Hayley Everts
Candidate Number: 002315 0007
Psychology HL-2
2/26/2015
Word Count: 1,702
Abstract
Write this – summary of experiment
Introduction
Memory can be defined as the faculty by which the mind stores and remembers information, and its psychological study over the years has greatly contributed to our understanding as to how it works. In cases such as eyewitness testimony, it has been revealed by numerous psychologists that the aspect of memory can be unreliable. For example, many of the early studies over memory and cognitive processing (e.g. Bartlett, 1932) demonstrate that memories are not accurate records of our experiences and can often be changed and replicated. The act of remembering is an active process that
…show more content…
In the study, the independent variable was the verb used in the question pertaining to the cars’ speed, i.e. “collided” vs. “smashed,” while the dependent variable was the speed estimated by the 24 participants. To avoid demand characteristics, three extra questions were inserted in order to draw attention away from the question relevant to the estimation of the cars’ speeds. In the standardized instructions provided, we also encouraged the participants to refrain from sharing answers to avoid conformity. To address ethical considerations, the participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any given time and were both briefed and debriefed during the study. The experiment itself aimed at causing no psychological and/or physiological discomfort to the participants, and they all signed a note of informed consent in order to take part in the …show more content…
Before you can participate in this study, I must obtain your consent and the consent of your parent(s).
• You will be briefed and then after the experiment, debriefed on the exact nature of the experiment.
• You have the right to withdraw from the experiment at any time.
• Any results/information/data about you will remain confidential and the final report will include your results only generally in terms of overall statistics and will not specifically report on any one student’s answers/results.
• Your anonymity will be protected and your name will not be identifiable.
• The experiment will be conducted so that you will not be demeaned or harmed in any way.
Thank you for your cooperation! If you have questions, you may contact my teacher, Ms. Rhodes at srhodes@scuc.txed.net; she will verify my involvement in this experiment and address any concerns/questions you may have. Please return by Wednesday, Febuary 4.
Sincerely,
Hayley Everts and Faithmarie Winn
I, ______________, agree to participate in this study. ______________________
Printed Name Student Signature
My child has my permission to participate in this
The experiment showed how our memory can be easily mislead even if we saw it with our own eyes. I believe Gould’s essay is indeed convincing when it comes to whether or not to doubt what people believe they remember is actually
In a study done four years before the rape accord, they found that memories can become contagious and manipulated. If the subject picks a face that is close to the face they are trying to identify, they are more likely to perpetually select that person thereafter (Loftus & Green, 1980). When Jennifer was choosing a suspect from the lineup, she selected Ronald with confidence. Jennifer was later given affirmation by the detective, who told her she chose the same person from the mug shot. Thorndike’s Law of Effect, from almost a century earlier, shows positive feedback to a choice or decision can strengthen a memory in any animal (Thorndike, 1898).
The experiment will take place as planned and only stop if an emergency were to unexpectedly take place. If they decide to keep their names anonymous, subjects will be able to tell us and we will do so. Any questions subjects have will be made beforehand and answered, so no problems come up while the study takes place. If requested, tutors/parents of subjects will receive a copy of the rundown of the experiment and results, as well as recordings including their
Obedience is tested by how long the subject will continue to “shock the victim”. The point of this study is to determine if Americans are obedient even if they know the act is wrong. 2. What is/are the research questions and/or hypothesis/hypotheses? How obedient would subjects be to researchers when it comes to shocking a victim?
This study would have a broad variety of participants that are 21 and over. c. This study will have conditions where the participants are free to make choices of their own. Participants will understand the reason for the study and one hopes to learn when conducting the study. VII.
Eligibility screenings were provided prior to the study, and those excluded in the study contain the following: Students age >35 years (27%), BMI ≥35 kg/m2 (19%) or < .05 was the significance level set by the researcher. 9. Discussion: a. What do the researchers conclude from the results? (1 point) •
Introduction to Human Psychology – PSYC 1111 Written Assignment Unit 4 University of the People Article review on Repressed Memories As stated in OpenStax College (2014) textbook, repressed memories are memories that are so viciously encoded, in the childhood age mostly, that the brain squeezes them into a corner where it will be very difficult for someone to recall them. When in adulthood some or all of the memories can return triggered by an irrelevant stimuli, but they might as well never come to surface at all. According to Loftus (1993), during the 80’s and the 90’s many cases of repressed memories that came to surface, were reported. These reports ended in court with convictions of guilty but of innocent people as well.
Sydney Caparaso Mrs. Sherry AP Psychology 27 August 2015 Witness for the Defense: Elizabeth Loftus Human memory may not, as many think, resemble a permanent tape of our lives ' events, replayable at a whim. Elizabeth Loftus discusses her theories of memory and accuracy in her book, Witness for the Defense. Loftus has testified as an expert witness in more than 150 court cases, several of which she sites, discussing the different ways a memory can be fallible.
The third part of this was a another scan while they were asked from memory to remember the pairs. They were not able to remember many of the pairs. The results showed that the test subjects were able to consciously repress the memory of the second word of the pairs. Proving that the brain is able to repress memories. Based on my research and my own opinions, I was able to ascertain from many accounts that a suppressed memory is most likely to resurface when an incident happens that slightly resembles what occurred of felt in the repressed memory.
The objective of my experiment was to break a norm that would help me study how people would react to something that is not usually said is being said to them. I knew it would not only make people uncomfortable, but I think this
Introduction “Of what use is the memory of facts, if not to serve as an example of good or of evil?” (Alfred de Vigny). Memory encodes various pieces of information that can be utilized in an enormous amount of situations to benefit people. However, memory is also fallible. It alters and creates new memories, changing the original encoded data for unknown reasons.
According to memory researched Elizabeth Loftus of the University of California, Irvine, people can forget fights they had, people they once knew, and all manner of details across time and place. Even eyewitnesses in very serious felony cases – i.e., people who have a big interest in accurately recalling an event – have been known to “remember”
Like a jigsaw puzzle; such as an interviewer may ask a person in a crime scene to assemble pieces of memory of the traumatic event. Frederic Bartlett’s theory of reconstructive memory helps us understand the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Bartlett says that memory recall is focused to subjective interpretation reliant on our cultural norms, values and the awareness of the world we have. Memory is believed to work like a camera, we store information like the camera is recording and playing the clip back is like remembering what was recorded; in the same format it was set. Though it doesn’t work like a camera as people construct and store information in a manner that makes it understanding to them.
Remembering is recalling the facts of the event. One has to remember critical factors in order to start the critical thinking process. The key factors of the event will