Introduction: A Basket of Deplorable(s): Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton’s Use of the Word Deplorable Before addressing the quote-on-quote controversial word used by the Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton to describe half the supporters of the Republican Nominee Presidential Nominee Donald Trump Campaign, it is important to make one fact clear. Regardless of the political spectrum, presidential candidates support, presidential candidates should never negatively described their opponents’ group of supporters and/or voters. In other words, attacking presidential candidates’ campaign is one factor, but attacking their supporters is another issue within itself, which causes more harm than good. In a regrettable manner, …show more content…
From a personal standpoint, when observing the Merriam Webster Dictionary’s definition of the word deplorable, the definition provided an accurate description of another particular person in general. For instance, stroking the fears of racism and bigotry intensely describes the deplorable behavior of the Republican Presidential Nominee Donald Trump. From a personal perspective, if having the opportunity to provide an alternative definition of the word deplorable, the definition would consist of this: An unacceptability of intolerable and dreadfulness characterization caused by an individual’s behavior (actions) or describing a condition of some sort. Moreover, when continuing back to the Democratic Presidential Nominee Clinton’s description of the Republican Presidential Nominee Trump’s supporters as a basket of deplorable(s), she has acknowledged that she regrets making that particular statement. However, on a final note, if the Democratic Presidential Nominee Clinton only described former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and white nationalist David Duke and Republican Presidential Nominee Donald Trump as deplorables, the word would perfectly fit the
Nicholas Kristof’s “3 Peerless Republicans for President: Trump, Carson and Fiorina”, deems the leading candidates from the Grand Old Party unfit for presidency, and the public’s fixation with them a temporary affair. Multiple previous controversies being detailed, and the use notably bleak statistics help undermine the contenders while urging voters to look elsewhere. Kristof utilizes harsh diction with a simple, yet critical tone to denounce the trio, and further his own
In the article, “The Bernie Bomb”, the tones of abhorrence and antagonism shows affirmation in most of the article. The author’s, Kimberley Strassel, message she is conveying is that Bernie Sanders is not an acceptable President, not only that, but, the Strassel insults Sanders by saying that whoever donated to him should ask for a refund. The diction used relates to the tone of the passage, how Strassel phrases it is able to convey a very negative tone. For instance, Strassel calls Sanders a “lazy debater” who “happens to be stunningly unprepared” for the debate and how he “stumbled through all this with incoherent meditations.”
Frank Rich maintains a critical tone throughout the entire article. His use of short sentences such as “Actually, no. People don’t change” and the word “minions” to describe Hilary Clinton in the first section shows his discontent with the candidate. Rich continues his critical tone as he discusses the other candidates. The use of words such as “bigoted”, “cowering”, and “off-the-wall” show that Rich is angry at the majority of the candidates.
” This is an effective device because it makes the reader pay more attention to the opponent’s personal affiliations rather than their argument by not allowing the audience to assess the opponent’s argument for its validity, but it also discredits her claim. By using this device Gail Collins is drawing attention to President Trump’s and Roy Moore’s rather unpleasant and repulsive behavior to deceive the reader and make them believe that
America was molded by a group of individuals who felt that their voice was being drowned out by a tyrannical monarchy. After the revolution, this was resolved by creating a system that attempted to allow all people to have a say in the country’s government. The Electoral College was established as a representative way for the citizens of America to elect a leader; however, many are not satisfied with the results.
On September 5,1995, many individuals gathered around to listen to, then, First Lady, Hillary Clinton. Her speech was the United Nations Fourth National Conference of Women and was given in Beijing China. This conference was held to help reach greater equal opportunity for woman around the world. The speech was solely based on women’s rights and targeted the audience to peruse the goal of making women rights human rights. Hillary Clinton addressed problems that many other countries faced regarding the liberties of women and she also insisted on why it was important for women to be granted human rights.
On September 26,2016 the first presidential debate commences between Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. One of the topics that was extensively debated on was the Criminal Justice system and the issue of systemic racism in this country. Donald Trump took the stance of Law and Order in order to solve the issue that are prevalent in our society today. In contrast, Hillary Clinton approach was one of Criminal Justice Reform. By analyzing the candidate’s responses in relation to outside reliable sources we can the verify which running mate is truthful.
When I was a child, I always had to read paragraphs multiple times because I struggled with reading. This caused me to spend more time on reading than other children reading the same material. I thought I was stupid. Then one morning, my mother told me that I had dyslexia. Dyslexia causes reading and writing to require more energy and time.
Unbroken is a biography by Laura Hillenbrand about Louie Zamperini’s entire life. Louie Zamperini is a son of Italian Immigrants that moved to Torrance, California. He starts out as a problem child that would steal, drink and smoke, but he eventually straightens out through sports and became an Olympian later in life. After he went to the Olympics, he gets drafted into World War 2.
The negative attacks that were widely publicized in the election of 2016 have various similarities to those that occurred in the election of 1800. In both political landscapes, there were two distinct parties with opposing views of how the United States’ government should be run, and each tried to persuade voters by attacking the morals and political views of the opposing party and its candidates. The two opposing parties in the election of 1800 were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. John Adams, the incumbent president and former vice-president to George Washington, was the head of the Federalist ticket, and Thomas Jefferson, the sitting vice-president and the former Secretary of State to George Washington, was the head of the Democratic-Republican ticket. Over the course of the 1800 election, the main accusations thrown were of the opposition being monarchist, elitist, “Jacobin”, and godless.
Fallacies in political speeches: Donald Trump announces he is running for president. Donald Trump’s one very distinct “ability” is making a vast amount of people react to what he says. Be it good or bad, this makes him gain more attention not only in the United States, but all over the world. At the end of the day, what really matters is if his statements have, in fact, any effect on people’s votes. So for those who are not yet sure about his sincerity, it only takes a not to deep analysis of his speeches to spot serious fallacies.
Our educational system is failing us. The United States of America is supposed to be the “greatest” country in the world but statistics are showing that our government/educational system is failing us; children/young adults of the nation. Being a student of a middle ranked school in Arizona, I personally have had a first-hand feel for how good and/or bad teaching affects students. Just in high school I have had teachers that would just assign websites as our lesson and even teachers that sit at their desk for the whole hour; don’t even go over the mindset, homework, and maybe only show one problem so that we’ll know what the homework will be like. Until sophomore year I didn’t even know the differences between you’re, your, too, and to.
Monetary and Societal Obstacles Societal simply comes from the word society and it means relating to society. Monetary refers to money. In our society monetary and societal obstacles can intertwine. These obstacles can even build on each other. Consequently, this can cause bigger problems if they are not handled correctly.
Introduction and Outline This essay’s purpose is to highlight how school curriculum is altered in order to include a student with additional learning needs. Every student is unique and for that reason a teacher must differentiate the curriculum to suit the needs of student with a specific learning difficulty. Dyslexia is the learning difficulty which will be examined theoretically and methodically in this essay. This essay will examine the different learning theories of how to engage a child with dyslexia in the classroom.
So making a bad decision is never fun. I’d like to think that most of us prefer not to make them but can’t help to sometimes because we think a bad decision isn’t that bad. It might even be a good one in the right mind set. The point of this paper being to reflect on a pass choice looking at it with the elements of critical thinking. My bad decision is one I think most are guilty of, waiting until the last minute on something important.