Albeit General Robert E. Lee wore red and Private Buster Kilrain wore blue, these two men were quite similar in several ways. Each soldier was a leader in a war that they chose to fight in, in order to uphold and defend their respective ideologies. Despite those ideologies being opposite, each felt theirs was superior and in turn was willing to sacrifice his life to protect it and the way of life it afforded. Buster Kilrain and Robert E. Lee were very close in age, Kilrain at the ripe old age of fifty-one and Lee at the slightly riper age of fifty-seven.
Grant on the other hand was not raised wealthy at all he knew the struggle, he had a vision for where he thought the future was going. Completely different, but exactly the same when it came to their personality. Almost the same even when they were fighting, Grant fought with tenacity, Lee fought knowing he would give his life at any second if he had too. This is why people looked up
Etaja Green Professor Stephen Brandon ENG 112 - Composition and Rhetoric 20 March 2017 Richmond Post Civil War The Civil War was a battle fought between the Northern states and the Southern states between eighteen sixty-one and eighteen sixty-five. The was also known as “The Battle Between The States” The war was fought between the states due to differences in opinions on taxes, tariffs, and states rights vs federal rights.
Challenges of the late 19th century between Ulysses S. Grant and Frederick Jackson Turner. Grant was known for his Inaugural Address he wrote on March 4th, 1869 he talked about rights for every man no matter what race to have equal rights and be able to vote anywhere in the United States. Grant also hated politics; he thought he didn’t owe Politian’s anything. Grant was also a popular person, being that he was a popular person people told him to run for president and so he did. He didn’t have to campaign himself because everyone just voted for him.
I gathered that areas of focus within the analysis are centered greatly on the upbringing of both generals. While General Lee showed a more traditional, knightly, and privileged stance on how he was raised, General Grant portrayed a working man who has known harsh work as well as life overall. General Lee sought to preserve that which he already had, consequently paying no mind to the rest of the country. Conversely, General Grant wished for an ever-widening horizon as well as growth and prosperity for the nation. Unifying qualities, however, are less expected than one might initially consider.
These battles had taken up to 7 days to be over. This experience had made him a great leader and gave him more knowledge on what to do while on the battlefield. The only person to rank higher than stonewall jackson was General Robert E. Lee. Stonewall jackson had better tactics and was considered a better war hero in the south than General Robert E. Lee was. T.J. “Stonewall” jackson was a great leader and an incredible fighter,
Catton analyzes General Lee and General Grant from the stand point of how they are different in background, in personality, and in aspirations. As he continues, the distinct differences between the two Generals are very evident. Although the distinctions are clear, so are some of the similarities between them. Catton describes them as “two strong men, oddly different generals, and they represented the strengths of two conflicting currents that, through them, had come into final collision.” General Lee was an Aristocratic Man, a man who was brought up privileged.
Harriet Tubman and Abraham Lincoln were both helpful and generous for their help with slavery. Both icons are known for their own unique qualities and rare involvements. Harriet and Lincoln are both known for their passion against slavery. Both Harriet and Lincoln grew up in poverty they weren’t very wealthy. Harriet was born into slavery and Lincoln was left to work and had to take care of himself at a young age.
The Civil War brought about many things, such as revolution, justice, and tragedy, but it also birthed two truly great minds of their time. These individuals were Abraham Lincoln and Nathan Bedford Forrest. One led the North as president of the United States, while the other was a Lieutenant General of the Confederate Army. While both were brilliant and truly outstanding amongst their peers, one man truly outshined the other in regards to a stronger and more efficient leadership. While Lincoln faced more success in a national sense, Nathan Bedford Forrest clearly possessed more respected authority and was a stronger overall leader than Abraham Lincoln.
Anytime you learn about history you always hear about the big people like Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant because they were the leaders on the north and south, but lets talk about the little people that made a huge difference such as Harriet Tubman and Mary Boykin Chesnut. Harriet Tubman was born in 1820 in Maryland. She was an abolitionist, activist and one hell of a woman. She was mainly known as the conductor of the underground railroad where she made over 19 trips between the north and south in ten years while bringing hundreds of slaves to freedom. She started as a slave herself, working as a servant and working the fields for cotton, she got word that some of the slaves were going to be sold so she decided the best thing for her
Harriet Tubman and Abraham Lincoln are two very different people right?Wrong they are two very similar and played similar roles in the Foundation of the U.S we know today,They both helped fight slavery in their little ways Harriet would help them escape to the free part of the states and Canada risking her live everyday. As for Honest Abe he would make convincing speeches about how slavery should end and then eventally ended it with the Civil War. Both Abraham Lincoln and Harriet Tubman had many things in common like they were both with the fight against slavery. They both had a big impact on the African American society in the sense of helping them find freedom. They were both very secretive about their lives in the sense that they both didn't
Grant helped the Union. Grant won the Battle of Vicksburg. The Battle of Vicksburg is considered to be one of the huge turning points of the war. Lincoln later appointed Grant to lieutenant general in 1864. Grant was then steadfast on making general Robert E. Lee to surrender.
African Americans received freedom and citizenship with the ratifications of the 13th amendment and 14th amendment respectively. One of the heroic women of the 1800s was someone named Elizabeth Jennings Graham, from 1830-1901. Elizabeth Jennings was a New York schoolteacher whose 1854 defiance of a streetcar conductors orders to leave his car helped desecrates public transit in New York City. Another person was Fredrick Douglass. Fredrick Douglass was an African American social reformer, abolitionist, orator, writer, and statesman.
The books that are being compared and contrasted are both about The Civil War and what these soldiers went through. Each book has a few differences that separate them. The books are based on the same time period so they are going to have a lot in common. The books describe what both characters had to go through during the war. The differences in the book will show you how each soldier went through the war differently and the similarity’s will show you how it was for most of the soldiers in the Civil War.
Two Great Men “Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time. ”- Thomas a. Edison Frederick Douglas and Booker T. Washington were both amazing civil rights activists. Frederick Douglas was a runaway slave who worked to end slavery.
