Within recent years crime television has made a large impact on the United States. We have many television shows dedicated to showing past crimes, especially murder cases. Along with those television shows, we have many movies to depict major crimes. Hollywood has taken many court cases and created intriguing movies out of them. While creating these movies can be looked at as informative, it can also change the way society views these cases. In order to keep them interesting, and clear cut Hollywood has to change certain facts about the case, which then makes the movie inaccurate. However, there are some movies that Hollywood has been able to keep accurate for the most part. One of those movies is the movie Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in …show more content…
While the Italian court does not publically release all of the information, nor is it translated, there are many sources that followed the case closely, that are able to give and outline of the case. Amanda Knox was a 21 year old foreign exchange student in Italy, who was accused of killing her roommate Meredith Kercher. Knox who was from Seattle was described as a fun, happyish girl (Harris, P.,2009). Amanda and Meredith were considered to be friends, while they had their disputes they still spent most of their time together. Amanda’s friends back home in Seattle believe that she had been wrapped up in a horrible nightmare (Harris, …show more content…
During the time of the trial Amanda’s demeanor changed. On the first day of the trial she walked in smiling (Hooper, J.. 2009). However, at the end of the trial she cries as she tells the court to not put the mask of an assassin on her (Association, P., 2009). The prosecution called forensic specialists to speak on their behalf, to explain the DNA that was found. Raffaele and Amanda were tried at the same time in Italian court. The courts found both of them guilty on multiple charges. Amanda was charged with a 26 year sentence (Timeline: Meredith Kercher murder case., 2016). When seeing how the case was processed in Italy, it is still unclear if the same verdict would have been found if the case was in the United States. Most of the evidence that was used to convict Amanda Knox was not concrete. There was also a large disadvantage to the fact that she was from America, she was not familiar with everything there in the legal system. While she did have Italian lawyers she was not able to assist them in her defense, because she knew so little about their legal
While attending school in Italy, Amanda Knox a 27 year old American from Seattle Washington, has gotten herself caught up in quite a lengthy monstrosity. It began in 2007 when Knox and 23 year old Raffaele Sollecito, her boyfriend of one week claim to have been at his home smoking hash and watching movies all night. Upon arriving at the home Knox shared with her roommate the next morning, the pair noticed something astray and called police claiming there must have been a robbery. The police entered the home only to later discover the bloody body of Knox’s roommate Meredith Kercher. After conducting their investigation along with questioning both Knox and Sollecito, the two were charged and eventually convicted in 2009 for the gruesome stabbing
The Casey Anthony case is the trial of Casey Anthony for the death and murder of Caylee Anthony. The two parties in this case are Casey Anthony against the state of Florida. The trial is a criminal case because it is involving a murder of a child. The trial was originally heard in state court. Although Casey Anthony plead not guilty on the first degree murder charge, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a child, she was convicted of the misdemeanor which was giving false information to the police and authorities and was given 4 consecutive years of jail time (one year per count) and was fined 1,000$ for each of her four counts (4,000$ in total).
Understanding the Jodi Arias case was simple. Tons of information was available for a case lasting nearly 7 years before deciding on sentencing. A little background on the case, on the evening of June 4, 2008, Travis Alexander was murdered by his ex-girlfriend Jodi Arias in his home in Mesa, Arizona. Nearly 5 days later his friends, concerned, showed up at his house to find Alexander in the shower of his home, dead. Alexander had faced multiple stab wounds, roughly 27-29 of estimate, his throat had be slit and he had been shot in the head.
In order to charge Knox with murder, the defense should have raised a case against Mrs. Knox based on a conspiracy tactic. This would have convicted Knox for killing and Mrs. Knox for conspiracy to murder and obstructing justice. Over the years, legal television shows have been an important
The trials of Sacco and Vanzetti goes on about how they were falsely executed for murdering a guard and armed robbery because of their immigrant background . After the murderers escaped the scene with the money the police searched a garage to claim a car it was connected to. Sacco and Vanzetti were arrested because victims said it was two Italian men who committed the crime but neither of them had previous trouble with the law. No one really know if they did it because witnesses only said there was two Italian men who did it when any Italian could’ve been a suspect. This trial shows that the 1920’s were prejudiced against certain ethnic group, specifically Italians.
