National supremacy McCulloch v. Maryland was a supreme court case held back in 1819 concerning the topic of national bank and taxation. This court was like many more that came before it and after it as it was the national government and states government arguing in front of the supreme court. The bank was a national bank created in Maryland being the second ever created national bank. The case all took course after Maryland the state questioned the power of Congress being able to create a national bank. Then the state of Maryland imposed a tax on all branches of bank not “chartered by the legislature.” This tax was aimed directly at the national bank as they were the only bank not charted the tax was a 15,000 dollar annual fee. The McCulloch …show more content…
This also imposed that all banks were prohibited from issuing bank notes except on stamped paper approved by the state. The reason for this was in 1818 the state banks started to fall during the depression and they blamed the fall on the national bank. Maryland then created a hefty tax on any bank not charted within the state the national bank was the only bank not charted within the state (McBride Alex). Then the second national bank opened and issued these bank notes without complying with the states law. Maryland then tried to sue the McCulloch a cashier at the national bank for not complying.The McCulloch v. Maryland all was a supreme court case originally questioned does Congress have the power under the constitution to incorporate a bank even though it isn't clearly said in constitution? The other argument was does the state of Maryland have the power to tax an institution created by congress? The reason for Maryland trying to sue McCulloch was because they wanted money and he wasn't following state law …show more content…
This supreme court decision expressed national power more than many. This decision showed how much more power the national government has then the states within the nation. It was in this ruling that they reminded the nation that the constitution is just meant to be a basic outline of general ideas that are easily understood by the public (Jones Martin). If I was the supreme court I feel that I would've made a very similar decision. Reason being is that the national government should have much more power of states controlling what is right and what isnt. Their act of taxation was a obviously a ploy for money and a way to get back at the national bank for slowing down the states banks business. I would have ruled that Congress has the power to open a national bank wherever they please and that they avoid all taxation as it is the nations bank (Pearson
McCreary County v. ACLU (2005) Pinson, 4 McCreary County v. ACLU Asher Pinson Liberty High School AP US Government, 2A McCreary County v. ACLU was a significant case for the Establishment Clause, freedom of religion, and the First Amendment itself. This case made its way into the Supreme Court in the later part of 2004, and a decision was reached in the middle of 2005. This case extended the power of the Establishment Clause to prohibit the public display of religious texts in government-funded buildings.
State of Maryland decided to impose a tax to exempt every bank in Maryland expect the Bank of the US. James Muculloch was the cashier of the Baltimore branch. When the bank’s Baltimore branch refused to pay the tax,Maryland sued James Muculloch. The Bank’s Baltimore branch refused to pay the annual tax of $15,000 in top of this was a $500 penalty for any state that violated the statute. McCulloch was convicted by a Maryland court of violating the tax statute because he refused to pay and was fined $2,500.
Webster argued the Constitution was design to settle such economic disputes between states. Allowing concurrent laws to conflict would be dangerous and contagious if not handled by the federal government. Attorney Writ supported the federal supremacy over these states was enumerated in the Constitution. Gibbons’ steamboats operated “among several states” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.), and the Commerce Clause states, “ Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among several States, and with Indian tribes” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.). Gibbons’ steamboats in fact operated in New Jersey and in New York; therefore it aptly applied in this situation.
They argued that as a sovereign state they could tax and control business inside their borders. Also they claimed that taxing banks was necessary to control and prevent any possible financial abuses. Furthermore, they argued that if the federal government had regulations on state banks Maryland could have regulations on the federal banks. Lastly, they argued that there was no authority included in the Constitution to charter a national bank, causing the Bank of the United States to be unconstitutional. Maryland imposed a tax on all the banks not chartered by the state.
