Throughout time, there have been many books written, that public schools have banned forvarious reasons. One of the many books includes Lady Chatterley’s Lover written by DHLawrence. Throughout this paper I will be explaining a basic outline of the book, why the authoreven wrote it, and why it was banned from certain public schools.Lady Chatterley’s Lover starts off with Connie Reid who is the protagonist throughout thewhole book. After introducing Connie, they then introduce her husband whose name is CliffordChatterley. It pretty much all begins with him returning from World War I. When he returns, heis paralyzed from the waist down. Throughout time, Connie Chatterley begins to get frustratedwithout making love. Clifford ends up writing some deep, mysterious, and sort of sad stories.These stories were written about love and sex. His stories eventually become somewhat popular,and people come and converse about him and his stories. One person in particular that came …show more content…
Whether people in school are mature enough to read it and take all of the explicitcontent is up to them, and obviously they know what they’re getting into when they begin to readit. Having a book published and for people to read it and dislike it and ban it from certain places,must feel awful. I don’t think books should be banned in high school, obviously don’t allowelementary or middle school kids to read it, but it is his way of expressing himself. Humans tendto have a big issue on not judging when another is expressing their form of being, and this is acase where people may have gone a bit too
Also, the teachers of the high school are described by Kurt to be ignorant and are not aware of what the books are about and what they truly mean. The leaders that banned books in F451 aren’t aware of what books are really about and just decided to ban them most likely in fear of individualism. In addition,
The book Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut is perceived as being controversial; it was once placed on some schools' banned reading lists. Numerous parents disagreed with much of the content presented in the book. It is perceived as being too inappropriate and vulgar to certain audiences because of the language used and the topic of sex. Because it does contain mature topics, this book should be banned for grades below high school, but it should also not be a reading requirement for high school students.
and i used three different texts below from the articles I got. Then, I decided to use these three texts from each of the articles because two of them mostly talked about decisions people came up during the 1950s and now with to decide whether they should ban books depending on their views of what’s right or wrong. This text tells us that there is no point in banning books because many kids these days are aware of sex, gender, violence etc. However the Keller high school is considering banning these types of books with sexual, violence or anything that could be inappropriate for the school district.
Lady Chatterley’s Lover The act of banning books have been around since 1982 and more than 11,300 have been banned since that time for various reason such as profanity, politics, religion, and explicit writing. For example, the bible was banned from schools for religious viewpoints on Christianity. Many people have various opinions on banning and challenging books; some may even see this action as a violation of our constitution. Sometimes copies of books would be smuggled into different countries because the people of that country were unable to obtain the books they wanted to read.
The content of this book isn't so horrible to the point where students can’t read them. If a student is interested in reading about young teens running away and doing drugs, then they should be able to. An adult shouldn't determine what is best for a young reader to
According to the American library association "A banning is the removal of those materials. Challenges do not simply involve a person expressing a point of view; rather, they are an attempt to remove material from the curriculum or library, thereby restricting the access of others. " American library association. I would like to point out that if you read this book you will understand right away why this book is banned in schools and libraries and an author from comic book legal defense fund spoke with a superintendent at
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Just because a book that was written many decades ago may have bad words in it, doesn’t mean that it should be withheld from the students. Additionally, the educational value of, The Catcher in the Rye would be totally lost if a book is banned just for containing “explicit” language. Sophomore students are at the age where they are old enough to know what is appropriate and what isn’t and they can read a book that has bad words in it. If a book is banned because of its explicit content, that overshadows the educational content and the moral lessons that the reader would take away from reading this book.
A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.
Others have decided not to ban it, because of the first amendment. Although banning Fahrenheit 451 would be an infringement on the author's right to speak freely, the long-lasting mental and physical devastation to the children reading this book that arises as a result of
It isn't just a good book but provides a lot of information and the best part is that it is from the author's perspective and personal experience. The book talks about what the author had to go through with his father when he was placed in the concentration camp. It provides historical information about what the jews had to go through and how they were treated. I also believe that books like this don't just entertain or inform us but give us a better perspective of the world and our place in it . Banning it will not just restrict the book from the parents' child but restrict it from other kids who would want to read it
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
Eliza Haywood writes the cautionary tale Fantomina in order to instruct women against pursuing their sexual desires. The protagonist, an unnamed “Lady of distinguished Birth” (41), secretly pursued her desires for Beauplaisir under the guise of four different personas, ultimately leading to the ruin of her reputation and being sent to live in a monastery. I will refer to the main character when she is not disguised as the protagonist to avoid confusion. I will be discussing female sexuality, where I will be focussing on certain aspects including sexual identity, sexual behaviour, and how social and religious aspects affect this sexuality. I will argue that Haywood uses the cautionary tale in order to represent female sexuality as distinguishable