Americans became fascinated by Casey Anthony when she became a household name following the disappearance of her daughter. After being raised in Ohio, Anthony was later charged with the murder of her daughter Caylee following their move to Florida. Anthony’s trial quickly became public, and shocked the nation after she was acquitted of all murder charges. The majority of America assumed Anthony was guilty, but without substantial evidence, the jury lacked the confirmation they needed to lock her up for good. The question remains today, how did Caylee Anthony die?
Lizzie Borden Imagine being famous for murdering two close family members with an axe. Lizzie Borden became well-known for being charged with the gruesome murder of her father and stepmother, on August 4th 1892. During this time, women were considered the “weaker” sex, and not capable of murder. However, there was evidence to prove Lizzie Borden was guilty.
Additionally, familial dynamics also played a role in shaping public perception of this case. The documentary illustrates how deeply rooted social hierarchies and power structures within small towns can impact how people view crimes committed by those in positions of privilege. The victims' families felt that they were not receiving justice because of these power structures, which favored those with connections and money. However, it is important to note that not all families react similarly when faced with tragedy or crime. Some may become more united while others may crumble under pressure.
How To Get Away With Murder Have you ever seen the TV show How to Get Away with Murder and wondered how many celebrities have murdered someone and got away with it? There have been plenty of celebrities that have committed a crime such as a murder or a tragic car accident. Due to their celebrity status many of those cases have been dropped and got no justice. One of those many celebrities is famous football player Ray Lewis. Ray Lewis was found not guilty for stabbing Jacinth Baker and Richard Lollar due to his celebrity status.
The trial of Casey Anthony was one that struck the nation in a very emotional manner. The trial was on TV for months before anyone could come out with any real answers, and even then, they weren’t the answers they were looking for, and half of them were made up. In the end the jury decided to find her not guilty, while everyone else’s opinion was that she was a cold blooded killer. Unfortunately the proper evidence just wasn’t there in the end to convict her for the first degree murder of her 2 year old daughter Caylee. This being said, if I was on the jury I would definitely have found her guilty because of the, in my opinion, extremely odd behavior that came from Casey during the entire process.
The Missing Third Letter: An Analysis of Letters and Testimony from Sixteenth Century Italian Court Written in the sixteenth century during the Italian Renaissance, a series of letters and testimonies demonstrated a murder case which involved an affair, a betrayal, and a missing piece of evidence. In a court trial, it is essential to have the whole incident substantially evidenced in order to prove a person guilty. If the court trial has to be reviewed again with the missing third letter, will the decision of the court dramatically change? Dr. Thomas Rust and Dr. Jennifer Lynn said that using the sources effectively could be better than having too many sources.
Dexter accurately depicts these kinds of cases and shows a way that the justice system can handle evidence. This will lead to the arrest of criminals. The series also
After a twelve-hour interrogation, Brenton Butler confessed to the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. A key claim made by the defense attorneys in this case was that this was a false confession, and after reaching a verdict of not guilty, the jury clearly agreed. The factors that led the false confession were laid out in a scene during the documentary. Instead of using the interview to discover the truth, the interrogators specifically sought out a confession from the suspect. They began the interrogation with the presumption that Brenton Butler was guilty.
Monique Chavez Professor Wenzell English 100 8 April 2015 Paper #3 The Casey Anthony Trial: The Verdict That Shocked The Nation On July 5, 2011 Casey Anthony was found not guilty of killing her two-year-old daughter, Caylee Anthony, in an Orlando, Florida courtroom. The Casey Anthony murder case became the Social Media trial of the decade, hundreds of people showed up each day to watch the case unfold. Many people arrived to the courthouse before 8 a.m. to secure the best seats.
The case The case study of The Meredith Kercher case is the topic of discussion. The study involves principles related to international criminology and diverse perception on a case of varying judicial and legal implications. The case and the legal procedure of the Italy court highlight how Americans may be portrayed in high-profile cases.