ipl-logo

Miranda Rights Still Silent When Being Interrogated By Law Enforcement

516 Words3 Pages

Miranda Rights are more than just words on paper.
Do you think it is important for people who are being interrogated by the authorities to have their Miranda Rights read to them? Some people think that it is important to have their Miranda Rights read to them when being interrogated by the authorities . Some people think that it is not important to have their Miranda Rights read to them when being interviewed by the law enforcement . I think it is important for people to have their Miranda Rights read to them if they are being interviewed by the law enforcement . I think people should have the Right to remain silent when being catechised by enforcement . People should have the Right to have a lawyer present when being questioned by the police. Miranda Rights are more than just words on paper.
I think it is important for people to have their Miranda Rights read to them when they are being questioned by the police. So they will know what they have the Right to. So they will know what they do not have the Right to. So they will know what will happen to them. So they will know what they will be given for court. The Right to remain silent when being questioned by the police is part of the Miranda Rights. I think people should have the Right to remain silent …show more content…

So they have someone else with them when they are being catechised by enforcement . So that the lawyer can talk for the people being query by enforcement . So the lawyer can help them talk to the police. So they can tell their lawyer if what the police is saying is the truth or if it is not the truth .So if it is not the truth they can try to get them out of trouble,but if it is the truth they will still try to get them out of trouble even if the lawyer will have to lie to the police because they pay the lawyer to try to get them out of trouble. Miranda Rights is more than just words on

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    The justice system changed by this case because, the prosecution may not utilize proclamations, regardless of whether exculpatory or inculpatory, originating from custodial cross examination of the respondent unless it shows the utilization of procedural protections powerful to secure the benefit against self-implication. “The apex of the individual-rights emphasis in Supreme Court decisions was reached in the 1966 case of Miranda v. Arizona, which established the famous requirement of a police “rights advisement” of suspects” (Schmalleger, 2018, p. 198). Furthermore the miranda rights are now included in the 5th

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Case In Phoenix, Arizona

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    That is the reason why they made the Miranda rights so it would help the accused and now the police are required to inform the accused what rights he or she has. In my case in Phoenix, Arizona on March, 1963 Ernesto

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Miranda V. Arizona

    845 Words  | 4 Pages

    These mandatory "Miranda Rights" begin with "you have the right to remain silent, anything said can and will be used against you in a court of law. " The police are to enforce this and inform the suspect of his or her right to an attorney and allow for a defendant's attorney to accompany them during interrogations. If they can't afford an attorney, the court must assign one to them. These are the rights denied to Miranda when he signed a statement and confessed, illegally admitting him to

    Read More

  • Police Exception Questions: Miranda V. Arizona

    687 Words  | 3 Pages

    Response: Miranda v. Arizona was a case that focused on four separate court cases that involved custodial interrogations (USC, 2015). Each of these cases involved subjects being questioned by officers in rooms cut off from the general public. The main issue with these interrogations was the fact that none of the subjects were given a full advisory of their rights at the beginning of their

    Read More

  • Principles Of Miranda Vs Arizona Democracy

    569 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the police interrogation, which lasted two hours, Miranda was not informed of his rights which therefore caused him to be interrogated without an attorney present and it led him to self-incriminate himself. The trial “ consisted solely of his confession” (Alex Mcbride n.d.) which caused the court to convict Miranda of rape and kidnapping, sentencing him to 20-30 years in prison. Miranda then went to the Arizona Supreme Court appealing that his confession was unconstitutionally obtained and used against him. When the court disagreed he appealed to the U.S Supreme Court where they declared the actions of law enforcement unconstitutional because they violated the constitution's fifth and sixth amendment. Because of this, Miranda's confession could not be admissible in a court of

    Read More

  • Overview Of Miranda Ruling

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    In March of 1963 a Mexican born immigrant named Ernesto Miranda living in the city of Phoenix, Arizona was chosen in a police lineup by an 18 year old woman who was accusing him of kidnapping and raping her. Miranda was then arrested and questioned by police for several hours before he confessed to the crimes both verbally and in writing. Miranda signed several forms when he confessed to the crimes, including one stating that his confession was completely voluntary and that he understood all his rights. But during the interrogation the police officers did not tell Miranda that he had the right to remain silent, a right granted to him by the Fifth Amendment.

