Why has Loblaw’s strategy been successful? Loblaw success can be attributed to its efficient operations, its customer loyalty programs, the popularity of its private label brands, and large-scale purchasing efficiencies. Loblaw has showed a good understanding of the Canadian grocery market due to its time-tested strategy. The company has presence in virtually all Canadian provinces with a tailored value chain that helps them achieve high revenue and standards. Additionally Loblaw offers competitive wages and benefits. Loblaw effective use of the 4+2 strategy had made it the market leader. The excellent execution of its strategy has allowed the company to be a differentiator among other Canadian grocers (especially with its President’s choice brand) and capturing about 32% of the Canadian grocery market shares. See Loblaw’s SWOT analysis below. Table 1. Loblaw SWOT Analysis Should …show more content…
Although the Loblaw has majority market share holds, the company faces intense competition from many types of grocers such as Sobeys Inc., Metro Inc., Walmart; and many types of non-traditional competitors, such as drug stores, warehouse clubs and specialty stores (organics & ethnics). High rivalry intensity makes an industry more competitive and potentially decrease profit margins. Entry Barriers: As there are fierce rivalry between competitors, the barriers to entry in the Canadian grocery market is high. The large food retailers account for the majority of the market revenue in Canada. Thus, smaller interdependent retailers can’t really compete with such-alike Loblaw or Sobeys or Walmart. The price of raw materials is high with low consumer switching cost. However, the increasing demand for healthy and organic food is creating openings for smaller competitors to enter and hide from the pricing
The topic highlighted in the article about Loblaw’s shutting down 22 of its stores and starting up a home delivery service actually has a huge impact on Canada, Canadians and America. As indicated in the article, Lowblaws is teaming up with the American home delivery grocery service, Instacart. By doing this Lowblaws will now become available all over Canada through the website of Instacart. This has huge affect on Canadian businesses because it opens up the door to competition in the retail empire. For example, as learned in class, once a company does something different and becomes successful over it, other companies start following the trend and sooner than later, every company in the same felid starts to do it.
Lowes and Home Depot have been in competition with each other since the beginning of their existence. They are similar in many ways and different in many others. When looking at the functional strategies employed by each of the industry giants it is easy to see where they differ and where the similarities exist. Both of the companies operate with a corporate strategy of growth to meet the full market potential and captivate as much of the market as they can. Parnell (2014), reports that competitive strategy and marketing functional strategy go hand in hand.
1. Rivalry among existing competitors The retail industry is extremely competitive. Here in Canada we enjoy large well established retailers such as Hudson Bay, Costco, and Canadian Tire. According to Statistics Canada “Chain stores, defined as operating four or more locations within the same industry group and under the same legal ownership, have been incrementally increasing market share for more than 10 years” .
Competitive Advantage & Strategy Real Canadian Superstore definitely uses growth as their work strategy. They constantly try to improve the company and add things so that they can receive more revenue. They add their own brands, such as PC, and they add departments such as Joe Fresh. They also use co-operative strategy because some store are paired up with dry cleaners to help improve both companies.
In 1964, Tim Horton, a National Hockey League Legend opens the first store in Hamilton where coffee and donuts were served at cost of 10 cents each. Furthermore, in 1967 partnership with Ron Joyce make the first franchise. In 1976, Timbits is introduced and Canadian icon is created. After they created an icon, first Tim Hortons opens in Quebec and make a universal beverage that is double. Once they started attracted more customers in 1980s muffins and cookies were introduced and create something new to drink coffee.
