"His mangled body sank out of sight, and blood and brains marked the water where he had stood." (Douglass, 67). Just one sentence can prove how brutal slave-owners, slaveholders, and overseers can be towards slaves. A use of violence to control slaves can be seen throughout the book, and Frederick is very against violence in all forms. He only uses it when it was necessary,like the fight with Mr. Covey. Using deadly violence to control happens on very early in Frederick's lifetime. His own Aunt, Aunt Hester, was a prime target for Captain Anthony. He always found a reason to whip her, and "The louder she screamed, the harder he whipped, and where the blood ran fastest, there he whipped longest." (Douglass, 51). She was also warned to never be absent when her master "required her presence" and never, ever to be found with a man named Ned Flanders. One night, she was absent when Fred and Hester's master required Aunt Hester's presence, and the overseers who were hired by Capt. Anthony found Aunt Hester with Ned Flanders. Strippping her of her clothes, and tying her to a hook, he proceeded to whip her, Frederick watching from the closet near them. After rolling up his sleeves, Capt. Anthony "...proceeded to lay on the heavy cowskin, and soon the warm, red blood (amid heart-rending shrieks from her, and horrid oaths from him) came dripping to the …show more content…
Gore is a very great example of using deadly force to control slaves. When he had whipped Demby (a fellow slave) but a few times, Demby dashed to the river to cool down the wounds on his back, and resisted Mr. Gore's calls for him to come out. After Mr. Gore's third call to come out, (…raised his [Mr.Gore’s] musket to his face, taking deadly aim at his standing victim, and in an instant Demby was no more." (Douglass, 67). This part of the book can show that the use of deadly force to keep slaves under control can be actually deadly. It is also very disturbing how calm and collected Mr.Gore was after shooting
Just Versus Unjust Violence: A Rhetorical Analysis of Violence in Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass and Uncle Tom’s Cabin Frederick Douglass and Harriet Beecher Stowe present slavery in vastly distinct ways. In Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, author Frederick Douglass dives into a grisly world filled with bloodshed and in the middle of it a man willing to do what it takes to be educated and in control of his own person, narrated with the voice of reason. In Uncle Tom’s Cabin, author Harriet Beecher Stowe depicts a variety of characters, their struggle with slavery and religion, their personal relationships, and their deep inner feelings, with no small degree of emotion and sentimentality. Douglass and Stowe’s use of
I believe chapter three had focused mainly on Colonel Lloyd, and his treatment of his slaves. I believe that the description of Colonel Lloyd's treatment of his slaves, and how both his sons and son-in-law's treatment of slaves were used to show their cruelty. For example, it was stated within the chapter that slaves who worked at the stables were verbally and physically abused depending on the horse's condition, which was likely not even related to their treatment from the slaves. For example, a slave was verbally and physically abused if the horse’s head was not high enough. Another instance in the chapter was when Frederick Douglas had explained that slaves of Colonel Lloyd would be further be verbally and physically berated the master
She talks about how she was treated by Dr. Flint " But Dr. Flint swore he would kill me, if I was not as silent as the grave." Although in Jacobs narrative she was treated, in Douglass' his grandmother was whipped "The louder she screamed, the harder he whipped, and where the blood ran fastest, there he whipped the longest." He also talks about how bad women had it "He would whip her to make her scream, and whip her to make her hush; and not until overcome, would he cease to swing the blood-clooted cowskin." Then he talks about how slavery was like hell "It was the blood-stained gate, the entrance to the hell of slavery, through which I was about to pass."
In Frederick Douglass's "slave breaker" passage, he uses many rhetorical strategies to describe the horrors of living under a man named Mr. Covey. This man surfaced in chapter 10 who was a wretched soul full of false morals and deceiving powers. Throughout the passage Frederick emphasizes tone and shares anecdotes of his experiences describing them with metaphor, parallelism and emotional appeal. In coalesce with the first paragraph, Frederick makes a point to convey Mr. Covey as a devilish creature by giving him snake like qualities.
She received a fortune of attention from her master. That lead to numerous lashings, which Douglass witnessed. Hester has lasting effects Douglass where he has a clear picture of her being beaten by Captain Anthony. She constrained Douglass, alongside different components, around the abolitionist development. This character demonstrates every one of the reader’s reality behind slave proprietors' falsehoods and that there were genuine individuals quite recently like everybody in his gathering of people getting beaten and killed in light of their skin shading.
