clarifies that girls doing sports make them healthier, physically, and emotionally. Other girls that don’t play sports are less likely to use of drugs. In addition, she notes a former Stanford University basketball player Mariah says, strength and independence of things girls learn from sports, the opportunities that are changing women.
First of all, some argues that the tittle IX grants equal sporting opportunities for both male and female students; however, the inequality or unfair treatment for female athletic student still exists. At every high school or college, young female athletics are still facing with the discrimination on the playing field. Women and girls just receive only 42 percent of the opportunities to play sports in high school and college even though female were half of total students.
Title IX In the article, “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” Marbella and Wells talk about how Title IX is hurting men’s sports, while in the article “40 Years Later, Title IX Is Still Fighting Perception It Hurt Men’s Sports” Goodale talks about the benefits of Title IX. In the article “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” the authors describe how the guidelines of Title IX have been the reason for many men’s sports teams being cut in colleges. In the article it also talks about how the law has lost its way and has diminished opportunities for men as a result. It states, hundreds of men’s sports have been cut across the country because of schools citing Title IX.
Last summer, I was afforded the opportunity to take a three-day class on Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics hosted by a former employee of the Office of Civil Rights, Ms. Valerie Bonnette. The class opened my eyes to the basic fundamentals of Title IX, key issues on college campuses and what I could do to make an immediate impact on the campus of Hampton University. The class broke down the understanding of the three prong test and with the recent additions of Women’s Soccer and Men’s Lacrosse. In addition to understanding Title IX’s effects on scholarships, budget, facilities and most importantly female student-athletes.
Title IX reads. “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance” (U.S. Department of Education). As understood in the world of college sports, Title IX requires equal participation opportunity for male and female athletes in proportion to overall campus population and interest. Schools do not have to spend the exact same amount of money on men’s and women’s sports (Hruby). They already sign coaches to drastically different contracts, so there is no reason that Title IX should withhold athletes from receiving just compensation.
1. Every college athletes have put many hours of their hard work towards their respective sport but lack their integrity to achieve their degree. College athletes should stress more on their academic and intelligent capabilities than focusing on their athleticism. Athletes should not underestimate the difficulty of entering a professional league.
Title nine requires athletic programs to be equivalent to enrollment. The number of sports programs for each sex should reflect the ratio of students enrolled in the school. With more women attending college the need for more sports programs has grown dramatically. I don’t want to get in a political discussion about schools who have cut men’s programs so I will only speak on schools who have added women’s programs. This opportunity has not only improved
Some aspects of Title IX will tell you which side you will decide on. Even though I think Title IX is fair to men and women some may disagree with me. They might say that since Title IX seems to be paying more attention to girls they tend to cut out equal rights for men such as playing sports.
There are more opportunities to compete at higher levels through competitions like the Olympics, World Championships and professional leagues. Even more importantly, we know that playing sports can help women become healthier. These health benefits for women and society alone should be reason to keep Title IX strong. Because of the women before me working hard for their rights to play and other opportunities, I know am able to play and participate in activities that I may not have because of their hard work. Because of this I am very grateful for my many opportunities.
Do College Athlete’s Deserve Monetary Compensation? The importance of college athletics has vastly increased over the last century to the extraordinary level that exists today. More than 420,000 college students participate in twenty-three different collegiate sports annually, a number that is continually increasing (NCAA.org). The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is “a membership-driven organization dedicated to the safeguarding of the well-being of student-athletes and equipping them with the skills to succeed on the playing field, in the classroom and throughout life” that institutes the rules regarding collegiate athletics in the United States (NCAA.org).
Should Collegiate Athletes Be Introduced to a Pay Grade? Due to the many amenities collegiate athletes already receive, such as special registration for classes, large scholarships, and thousands of dollars each in terms of travel and team expenses, student-athletes should not be paid. While many college sports supporters feel college athletes should be referred to in the same interest as big-time professional athletes due to their experience and the difficulty of performing well in their specific sport, a more in-depth perspective needs to be taken on the subject. Student-athletes attending college spend a great amount of time devoted to their individual sport, but even though they spend immense amounts of time working to get better on
Title IX discriminates against male athletes by cutting teams, trying to make male sports equal to female sports, and news coverage. First of all, male athletes are being discriminated against by cutting the teams. By cutting the teams, the males are being excluded from participation in the sport, which is a violation of Title IX. Just because there are too many male athletes, doesn’t be that the
For, instance, if college athletes were to unionize and get paid, then all collegiate athletes would want the same compensation deal, although their sport doesn’t generate as much revenue as power and performance sports such as football and basketball. The ramifications can be serious if female student athletes mention Title IX, which is a gender equity law that prohibits sex discrimination in any federally funded program or activity. Since some women’s sports generate revenue,
If society stops to understand the struggles these women have been facing for decades will have a clearer picture of what steps to take in order to make a change in the sports industry. Men need to put their masculinity aside and advocate giving women a voice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the issues women in the sport world have faced through history, wage gaps, current issues today, and to discuss findings and recommendations for future research. Title IX is a law that came into effect in 1972, this comprehensive federal law prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.