The five forces that drive industry competition and profitability are: rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Tootsie Roll encountered three of the five forces in the Tootsie Roll Case Study: rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, and bargaining power of buyers. The first force that Tootsie Roll encountered was competition among other snack food manufacturers, which include Hershey, M & M Mars, Nestle, Brach, Huhtulmac, Storck, and RJR Nabisco. Yet, the trend of increasing health conscientiousness provided Tootsie Roll with a competitive advantage because their candy has zero cholesterol
Trader Joe’s is a small, American grocery store chain that would benefit from expanding internationally into the Canadian market. As we have seen in recent months, Target Corp. just pulled all of their locations out of Canada, but this is largely due to the fact that their international strategy did not fit well with the Canadian market. This paper will outline why Trader Joe’s is a good retailer for international expansion, why Canada mixes well with their business strategy as a country to expand to, the strategic plan Trader Joes should engage in during expansion, and five strategic recommendations that lead to Trader Joe’s advantages in
Focusing on the needs of the buyer is also a focus of the firm, they can create products that specifically cater to the needs of their customers. This can be seen when the begin rotating season goods for their customers or bringing in more natural foods due to trends involving customer fitness and eating healthier foods. This strategy is appropriate, this was the firm’s original strategy when it was founded in the late 60s, and it hasn’t changed all that much. The corporate-level strategy resembles that of an organic growth strategy. Rather than opting for an external approach and follow say an Amazon by acquiring Whole Foods to enter the business, Trader Joe’s has followed an internal approach for their corporate-level strategy.
Running head: pantry inc. case analysis 1 pantry inc. case analysis 20 Pantry Inc. Case Analysis Sekia Grimes GEB5787 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Industry Analysis 4 General Environment 4 Sociocultural………………………………………………………………………………4 Political/Legal…………………………………………………………………………… .4 Economic…………………………………………………………………………………5 Porter’s Five Forces ……………………………………………………………………………... 5 Rivalry……………………………………………………………………………………5 Threat of New Entrants…………………………………………………………………..
Competitive Situation In today’s competitive markets, organizations must remain proactive and innovative to fight off competitive to hold majority share of their respected market. For an organization to determine the degree of their competitive advantage and its sustainability, a look into their external analysis is required. This portion of the report will examine and analyze Tim Hortons Coffee and Bake Shop’s external environment vis-à-vis their internal strength and weaknesses to determine their competitive situation. This analysis will focus on Porter’s Five Forces to determine their competitive situation.
Specifically, Ralph’s (similar stores are Vons and Albertson’s) and Whole Foods (similar stores are Gelson’s and Trader Joes) are two firms that utilize cost leadership and differentiation. On one hand, we have Ralph’s using cost differentiation by providing a broad range of merchandise at a decent price. On the other hand, we have Whole Foods that has implemented a differentiation strategy by marketing their merchandise as healthier (organic). The trade of for both companies is that they are attracting less consumers by just marketing to a specific crowed. For instance, if Whole Foods had lowered their price and still sold premium merchandise, soon Ralph’s would be in trouble.
Another company is Sysco, a food-service distributor in the U.S. Porter demonstrates that “It led the move to introduce private-label distributor brands with specifications tailored to the food-service market, moderating supplier power. Sysco emphasized value-added services to buyers such as credit, menu planting, and inventory management to shift” (Porter, 2008, p. 90). Like Paccar, Sysco knows how to make them different from their competitors in the high competitive industry. In food industry, customers is very sensitive with price because they have many options for substitute, so companies must have a competitive prices. However, Sysco decides that they should add values to their products and improve connection with their suppliers.
For one, don’t forget that WFM is one of the largest public food and drug retailers in the United States. In fact; it is a Fortune 500 company, ranking number 232 on the 2013 list. Its size gives it the ability to negotiate better deals for its produce and products; which smaller organic grocery chains cannot. So; in the event of increased food costs; the whole industry will be under pressure but bigger companies will still have negotiation and pricing power edge over smaller chains.
Walmart, Amazon, and EBay 1. Analyse each of these companies using the value chain and competitive forces models. The value chain model of Amazon in itself is internally and operationally the best that adds value and maintains competitive advantage. The primary activities include Inbound logistics for example quality control, receiving, raw materials, control and supply schedules; Operations for example packaging , maintenance, quality control; Outbound Logistics for example
A critical review of the retailer was carried out based on the external factor analysis using PESTLE (Political, Economic, Sociological, Technology, Legal and Environmental) and using Porter’s Five Forces Model of Competition to understand the correlation between suppliers, buyers, competitors within an industry, potential competitors, and alternative solutions to the problem being addressed. Background of the Company Giant was founded by the Teng family as a simple grocery store in one of the suburbs of Kuala Lumpur in 1944. Acquired by Diary Farm in 1999, Giant’s mission was to offer a wide variety of products at the lowest possible prices and closer to residential areas. Key to Giant’s growth is the ability to continuously offer value for money products and the core principles are retained even while pursuing the international brand status.