In the film Taxi Driver, Travis Bickle, a middle aged man with no proclaimed direction in life in the beginning of the film. He soon enough, through his convictions about the "scum of the city," a love lost, and perhaps mental instability as a result of the Vietnam war, finds meaning in his life and carries it out through controversial actions. According to Merriam-Webster judging is defined as: "to form an opinion about (something or someone) after careful thought." Whether it be taking a girl out on a first date to a porno movie, or attempting to assassinate a senator, Travis Bickle should be judged by his intentions, rather than the consequences of his actions. When Travis falls for Betsy, the relationship ends up derailing itself on the …show more content…
If we judge Travis according to his intentions, we can determine that he was completely in the wrong to do such a thing. On the other hand though, the assassination was a failed attempt. If we judge him on the consequences of his actions, did he really do anything wrong? The consequences of his actions did not leading to anything bad in this scenario, no. This is an issue, so what is the use of judging an action? You could say that the use in it is to say whether or not that action was a good idea with what ever information is available at the time. So for example: If I give Joe a dollar for lunch at school, and later a man invades his classroom with the intention of killing everyone in possession of money, was it a mistake? If Joe 's sister Jane steals the dollar, saving Joe from the currency hating invader, should we praise her? In this particular case, I caused harm, and Jane saved her brother 's life. But to say that my action was wrong because it happened to have a negative outcome this one time, and that Jane 's was right because it happened to have a good outcome this one time, does not seem to sit well. In both scenarios with Jane and Travis, these are 2 ill intentioned decisions that ended up not having negative consequences, should Travis not be punished for attempting such a egregious act? And what if the next time they act on those bad intentions, something bad does
On that morning, there had been a shootout outside of a supermarket. Jared Lee Loughner, a Tucson resident, changed the lives of many people on that day. He killed 6 people, including a 9-year-old girl, and injured 13. While the judge believes that Loughner is competent, I agree too. I understand that he is a paranoid schizophrenic but this was indeed premeditated murder, so it’s hard for to go against the decision.
PART (A) What criminal charge is Dave most likely to face? Discuss any defenses. Embezzlement
In other words, the only effect of an action that is relevant is the bad and good outcomes it produces (Henry, 2011). It is notable that people who uphold utilitarianism believe that morality has the purpose of making life better by way of increasing
Felon turned drug counselor then actor, Danny Trejo was born in Echo Park, California on May 16th, 1944 as an only child to his parents (TheLipTV, 2012). While growing up Danny Trejo spent most of his time with his father and criminal Uncle Gilbert, his father’s brother (HuffPost Live, 2014). Uncle Gilbert quickly became a powerful influence over Trejo. Trejo was drawn to his uncle because as Trejo recounts: I remember him and his crime partner, and they did a robbery.
They broke the law, yet no one thinks they should be punished, they hurt people and no one cares. They deserve punishment, not special treatment, they shouldn't turn the other cheek. One vital reason that Howie and Laura should be punished is that they broke the law, repeatedly with no reproductions. The text provides evidence that the sheriff won't be pressing charges, Margo Cutter tells Ms.Golden ‘I don't think sheriff Prosser will be pressing charges’’(p. 166). The circumstance was that they were bullied, this does not warrant criminal activity.
As Issac Newton said, every action has an equal or opposite reaction. Just like every decision has an equal or opposite consequence. In the story “Dear Justyce” by Nic Stone, the main character Quan is faced with some tough predicaments. These predicaments lead him to make some bad decisions. Such as stealing from a gas station or joining a gang.
Yes, he should’ve acted differently, although we don’t know what goes on in someone’s head when they see something so crazy happen so fast. How would it feel to see someone you are so close to kill someone you just met? I wouldn’t believe it or know what to do. As I’ve said before Dustin isn’t completely innocent but the charges he has aren’t accurate especially compared to Billy since he has less than Dustin even after admitting to being guilty of murder.
it’s better than doing what’s wrong therefore the person will create a positive impact. Throughout the story, we learn that one always has a chance to make the right decision.
On June 9, 2008, Travis Alexander’s body was discovered in a shower in his home in Mesa, Arizona. Alexander was found to have died from 27-29 stab wounds, along with his throat being slit and a gunshot wound to the head. Alexander’s ex-girlfriend, Jodi Arias, was the prime suspect after investigators discovered they had several arguments leading up to his death and certain pieces of evidence placed her at the scene of the crime. On July 15, 2008, the first stage of the case began when Jodi Arias was indicted by a grand jury and arrested for the first-degree murder of Travis Alexander.
Uncle Jewiir Heart “What does he/she love? Whom? How?” In this novel “A Long Walk to Water” Uncle Jewiir is a good-natured person and is passionate about caring for Salva. Uncle Jewiir has always stuck to Salva ever since he joined the group, even when Salva felt like comply to the desert Uncle Jewiir always carried him onward.
People always get misjudged and want to say who or what a person is like before they even meet him or her. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, has many examples of misjudging people, and some of those people could be better, or worse, than what that person judged. Most of these characters in the book do not have the sense to meet someone before they judge them. Even if a character knows a character, they still judge, and they judge wrong most of the time. People just don’t have enough sense, or manners, to not judge.
When a person is going to make a moral decision based on consequentialism, he or she first look at the good and bad possible consequences of the action, then determine whether the total good consequences outweigh the total bad.
As we know consequentialism is the focus of an action that does more intrinsically good than bad, one kind of consequentialist theory is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an action that produces consequences that are more good over bad for everyone involved. In order to produce an action that is the best one a utilitarianist would consider both long and short term effects. Two sub categories of utilitarianism include act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. act utilitarianism bases an action on the overall well being produced by an individual.
Romans 12:19 answers these questions succinctly: “Dearly beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’ ” God will deal justly with wrongdoers, and has instituted legal systems around the world to achieve this justice on earth. When Travis Alexander’s family left the vengeance to the court, they obeyed God’s command, and He repaid Jodi Arias for her sins through the legal system’s decision. God also displayed His mercy, however, through the various mistrials and legal complications that resulted in the death penalty decision being
Some actions, like journeys, have value regardless of the outcomes they produce. Williams brings this point about to show how the utilitarian’s focus on consequences might not be the best way to assign value to actions, since it has no way of accounting for the intrinsic values actions may have. Here I have to agree with Williams. The manner in which consequentialist judge actions does not seem to allow any room for considering a person’s intent behind choosing to commit that act. Williams seems to be more open to such considerations than Smart ever was in his