Around the presidential election of 1824, the presidential candidates -John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and Andrew Jackson- took part in the “Corrupt Bargain”, an alliance made between Adams and Clay in order to secure Adams’ presidency. During the Electoral College, Jackson received 99 votes in front of Adams who received 84 votes, while Jackson did receive more votes, he had not gotten a majority of votes, so the House of Representatives were to choose the next president. The spokesman of the House of Representatives, Henry Clay, was to choose between the two candidates. Instead of choosing for the sake of the country, Clay chose to help himself, as Adams had offered him a position as the secretary of state. After Adams’ presidency was secured,
The Corrupt Bargain The election of 1824 was undoubtedly unique, but it seems it may have been the result of a corrupt bargain that John Quincy Adams himself had set up. The election consisted of four different candidates; William Crawford from Georgia, Speaker of the House of Representatives Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams from, and Andrew Jackson from Tennessee. Jackson had a lot of support from the voters because of his role in the battle of New Orleans.
The Election of 1824 had four candidates; Andrew Jackson, William H. Crawford, Henry Clay, and John Quincy Adams. All of them were “Republicans”, yet well-organized parties had not yet started. This election was the first to not have any candidate run as a Federalist. Out of the four candidates, Jackson was by far the most popular, especially in the west, since he was a war-hero. His main rival, Clay felt hatred towards Jackson, and vice versa.
Jackson vs. Clay Andrew Jackson vs. Henry Clay: Democracy and Development in Antebellum America is a book written by Harry L. Watson. Harry L. Watson writes the different stances of the presidential race in the Antebellum Era in America. He is very unbiased in his writing, clearly stating each presidential candidate. Andrew Jackson’s beliefs are clearly democratic, meaning he believed that a growing wealth and power in the business community may erode the equality of ordinary citizens. This party was also known as the ‘Jackson Party’.
The election of 1828 was a rematch between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. 1828 presidential is very different from earlier presidential because of the party organization that promoted Andrew Jackson. Candidates organized their campaigns by using slogans, buttons and have stage events this is to show people who they are and what their capable of doing to better our country. They use this steps to show people who they are and what their capable of doing. Adams and Jacksons are completely a different person, I said that because Andrew Jackson was the first president who was unfortunate or not rich.
When the year of 1807 came around, the way that America elected a president changed. In previous elections, only the rich men were able to vote which as a result whoever promised more the wealth was elected for president. When the common man was able to vote in 1807, the type of candidate to win the election change. As seen in the election of 1828 the person who was more relatable to the people, won because the common man was able to vote and so they used that opportunity and elected whoever they thought was going to help them. Overall the people preferred Jackson over Adams because Jackson was able to relate to the people better, and because he was a symbol of the American dream.
Though many people do not take the time to consider earlier elections, the impact they have made on this country seems inordinate in comparison to many others. The elections of 1824 and 1828 carried many similarities; the candidates in the elections, the challenges during the elections, the political parties, and the conflict between the candidates. Two of the candidates from the election of 1824 ran again in 1828. First, Andrew Jackson, a man made for war, ran for president.
The main issue Andrew Jackson’s campaign faced was his stance and his veto on the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson strongly believed the Second Bank of the United States was unconstitutional. But it was how the Democratic Party and Andrew Jackson handled the issues with specific strategies and tactics that won Jackson reelection. It is safe to say the election of 1832 was anything but ordinary. It was the first election to have the candidates nominated by national nominating conventions in place of the old congressional caucus.
In the United States presidential election of 1828 John Quincy Adams, the current president and member of the National Republican Party, was running for re-election against Andrew Jackson, a former Democratic-Republican turned Democrat. This election was a very personal one, as Jackson and Adams had a tense past. Jackson had also run against Adams four years earlier in 1824, and though he had won the plurality of the popular vote and the electoral college, he lost the contingent election in the House of Representatives (Hogan, Campaigns and Elections, 2017). After this loss Jackson and his supporters accused Adams of having a "corrupt bargain" with Henry Clay, in which Clay helped Adams win the contingent election in return for a position
In the Election of 1824 you got to see John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay in a crooked deal that became known as the “corrupt Bargain”. John Q.Adam agreed to make Henry Clay his secretary of state in return for him to be president. Because of this the next president will not be chosen behind closed doors. The impact the election of 1824 had was it ended the old ways of campaigning and also started the transition into the
The “Eaton Affair” showed that Jackson would help solve one problem, by creating another. The veto of the Maysville Road Bill seemed vacuous, but proved to be positive in the long run. The Trail of Tears and the Indian Removal Act started out fair, but then turned into a tragedy with one poor-planned decision. The Second Bank of the United States controversy created many enemies, but also earned Andrew Jackson re-election. Lastly, Jackson’s reaction to the rejection of Martin Van Buren by the Senate proved to be an opposing statement.
Jackson portrayed himself as the “common man” president and connected with the electors. This was a pretty messy election because Jackson and Clay have been enemies for years. During the election of 1828, Andrew Jackson accuses Henry Clay of killing his wife. John Quincey Adams was running against Jackson and major accusations were being made about both running mates. Andrew Jackson claimed that Adams used tax payer money to buy gambling tools.
Jackson and Henry Clay argued quite a bit. Clay strongly advised Congress that they should renew the bank charter. He claimed that the country was in the middle of a revolution, although not yet a bloody one. He also claimed that Jackson had all of the power and that if Congress did not act the government would fail. Clay asked that the senate impeach Jackson, accusing him of abusing the constitution and the nation’s laws.
(Wikipedia, 2014). Corruption in
Linguistically, the word “corruption” when it used as an adjective it means utterly broken. In a general definition, it is the abuse of using public power on illegal targets or sometimes for personal gain or benefits by the governmental employees. There are many forms of political corruption. The most common are
