In the case of Johnson v. Laverkin City, a married police officer was punished for having an affair with another married officer from another department while attending a training conference. Sharon Johnson was a police officer for the Laverkin City Police Department. While employed, Ms. Johnson separated from her husband and filed for divorce in 2003. Her husband reacted negatively by violating a protective order and threatening to kill himself and her. While dealing with the divorce, Ms. Johnson was sent to a police training conference and while she was there, she had an affair with another officer that was from a different department. Somehow, her husband found out about the affair and notified her supervisors that she had been raped. Chief Seegmiller conducted an investigation and realized that the affair was consensual and she received no punishment for her actions. This angered her husband, so he made another false allegation. This time he said that Johnson and Chief Seegmiller were involved in an affair together. The …show more content…
So she received a verbal reprimand under the same terms. “The reasoning for the discipline was based upon the law enforcement code of ethics requiring officers to ‘keep [their] private life unsullied as an example to all and behave in a manner that does not bring discredit to [the] agency.’ The reprimand said Ms. Johnson has allowed her personal life to interfere with her duties as a police officer” (Hosier, 2008). Since Ms. Johnson allowed her private life to affect her duties as an officer by engaging in sexual relations with another officer while attending a training conference, which was paid for by the City of Laverkin, she was punished. It was expected of her to carry herself in a way that was acceptable with city and departmental
Name of the Case: Williamson v. City of Houston, Texas 2. Citation: 148 F.3d 462 3. Date Decided: July 22, 1998. 4. Facts: Linda Williamson began working as a police officer in the Houston Police Department “HPD" in 1983.
In 1986, the U.S. supreme court ruled to uphold the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law criminalizing anal and oral sex in private between consenting adults, marking a legal precedent allowing individual states to freely enforce sodomy statutes of their own. This supreme court case, Bowers v. Hardwick, began when Michael Hardwick was found by police having oral sex with another man when they entered his home. Hardwick was charged with sodomy, a felony in Georgia. A preliminary hearing was held with Hardwick, as a self-described practicing homosexual, asserting that the anti-sodomy statute placed him in imminent danger of arrest. He filed suit in Federal District Court, arguing the statute was unconstitutional.
As defined in the Meriam Webster Dictionary the words Supreme Court is the highest court of law in a country or U.S. state. Also defined in the Meriam Webster Dictionary is the words judicial review it is a constitutional doctrine that gives to a court system the power to annul legislative or executive acts which the judges declare to be unconstitutional. In the Supreme Court case of Texas v. Johnson, Gregory Lee Johnson had burned an American flag. He burned the flag because he was protesting the policies that President Ronald Reagan had enacted.
“He was charged under a Texas statute that prohibited desecration of a venerated object (including...a state or national flag).” In 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned the American flag as part of his demonstration against nuclear weapons. It started as an organized protest along the streets of Dallas, and ended up being an offensive act to witnesses of the scene. One could attempt to justify Gregory’s unlawful action as an expression of his First Amendment. However, as a justice on the US Supreme Court, I would have to agree with opinion B, because it appropriately supports the reason for Johnson’s conviction.
The first case of the day that was heard by the Supreme Court on December 13th was Texas v. Johnson. Gregory Lee Johnson, a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade, led a protest at the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas to protest Ronald Reagan’s reelection. During this protest, Mr. Johnson soaked an American flag in kerosene and proceed to burn it. Mr. Johnson was then arrested and charged for violating the Texas state law that prevented the desecration of a venerated object. The proceedings began with statements from the petitioners who claimed that precedent cases such as US v. O’Brien (1968), which deemed that the burning of draft cards was an invalid form of free speech, and Boos v. Barry (1988), which reinforced
United States v. Lopez was the first United States Supreme Court case since the New Deal to set limits to Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The issue of the case was that It exceeded to the power of Congress which had no say over it because the case had nothing to do with commerce or any sort of economic activity. The case United States v. Lopez involved Alfonzo Lopez Jr., Supreme Court Justice William H. Rehnquist, and Congress. Unites States v. Lopez was about a 12th grader named
Before taking a look at this case, think about the following questions. Do students have the same rights under the 4th amendment as adults? , What are students’ rights while being searched on school grounds?, and What guidelines do administrators and teachers need to follow as a result of New Jersey v. T.L.O? The case of New Jersey vs T.L.O involved two freshmen high schoolers who were caught using narcotics in the restroom by a teacher. The teacher took the students to the principal who then asked the students about the incident.
The denial of equal protection claim that was filed was remanded. The courts decided that the Officers involved have qualified immunity. Qualified immunity would not have been granted if the Officer conduct violated Sinthasommphone’s constitutional rights. Analysis
The Case against Davis On May 15, 2006, a woman’s nude body was found outside Bates City, Missouri. The woman had been raped, beaten, and choked, and was later identified as Marsha Spicer. After hearing this news, an old friend of Spicer’s, Lorie Dunfield, paid a visit to the police. Dunfield reported that three months earlier, she had been sexually involved with Richard Davis and he asked her to participate in his “sexual fantasy.”
After I terminated the relationship with the Chief of Police’s niece he approached me several times and spoke about the relationship. He advised me on more than one occasion that his family wants me to be fired from my position as a police officer because of breaking up with her. Shortly thereafter the Chief attempted to discipline me for violations of the department that either did not occur or were not rules or enforced. The Mount Carmel Township Police Officer’s Union and I were forced to argue the decision he made.