Title IX
When Title IX was passed, one in twenty-one high schools girls played a sport. Most people think Title IX only applies to sports, but athletics is one of the many areas addressed by the law. Women were not able to pursue their dreams as much as men. They were not able to show their true talent that most women had. Even though Title IX stated that no one should be denied benefits all over the world systems were still not up to par and were not equally fair. Being involved in athletics is an important benefit that no one should be granted just because of their race, age, and gender. Title IX has been one of the most influential laws to respect to women, and specifically female athletes. Women demanded they needed a chance to become involved
…show more content…
“Concerns about family, marriage, children, and over one’s life and destiny on issues dealing with birth control and abortion are but one set of concerns. Educational opportunities, occupational choices, even the right to work outside of the home are yet another set of concerns” (Lunardini xii). They had a lot of other problems to be solved as well. Most were just involved in trying to become accepted in the sports world, but many had other situations outside sports. These problems kept arising turning into bigger problems. “Women couldn’t attend college to most states. The wages they earned working outside the home went to their husbands or fathers, not to them. And they were helpless to change the laws because they weren’t allowed to vote” (Blumenthal 10). Women were helpless and it was simply the men’s show.
On very little occasions girls got the chance to play with the boys. “For many decades girls’ only real chance to compete would come on occasional “Play Days” with neighboring schools” (57). These were very special to the girls because this was their only chance to be mixed with boys, while playing sports that they loved. This kept giving girls the confidence and sooner or later they would not worry about not being accepted. “No longer would females accept ‘No girls allowed’ attitude” (91). Women and girls did not take any grief and kept on fighting for their
…show more content…
“These women activists provided a support system to encourage the implementation of women’s equity through the Title IX, the Women’s Educational Equity Act, and related legislation”(Aquila 7). These women were a major part of keeping the women held together through these tough times. Their support system was very bold and they stuck to their word. Another group of women were a big part in Title IX. “A group of women that year hastily formed the National Organization of Women or NOW, at a conference on women. NOW’s goal would be to push for better enforcement of the law and to seek ‘full equality for women’ ” (Blumenthal 20). These groups of activist were a positive part of this time period. Much of female participation in sports and Title IX has changed the political position of women and young girls. The female opportunity can only continue to soar and show more progress over the years. People do not realize that women have the potential to play any sport that a man can play, with equal skill, if not better. If it were not for Title IX women and men would not have achieved amazing goals on and off the playing field. Women deserved every bit of what they earned and even more. Men and women were both given the same amount of opportunities, but somehow the women were still not treated the
Title IX In the article, “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” Marbella and Wells talk about how Title IX is hurting men’s sports, while in the article “40 Years Later, Title IX Is Still Fighting Perception It Hurt Men’s Sports” Goodale talks about the benefits of Title IX. In the article “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” the authors describe how the guidelines of Title IX have been the reason for many men’s sports teams being cut in colleges. In the article it also talks about how the law has lost its way and has diminished opportunities for men as a result. It states, hundreds of men’s sports have been cut across the country because of schools citing Title IX.
Title IX has had significant effects on women's sports and education. Originally, women were allowed to be on intermural teams and play on play days or sport days with various females on their team because no team roster was dictated. Through this opportunity, women were given a taste of competition and what they could be doing. DGWS was formed to promote female sports, train referees for women's sports, hold clinics for coaches, and dictate rules of the game for female sports. At this time, the focus of women's sports was about having fun and enjoying the sport, not about competing.
Title IX Prior to June 23, 1972, when the Title IX act was passed, few opportunities existed for female athletes. The Title IX act, pioneered by Dorothy Height, opened up new doors for women and girls. This act was a huge success for all female athletics, as women and girls alike began to be treated more equality in the sports world Female sports went very unrecognized before Title IX. Elementary schools rarely offered competitive sports programs for girls, and college girls athletics were intramural rather than extramural; meaning the girls would compete against other girls from their school rather than girls from other colleges and universities. Educators knew this was an issue but they could not do anything about it, as there were no resources available to improve the situation.