    Read More

  • Essay On Michigan Vs Jackson

    1630 Words  | 7 Pages

    A criminal suspect who decides to answer police questions without an attorney present still has the right to ask for an attorney at any later point. Once a suspect asks for an attorney, all questioning must stop until the attorney arrives.(Findlaw) This is why in the Michigan vs Jackson case why Mr Jackson was able to get away guilty, he asked for an attorney and wasn't given one right away and the police continued to question him, which violates his constitutional rights. So long story short with this case or any case from this case to a case that could happen tomorrow, when making an arrest or even putting someone in custody make sure you and the prisoner know both of your rights because no matter what, even if the guy is a serial killer if his rights are not read or upheld, he can get

    Read More

  • Miranda Warning Dbq

    883 Words  | 4 Pages

    The creation of the United States and the colonies that came before, brought about many legal traditions and precedents. Among these legal traditions and precedents, is an essential precedent present in all interrogation related proceedings and court ones—the Miranda warning. When an individual is detained, they may be subjected to an interrogation by designated officials. During an interrogation certain rights are guaranteed to an individual through the provision of the Bill of Rights to prevent self-incrimination and the historical precedent established before it. However, in certain situations, these rights were not always guaranteed as they should’ve been.

    Read More

  • Earl Warren's Supreme Court Cases

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    The outcome of this case made sure that every person who was arrested and put under the custody of the police had to read their Miranda rights and therefore made known of their Fifth Amendment rights. This case would change the procedure of every legal arrest from that point on, and ensure that any person under the custody of the police would be fully aware of their

    Read More

  • Fifth Amendment Importance

    307 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment is one of 10 amendments included in the U.S. Constitution, it was ratified in 1791 as a component of the Bill of Rights, providing that no person would be required to testify against himself or herself in a malefactor case and that no person will be subjected to a second trial for an offense for which he or she has been duly endeavored anteriorly. This amendment provides for due process of law where the government is seeking to deprive a person of life, liberty, or property and therefore precludes government confiscation of private property for public use without just emolument to the property owner. The Fifth Amendment is important mainly because it protects us from having our rights violated by the government. In

    Read More

  • What Miranda Rights Mean To Me

    700 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the police are asking questions i think the people should have the right to have a lawyer present and the reason to having a lawyer present is to protect you and the lawyer can make the police to stop asking me or anyone questions the lawyer also fights for you in court and if the lawyer is good then you could possibly be set free. that 's why the people of our country should know are constitutional rights, that 's why miranda got arrested in the first place is he didn 't know anything about our rights and he set there and let that cop make him confess and the bad part about all of this is the cop knew the rights but chose not to read them to him,i thank 9f miranda would have known his rights that cop wouldn 't have been able to set there and just keep

    Read More

  • Essay On The Fifth Amendment

    870 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Fifth is for The people In America it is understood that everyone has certain rights at birth that are God given and cannot be taken away by man. The first ten amendments to the constitution, the bill of rights, is a list of these rights. The fifth amendment of the Constitution in the bill of rights states “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous, crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be put in jeopardy of life and limb; nor shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor shall

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    Even though what Miranda did was a violent and horrible action. His trial still brought up controversy in the court system which later turned into a Miranda warning card that police stations around the country use to this

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Civil Liberties

    1030 Words  | 5 Pages

    Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

    Read More

  • We The People Chapter 4 Summary

    501 Words  | 3 Pages

    The book describes the Miranda Rights, which are the legal rights that a person under arrest must be informed before they are interrogated by police. If the arresting officer doesn’t inform an arrested person of his Miranda Rights, that person may walk free from any chargers. The book also talks about double jeopardy, double jeopardy is the right that prohibits a person from been tried twice for the same crime. In other words if a person is found innocent and sometime later new evidence surface that can incriminate him with the crime that he is “innocent” he cannot be charged for that same crime. The book also mentions self-incrimination, which is the right that no citizen will have to be a witness against himself.

    Read More

More about Miranda Rights Still Silent When Being Interrogated By Law Enforcement

Open Document