Thus lead to the case of McCulloch v. Maryland on February 22, 1819 and was later decided on March 6th, 1819. This case was questioned using the Constitution and holding for unconstitutionally handling the bank. c. Opinion: The ruling for this particular case was under the Article I, Section
This act required that many documents such as licenses, diplomas, contracts and even playing cards to be printed on embossed paper that had a tax on it. This act was the very first attempt to tax the colonists directly for activities that occurred solely with the colonies themselves. After the French and Indian War the British national debt skyrocketed and the Prime Minister was eager to pay it down before the government was bankrupted.
A lesson that would be stated repeatedly throughout his verdicts but never truly understood by citizens until the Civil War is that the states are subservient to the federal government, or that state law trumps federal law. For example in McCulloch vs. Maryland, where Maryland wanted to tax the building of a new national bank, where Maryland lost the case, as federal legislature supersedes state legislature. In this case, the legislation for a new bank trumped taxation of it. Furthermore, a more specific case of this issue is in the earlier case of Fletcher v. Peck, where Marshall declared the state law revoking the corrupt sale of land by bribed politicians was unconstitutional as the sale was good at the time of the land being sold, thus it is unconstitutional to revoke the sale of what was already sold. As true with both, it is shown that state government is weaker than federal government to ensure that a strong nation is run as one, rather than being pulled from each end by state governments.
In both the McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden cases, John Marshall asserted the power of judicial review, and legitimatized the Supreme Court within the national government. The Marshall Court, over the span of thirty years, managed to influence the life of every American by aiding in the development of the judicial branch and establishing a boundary between the state and national government. John Marshall’s Supreme Court cases shaped how the government is organized today. He strongly believed in Federalism, and that the national government should be sovereign, rather than the states. The Supreme Court under John
State affairs were now allowed to been seen in the Supreme Court thanks to Marshall’s permission and ruling of the case. John Marshall’s conception of
Gordon 's premise in Hamilton 's Blessing is that the national debt can be used positively in order to boost the economy of a country like the United States. In the book, Gordon uses economic history and theory to examine the start, rise and decline of the United States debt. The author opens his book by stating that this country was born in debt, and this debt has become so high that concerned individuals no longer think about it. Hamilton 's Blessing charts the history of the national debt since when the central bank of the United States was founded in 1971, up to modern days. The intellectual architect of this creation was Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary as well as a central figure who had a deep impact on the economic
Andrew Jackson thought that the government should be a part of the Second United States Bank, but Nicholas Biddle, the Second United States Bank’s president, knew that the government should not be able to control the economy, which I agree with (Andrew Jackson Takes on the Bank of the US). The senate approved a charter for The Second
Many congressmen argued that a bank like this was unconstitutional, possessed a monopoly on money, and favored the commercial north over the argurutlural South. The First Bank of the United States was created in 1791. However twenty years later in the year of 1811, opponents
The War of 1812 had affected the nation 's economy, which caused many banks throughout the nation to weaken and eventually shut down. Congress had granted a charter to the Second Bank of the United States in 1816 and supplied one-fifth of its capital of 35 million dollars. Local bankers, farmers, politicians had viewed the bank as an image of power which caused the people disfavor the bank. Many of the States were disappointed with the new Second Bank of the United States. Out of all the States, one particular state that was unhappy was Maryland.
Asia Pratka The first President of the United States, George Washington, and the first Congress set out to create a new banking system for the United States to help its taxing and spending powers become more fluid. Could the federal government create a National Banking system? Twenty-eight years later, McCulloch v. Maryland established the constitutionality of the necessary and proper clause through the Supreme Court. However, was the Supreme Court the right venue to decide if the necessary and proper clause instituted by Congress is constitutionally liberal or expressed, or should "We the People" have the decision?
Maryland there was the issue of whether or not the state had the power to tax the federal government. Also, if the United States can establish a national bank even though not directly mentioned in the Constitution. In this case, Justice Marshall defined the Necessary and Proper Clause and the National Supremacy Clause. A National Bank was needed to be created to carry out the enumerated powers. The creation of the bank was justified because though not clearly mentioned with the Constitution, other powers were mentioned such as the power to collect taxes, to loan money, and to regulate commerce.