I also do not agree that it would be fair men's sports had to help funds women's sports or vice versa. I think Title IX has good intentions in such the attempt to stop discrimination and sex segregation, but I feel that individuals' whom have power over applications, still have the ability to deny applications and write off a different reason for denial. Overall, Title IX has it's pros and cons. I believe this policy would be great if applied appropriately and if it did not have holes in the system.
Title IX has had a huge effect on public school education. In fact the impact is so great I could not list them all. For the sake of time I will list the biggest one and that is the impact on women’s athletics. In 1971 only 15% of the athletes in college were women. In 2012 that number is 43%.
Some aspects of Title IX will tell you which side you will decide on. Even though I think Title IX is fair to men and women some may disagree with me. They might say that since Title IX seems to be paying more attention to girls they tend to cut out equal rights for men such as playing sports.
Title Ⅸ greatly influenced the growth of women’s participation in sports in collegiate athletics. Also introduced in the reauthorization of 1972 was the Basic Educational Opportunity Act which later became the Pell Grant in the reauthorization of 1980. The reauthorization of 1972 marked a shift away from loans towards grants, that is until the 1990s when loans began to supersede
Should woman have their own sports league or be excluded from sports?In the first place, women should have their own Pro Team, because imagine if your mom is On the football field for the Packers, and these to bigger guys come charging at her. Not only... but also, its because male and female body's are constructed differently. An example is that woman tend to be more flexible than men. Not to mention that their dreams of being an athlete might be over. Thesis Statement: This essay will explain several reasons why woman should be excluded from sports or have their own sports league.
Women have recently gained some of their rights. They have gained the right to vote, and to work in corporate. Women not being able to play boy’s sports is a set back from having all their rights. Girls should not be able to play on boys sports teams for the following
There 's been real growth in the number of women who participate in sports, receive scholarships, and benefit from increased budgets. There are more opportunities to compete at elite levels through competitions like the Olympics, World Championships and professional leagues. Opponents of Title IX claim that there is a negative impact on boys’ and men’s sports arising from attempts to increase opportunities for girls and women in athletics. These criticisms are based on misinterpretations of the law and are not supported by the facts. Title IX has revolutionized athletics as it continues to impact the world today.
This also relates to girls and boys. If it is not provided, both sexes have to be allowed to try out if they want to participate on the same team. The division between men and women’s teams has increased the number of women playing in a sport. Before Title IX, less than three hundred thousand women played
Since the Title IX was passed, opportunities for women in sports exploded. Pat says that high school sports had a staggering 904% increase in girl’s participation and in college, there was a 456% increase as well. What really stood out to me was when Pat said, “As more women and girls have taken advantage of more and better opportunities to play, cultural norms have changed as well.” Girls now are believing that being physically fit and athletic is an important part of a woman’s identity. In the past, being physically fit and athletic means you are a tomboy, lesbian or a “dike”.
Yet they are still treated as second class citizens. The media continuously emphasizes gender stereotypes and trivializes the seriousness of women’s sports. Women need to speak up and defend the right for girls to play. Although, men are physiologically bigger, faster, and stronger, female athletes deserve to be celebrated and respected for their talent and not just their bodies. Females deserve to be a recognized part of the athletic community.
Eventually this law was used to create more opportunities for women in sports. This did increase women’s participation in sports significantly, but women still faced criticism and scrutiny. Furthermore, men stereotyped women as not “being good enough” to play sports, labeling them as weak, fragile, and
Title IX was an education amendment signed in 1972 that prohibited sexual discrimination in education programs that receive Federal financial assistance (20 United States Code section 1681). In the case of the NCAA, the majority of its membership receives some type of Federal dollars, therefore requiring them to comply with Title IX regulations. Title IX states that schools receiving Federal aid must provide equal opportunities to all athletes and because of the limited number of revenue-generating sports, not every athlete would have access to the same opportunity. Prior to Title IX, there were virtually no college scholarships for female athletes, and those athletes received less than two percent of overall athletic budgets (Women’s Sports Foundation, 2008). Since the infusion of Title IX into universities, female athletes now receive athletic scholarships, and benefit from institutions increased budgets.