“The villain is the person who knows the most but cares the least,” This quote comes from Chuck Klosterman. A villain means that you don’t care about other people and they are just selfish and mean. Alexander the Great is a villain because he killed a lot of people and destroyed many towns and cities.
Alexander the Great is a villain because killed a lot of people. People who kill other people for really no reason are villains. Alexander killed many people just because they did something little to his civilization. According to TCI “Philip wanted to attack Persia next, but, in 336 B.C.E., he was murdered. His son, Alexander, was the new Macedonian king.” (TCI the last section). A website states that Alexander murdered his dad (Cite in Bibliography). Alexander wanted to be king but he didn’t have to kill your dad for the spot. Alexander got king when he was 20 and people say he was great for that but really he just killed his dad that was king to get the spot for king and that 's just selfish. Alexander the great
…show more content…
Many might say that Alexander is a hero because of his bravery and leadership. People need to look at the bad side of Alexander to see him as a villain, so here is a great piece of evidence. According to Google “Cleitus the Black (Greek: Κλεῖτος ὁ μέλας; c. 375 BC – 328 BC) was an officer of the Macedonian army led by Alexander the Great. He saved Alexander 's life at the Battle of the Granicus and was killed by him in a drunken quarrel several years later” (type “who did alexander the great kill” on google). This proves everyone wrong that thinks Alexander is a hero because why would you kill someone if they saved you. Some will say that he didn’t mean to because he was drunk but that isn’t an excuse because why would you get drunk if you are the leader. If you 're the leader you need to be in charge of your civilization, Instead he was being dumb and made the wrong decision of killing someone that saved you. This is clear evidence that he was a
He killed over 100,000 men in only four major battles. Alexander went on a “ferocious manhunt” (Doc C) and ended up crucifying two thousand men and selling 30,000 into slavery. Only immoral men crucify and enslave just because they can’t have something. He can never be great because of how brutal he was. A bad person can never
Alexander would have been a hero would he have lived twice his age. Plutarch notes that Alexander tamed Bucephalus a horse that Philoneicus gave his father as a present by and thought it was wild and untameable. Ideally, the single act indicated that Alexander had the skill of handling issues that most people think cannot be contained and this would have made him a hero (Source 1). Quintus indicates that the talk between Darius III and an Athenian exile indicates how magnificent the Macedonian army was under Alexander the Great.
"Hell isn't merely paved with good intentions; it's walled and roofed with them, yes, and furnished" once said Aldous Huxley. This is very much true in the story of Julius Caesar. In Julius Caesar, Brutus murdered his friend Julius in cold blood, and felt extremely guilty afterwards. For the reason of the guilt, Brutus is a traitor. Brutus did make the decision in favor of his homeland, but his good intentions "walled and roofed" his hell.
People today argue whether he is a hero or a villain, but he is a villain because he was cruel to every one of his enemies, he became extremely power hungry, and mercilessly killed people. Alexander was cruel to people. First
He had very high standards at a very young age and surpassed those standards instantaneously (“Alexander the Great Biography”). One can infer that many looked up to Alexander and respected him. God believes that everyone is created equal; no matter if one is a slave, or a pawn, or a king, they are all equal in the eyes of God. However, when the time came, both of these people died.
Alexander killed an estimated of 100,000 enemy soldiers, and innocent civilians throughout his rein. (Doc. E). He killed all these people just because he wanted more land to gain more power. Most of these people did nothing to Alexander and had no affect on his life except they were an obstacle in the way of him gaining more power. Also Alexander killed a full army in East India because he saw a major opportunity to take control of land from one of the biggest empires.
Alexander pouring the water explains why he was great because even though his men had given him water, he refused to drink it, for his men were just as thirsty as he was. Allowing the cities to surrender explains why he was great because it shows that he wasn’t a harsh leader that just seizes control, he lets the city decide to surrender in return for kindness. In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a strong, skilled leader. Alexander the Great did show some qualities of a bad leader.
He was determined to uphold his fathers dream and take control of Persia. Alexander was considered strategic in his battles and wasn’t scared to go first before his army into war. His appreciation and sympathy for religion and his troops is what makes him such a heroic leader. By these
He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
Contrary to popular belief, the young Alexander III of Macedonia was not as amazing as he is often portrayed to be. Alexander was born in 356 BCE and his father (Phillip of Macedonia) actually began the conquering of the large empire Alexander would one day rule. King Philip conquered nearby Greek city-states and had planned to conquer the Persian Empire, but before he was able to complete this attempt he was assassinated. Alexander, in 336 BCE, at the age of 20 years old had become the king of Macedonia. He completed his father’s attack on Persia and died after becoming ill in June of 323 BCE.
(Green, document C). Alexander may have just destroyed a city for his empire, but he showed concern by sparing the lives of those who took refuge. This proves that Alexander shows concern because the least he could do in the situation was make sure the victims were okay, and he did that. He spared the lives of the victims who took refuge. Clearly, there are reasons Alexander could be considered not great, but he shows outstanding qualities that prove
A villain- a character whose evil actions or motives are important to the plot. Macbeth’s greed for power is what shaped him to be the villain in the play. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Macbeth, despite the good Macbeth had done in the very beginning his actions throughout make him the villain.
Alexander was fearless of what other leaders could have done to him and his men, he was so fearless he even stood on the front line with his men, unlike today when the leaders sit back in safe zones while their men die for their
Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.
Villain, a character whose evil actions or motives are important to the plot. Just like the definition of villain states, they show traits just like macbeth. In Shakespeare 's “ The Tragedy of Macbeth”, the character Macbeth is displayed as the villain throughout the play. Macbeth shows the readers that his amiton gets in the way and makes him do things that are considered “evil” until the end of the play. Macbeth is thinking to himself that it is not fair that Duncan 's kids will become king so he kills Duncan and has his sons flee.