Douglass was sick that day so he wasn’t able to make it to his shift in the fields. Another perpetrator and victim situation we see in the narrative is when Douglass is telling us about a slave named Demby is shot and killed by an overseer after he fled from a beating. “Mr. Gore then, without consultation or deliberation with any one, not even giving Demby an additional call, raised his musket to his face, taking deadly aim at his standing victim, and in an instant poor Demby was no more” (Douglass, “Narrative” 955). When asked why he shot and killed Demby, Mr. Gore replied that he became “unmanageable”. Again we see that they use the term “unmanageable” as an excuse for why they treat the slaves with such
Frederick Douglass published two similar versions of his fight with the ‘slave-breaker’ Edward Covey in the tenth chapter of his The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass: An American Slave, and in the seventeenth chapter of My Bondage and My Freedom. By comparing the two accounts it is possible to see an evolution of his thoughts on abolishing slavery and person hood which occurred in the years which transpired between the two works, 1845 and 1855. In the first account which Douglass wrote at around the age of 27 he narrates a physical confrontation where he refuses to allow himself to be whipped. Douglass struggles for two hours with Covey and also fights off Covey’s cousin at the same time.
Douglass uses paradox to demonstrate that slavery degragrates the slaverholder. When Douglass under Mr. Sever’s care he described that: “He was less cruel, less profane… He whipped, but seemed to take no pleasure in it. ”(Douglass 24). Most slaveholders are characterized to be cruel and inhuman because of the whipping and the way they treated the slaves.
Inhyeok (Daniel) Lee Mr. Soldi CP English III October 17, 2014 Bloodthirsty Revenge portrayed through Roger Chillingworth In his novel Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne utilizes several allegories throughout the story. Allegory is a literary technique that Hawthorne uses to connect the characters with symbolic presences. It gradually builds up the tension between characters, and also arouses curiosity of readers.
Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Analysis Essay The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, written by Frederick Douglass himself, is a brutally honest portrayal of slavery’s dehumanizing capabilities. By clearly connecting with his audience’s emotions, Douglass uses numerous rhetorical devices, including anecdotes and irony, to argue the depravity of slavery. Douglass clearly uses anecdotes to support his argument against the immorality of slavery. He illustrates different aspects of slavery’s destructive nature by using accounts of not only his own life but others’ alsoas well.
In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Douglass's battle with his master Covey is a turning point in his career as a slave in that he resolves to no longer be docile and subservient as a slave. In fighting back against Covey, Douglass frees his mind from the psychological effects of slavery. Douglass's battle with Covey marks the end of Douglass being obedient and not questioning the word of authority like he was brought up to do. Douglass vows that "the white man who expected to succeed in whipping, must also succeed in killing me." (Douglass, 83) By refusing the role of an obedient slave, Douglass also refuses the slave mindset and liberates himself.
The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass shows the imbalance of power between slaves and their masters. In his book, Douglass proves that slavery is a destructive force not only to the slaves, but also for the slaveholders. “Poison of the irresponsible power” that masters have upon their slaves that are dehumanizing and shameless, have changed the masters themselves and their morality(Douglass 39). This amount of power and control in contact with one man breaks the kindest heart and the purest thoughts turning the person evil and corrupt. Douglass uses flashbacks that illustrate the emotions that declare the negative effects of slavery.
Slavery was a long, slow process of dulling. Slaves had the constant fear of physical violence, the threat of losing the ones they love, and endured a life of always being treated as subhuman. One way that slavery dulled those in its grip was the constant fear of physical violence. Their masters could hurt or kill them at any moment and there’s nothing they could do. Dana explains how whippings were
This shows that the way a Master behaves around a slave can be very influential, and Douglass explains that he was compelled to give all his hard-earned money to Master Hugh because the influence the Master had on him was to give him everything he worked hard for. Next, on page 10 of his Narrative, Douglass proclaims, “They never knew when they were safe from punishment. They were frequently whipped when least deserving, and escaped whipping when most deserving it. Every thing depended upon the looks of the horses,
Christianity was, to the slaves of America, (something with a double meaning). In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass an American Slave, Frederick Douglass, the author, argues about how Christianity can mean one thing to a free white man and something completely different to a black slave. The slave owners follow the ‘Christianity of the Land’ while the slaves follow the ‘Christianity of Christ.’ Frederick begins to build his credibility to a, white, northern, audience by including documents from trustworthy writers and by getting into personal experiences through his writing. Throughout the narrative, he is articulate in how he writes, and it shows the reader that he is well educated.