In the essay, “The Ethics of Belief” by William K. Clifford, Clifford argues how one believes is not only responsible for self, but for others as well (Burger, 2008). He believes that one should not believe something without sufficient evidence or vigilant reasoning because you are morally obligated to others. Additionally, Clifford does not consider belief and action to be unconnected, because beliefs can result in actions that affect others. Clifford uses a shipowner sending an emigrant-ship out to sea as an example. Initially, the shipowner has reservations about his ship being old and needing an expensive overhaul to be deemed seaworthy as suggested by some experienced personnel. However, he convinces himself the ship will be fine because it had made this trip safely on numerous occasions. Instead of paying to have the ship overhauled and trusting the word of more experienced personnel, he loads families aboard and unfortunately, the ship goes down and all the passengers are lost. …show more content…
In other words, how is he able to determine whether the ship was or was not sea-worthy? The shipowner had a moral obligation to seek evidence to back his beliefs because he was responsible for the lives of several passengers. Clifford uses this to demonstrate that our beliefs can affect others, therefore, our beliefs can be morally good or bad. Regardless, if the action results in something bad or not, Clifford holds each person responsible for assuring your beliefs are not lacking sufficient evidence because “no belief held by one man, however seemingly trivial the belief, … is ever actually insignificant or without its effect on the fate of mankind …” (Burger, 2008, p.
It is made clear the dangers every man on that ship risked. By going on the fishing voyage, they were subjecting themselves to however long in complete isolation with only each other and the
An English yacht with a group of four men; Tom Dudley, Edwin Stephens, Edmund Brooks, and Richard Parker sails from Southhampton to Sydney, Australia on May 19th, 1884. Unfortunately, after 48 days (July 5th, 1884) on the sea, the yacht sank about 1600 miles off the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa. The four men were able to get on an open lifeboat, but had no supply of fresh water and had only two 1 pound cans of turnip. The four desperately tried to survive with all there were available, but after 17 days of being lost in the middle of the sea, they reached their breaking points. On the 18th day, Dudley, Stephens, and Brooks discussed the possibility of sacrificing one person for the rest of the group, and they all had the same person in mind; Richard Parker.
For this essay my book is the Princess Bride by William Goldman. This book is a fantasy, fairy tale, with some humor mixed in to keep things light when the books has dark elements. The two Countries Florin and Guilder are on the verge of war and the prince needs to marry before he can take the throne and his father is dying. The princess of Florin has no hair so the prince refuses to marry her so they take him to a reluctant buttercup.
I have reviewed and read the article carefully. 4. Jim Sullivan’s article “The Mother of All Parbuckles” argues that modern technology parbuckling applies to a centuries-old technique that raised the 2012 luxury liner Costa Concordia in mid-2014, from the ocean bay. In January 2012, the Costa Concordia ran aground in a marine reserve off Italy’s Giglio Island; killing 32 people at the process. Settling on its starboard side on two undersea rock ledges.
Once they arrived at the docks, the engineers worked frantically to find out the problem that caused the engines to fail. They had found out that someone forgot to take a zero out of the programming in the software. This caused the system to undergo a buffer overflow error. Then, the buffer overflow error caused the ship to fail because dividing by zero is undefined. After they identified the problem, it took a crew of engineers two whole days to fix the problem.
On one dreadful night an enemy ship crashed into Kennedy’s boat resulting the boat to go up in flames, torn apart, and a stranded crew. However, Kennedy did not let these things interfere with getting remaining men to safety and out of harm’s way. After hours and hours of constant swimming and extreme dehydration, Kennedy somehow manages to get to an island along with his friend Ross. John Hersey portrays Kennedy as a courageous individual. The audience becomes well aware of the hard work that he puts in.
This ship was Discovery and was sailed by Captain Weymouth. When they got going, Hudson couldn 't control his crew at all, and there was fighting and even mutiny within the first few months. By the end of the year the crew was stuck hundreds of miles south and unable to turn back. They went ashore and stayed on land until late spring. By spring, the crew wanted to go home when a small portion wanted to continue the exploration and fights led by Robert Juet broke out.
Simply put, the mother’s distance from the refugee has not effect on her moral obligation to help. If the mother has the power to save the drowning from half way across the world then she ought to do it. Her argument that her child is closer than the refugee; therefore, she will help her child over the refugee fails. I do agree with Singer on his point that distance/proximity have no effect on our moral
In the essay “Ethics of Belief” by William K. Clifford he argues that it is morally wrong to believe things without good evidence and we should never trust something without sufficient evidence. William James thesis in “The Will to Believe” states is that it is completely normal for us to sometimes belief something that does not have sufficient evidence, if we judiciously want to believe that is true; that we are free to choose to believe anything we want to believe. In this paper, I will show how this James believes Clifford is wrong because he trusts that it is right to believe something without having evidence and how they both back up their opposite ideas. To argue his thesis, Clifford provides an example of a ship-owner whose boat sank
So, finally, he decides he can’t carry it. But how to set it down? No way. A problem without a solution. And so, because he can’t figure out how to solve the problem he decides to destroy it” (Guest, 224) Conrad Jarrett blames himself for not saving his brother from drowning in the water next to the sailboat.
By choosing the believing game,I was able to overcome this struggle and was given a deeper understanding on how to deal with future issues. In order to examine how the believing game can bring a positive outcome compared to the doubting game, Elbow’s essay needs to be examined. My personal experience will be shared, and I will discuss why believing had a positive impact and left me with a deeper understanding. Throughout Elbow ’s essay, the reader is given the definition and rules for each of the two games, being believing and doubting.
William K. Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” is an essay about justification and how we are morally required to prove our beliefs. Clifford’s theory throughout the essay was “It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.” Clifford thinks that it is a moral obligation for you to confirm each of your beliefs with sufficient proof, no matter how questionable or insignificant the beliefs may be. I believe he thinks this because beliefs have serious effects and consequences on others.
Jim and his crewmates travel to the distant treasure island and have multiple disputes throughout the diverse crew. The adventurous journey by Jim and his crew show the difficulties and hardships pirates can face out at sea to reach their goal of simply finding buried treasure.
One does not have to act against the good of ‘play’ in order to save the drowning child. This therefore shows that there does not need to be an intention to act against any of the basic goods. I propose that there is a positive duty to save the child’s life on the criteria of fairness. This is because the sailor can resume sailing some other time, whereas the child’s life cannot be resurrected at a later date. If the sailor continues to sail as opposed to saving the child’s life, he will be guilty of an immoral act in omitting to save the child, where he would not have majorly risked his own life.