Throughout chapter 4 of The Botany of Desire by Michael Pollan, the topic of monoculture is greatly discussed as Pollan’s central theme. Monoculture is seen as a major problem to modern agriculture according to Pollan because it tries to turn something complex into something simple. He discusses the two concepts of biodiversity and monoculture and how they affect modern day agriculture. Pollan discusses many new difficulties that arise from the mass production it provides for everyone. Pollan feels like monoculture is the root problem that many farmers are faced with every year. Monoculture refers to growing the same crop in one area of land. It is seen as the biggest simplification of modern agriculture. The plants are seen as genetically identical because they are all affected by the same thing, such as pesticides. According to Pollan, “Monoculture is at the root of virtually every problem that bedevils the modern farmer, and from which virtually every agricultural product is designed to deliver him” (225). Monoculture requires farmers to adjust their fields to many problems that will arise from their identical plants. All …show more content…
It makes new problems by trying to mass produce a certain crop in one single area. Pollan explained in The Botany of Desire that, “Every new step in the direction of simplification-toward monoculture- leads to unimagined new complexities” (185). Simplification leads to new complexities because we are trying to simplify something that isn’t that simple. We are ignoring half of the problems that come with monoculture by making it something simple. We chose to see what we want to see, but we do not see the big picture. We short term think in regards to agriculture because we only care about what is happening now. We think about the food that it will produce, but we do not think about all the problems it can cause along the
“Industrial agriculture characteristically proceeds by single solutions to single problems: If you want the most money from your land this year, grow the crops for which the market price is highest.” - Wendell Berry Many people question whether or not the morality of treating animals in a humane way outweighs the morality of cheaper food for a nation where 1 in 6 people are facing hunger, and/or starving in any way. Back in the day, a while after World War II, industrial agriculture was applauded as a technological success that permitted an ever growing population to practically feed themselves. Now, many farmers and scientists see it as a blind alley, rather made for factory work.
The writer provides us with a first look into the world of beet picking, through their experience practicing it. The writer asks basic questions to help us understand, and provides very descriptive information about the machines. She shows helps us understand this process through what she sees and dialogue between her and her cousin. In this essay the author is a “participant observer”.
Although he is initially talking about the effects cloning and genetic manipulation has on the plant he then continues on and opens a whole new door to this conversation of cloning. He explains that although this may be a possible way to resolve our needs, it still does have many possible downsides. He then introduces another valuable point by
Relevance between Food and Humans with Rhetorical Analysis In the modern industrial society, being aware of what the food we eat come from is an essential step of preventing the “national eating disorder”. In Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma, he identifies the humans as omnivores who eat almost everything, which has been developed into a dominant part of mainstream unhealthiness, gradually causing the severe eating disorder consequences among people. Pollan offers his opinion that throughout the process of the natural history of foods, deciding “what should we have for dinner” can stir the anxiety for people based on considering foods’ quality, taste, price, nutrition, and so on.
Mult-crop Farming is a practice followed by farmers by cultivating more than one crop. There are many advantages of this type of farming. It helps farmers
Fitting the pieces of corroboration on how the flowers changed the world, a critique The essay “How Flowers Changed the World” is a popular excerpt from The Immense Journey, written by American natural science writer, Loren Eiseley that discusses the significance of the rise of flowers on the evolution of living organisms. Eiseley implied that flowers carry many different significant attributes to the growth of living organisms may it be for animals, for other plants, and for humankind. Loren Eiseley discussed that during the first ages, plants were dependent on water for their growth that led many swamps and watercourses surrounding the earth with the vast and bare land. Moreover, as these plants may adapt these conditions, it can be deemed normal;
He used the average household income of local African farmers as an example of the ineffectiveness of organic agriculture; however, his views have created a number of opponents to his ideas. For example, Ann Lappe, author of “Diet for a Hot Planet” had this to say, “Paarlberg doesn’t get what it means to be organic. Organic farming isn’t just about not using chemicals. Organic farmers improve output by tapping a sophisticated understanding of biological systems to build soil fertility and manage pests and weeds through techniques that include double-dug beds, intercropping, composting, manures, cover crops, crop sequencing, and natural pest control. It could be aptly dubbed ‘knowledge-intensive’ farming.”
As the world went into Anthropocene, the disscussion of the relationship between human and natural became more frequnt than in before. Human being and the inviroment are not isolation based on the theory of Anthropocene, ont he opposite, they art related and effect each other. Mmany authors write literature article based on this new-coming topic, and showed their special undestanding towards it.
In my food?...WHY? Do you want to have an allergic reaction every time you eat something that you favor? How about the question why is it going on , how it’s happening, but you’re not eating the food you’re allergic to? What if I say the scientists and factories are genetically putting genes in one organism to another for the past 10 years. I feel this should have an end to it making us American sickly nationwide.
In the novel The Omnivore's Dilemma, author Micheal Pollan talks extensively about corn. He discusses the ecological, economical, and biological effects it has on humans and our environments. Most often, he brings up the shocking statistic that twenty-five percent of all supermarket items contain corn. Pollan steers away from taking a stance on this, but the strong voice in his writing shows the reader how he feels about corn's prevalence. He, rather obviously, thinks of it as a problem.
In early texts on European farming, agriculture was regarded as “agri and cultura, and food was seen as a vital part of the cultures and communities that produced it.” Today, industrial farming dominates, as food is seen as a product and farming is organized along factory lines (Pretty 54). In the past, agriculture was defined as field cultivation and the harvests were held in high esteem. In our modern world, food is not appreciated as it was and is now a foreign aspect of our lives in both how it is viewed and produced. In the essay “The Pleasures of Eating” by author Wendell Berry, he criticizes how today’s urban population is so blind to how their food is produced and how the food industry does not help people understand.
Rhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.
What is GM food? GM stands for “genetically modified”. Genetically modified food is food that has been produced from organisms which had specific changes introduced into their DNA by making use of genetic engineering. This is done in order for the organism to perform better under harsher circumstances and to improve yield and resistance against pests. Genetic engineering can be used to introduce new traits and also have more control over the genetic structure of the food.