Fees are good for school sports because the money that parents pay for their child to play a sport goes towards equipment for that sport. In the text, it said “ A lack of money has forced some schools to charge students and parents for courses and books. Free books and classes are more important than free sports programs. Schools should charge students for sports before they make them pay for books and classes. After all, education should come first at schools. Schools don 't want to charge for sports, but many have to. " This shows that the schools spend more money on our school supplies so that we can learn but when it comes time to get sports equipment it 's time for parents to help. In the text, it said “ Gary Frisch, a school …show more content…
Year round schooling has many benefits.In the text it states “Frequent breaks are good for students. They have less stress when they go back to school after a short break. They become more eager to learn”.this shows that when kids go back to school after a short break they are more excited about learning. In the text it states “ One student said, "I love it. Just about the time I 'm really tired, I get a break." This is showing even when kids want to go on break they are excited to come back to school even though their brake may be shorter. In the text it states “Breaks also give teachers time to plan better lessons. Teachers in schools with a long summer break are so busy teaching that they have less time to plan lessons for their classes. Students in year-round schools tend to remember what they learn. That is because their breaks aren 't too long.” This shows that with shorter breaks children don 't forget what they have learned and teachers have more time to plan better lessons. So even though kids and teachers may not have long breaks they learn more and when kids come back from summer break teachers don’t have to teach previously learned …show more content…
Yes the should students pay to play text has the answer to the original question asked because in the text it said “More and more schools are charging for activities and supplies. Many schools now charge a pay-to-play fee. A pay-to-play fee bills parents for their children 's after-school sports activities. The fee helps to pay for equipment and coaching. It also pays for bus rides to and from games”.This is saying that students should pay to play because the money they are using is going to the sports team’s equipment and the team’s coaches and the team 's transportation. In the text it said “A lack of money has forced some schools to charge students and parents for courses and books. Free books and classes are more important than free sports programs. Schools should charge students for sports before they make them pay for books and classes. After all, education should come first at schools. Schools don 't want to charge for sports, but many have to. "Where else are you going to turn?" asked Gary Frisch, a school official”. This saying that even though having books and courses should be free and parents should not have to pay for that but because parents are not paying for their children to play sports the school is making them pay for books and courses instead. In the text it said “Fees are good for school sports. They weed out players who aren 't serious about a sport. That makes teams stronger. Fees also make students put a higher value on playing”. This is
Colleges have to pay for things like the fields/facilities, scholarships, coaches, equipment, etc. The author said that athletics in 1893 were discouraging the ordinary person for attending a college, but today it is the total opposite. Many college students are huge sports fans and will pick a college with a good athletic program, because they believe it brings the campus closer together. Many people today still believe that there is corruption in college football, but overall it is a sport that has brought many Americans
Parents think that the more money they put into the child’s athletic expenses, they increase their chances of college scholarships and leading to a professional athletic career. An exceedingly amount of money can be spent on athletics because parents want to be able to provide every opportunity they can for their child to become better and to be successful. For example, at Jim-McLean Junior Golf Performance Academy, there are only twenty-four spots open each year for distinct private instruction. With limited entry comes at a cost of $39,875 to $58,875 annually. A noticeable agglomeration of money comes out of the family’s gross income to fund their child’s athletics.
Michael P. Auerbach, a journalist that argues that school fees should not effect if you can play in sports or other school activities state's, “School administrators have begun charging fees for classroom supplies,school athletic programs,academic clubs, and other activities.” Which if you do not pay you do not get to participate. gTo me that is unfair. A kid that wants to be involved in a sport but cant just because of money. Michael P. Auerbach,a journalist that notices that, “In light of these current trends, most school districts in the united states have been forced to implement budgets that cut programs, reduce staff, and also close schools.”
(Zimbalist) No one is making the students play a specific sport, they chose to because they enjoy the activity. If the NCAA chose to change their rules and decide to pay athletes, the next question is, is it
The fact that many schools with year round school are showing better scores and more improvement from the student. Schools have year round school. To began, Year round school have many different scheduling for the kids. With year round school kids getting longer time off on breaks.
On top of a scholarship, student athletes are also provided with many free things such as game tickets, apparel and equipment. Although scholarships take off a lot of the cost to go to college, they aren’t enough on their own. Most scholarships are not full ride and students are left to pay some school fines. Student athletes need an income to help pay the extra money they owe that the scholarship doesn’t pay for, and also so that they have some money when they come out of college. Paying college athletes is a way to encourage students to play sports.
They welcome breaks to reflect on what they have covered, speak to one another, and plan the next lesson plan. Results of some studies even show that in general, year round schoolteachers have a better attendance record than those teaching in traditional schools. Short breaks known as intermissions boost their self-esteem, ambition while reducing stress or anxiety (Kneese). Many teachers have the option of teaching or substitute teaching intersession courses preventing them from having to find a second job (Kneese). This is a plus for the teacher, meaning they have opportunities to work year round securing an income the entire year.
Not having the traditional three month break will eventually help people’s lives in the long run. These are some great reasons why people should think about why school and life would be easier if they didn’t have the traditional three month break of instead of
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
"Pay to Play" Participating on a sports team is an extremely important event for many high schoolers across America. Sports have almost become a lifestyle for many students across the country. Unfortunately the United States economy remains in a substandard position and cannot afford to give schools enough funding to cover all athletics. With this problem at hand, many schools have had to start requiring a "pay to play" policy in which the student athlete pays the school a certain amount in order to play for the team.
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
Horace Michell in his article, “Students Are Not Professional Athletes,” and Dave Zirin in her article, “An Economist Explains Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.",” offers differing views on why student athletes should and or shouldn’t be paid. Horace States that College Athletes are not proficient competitors who are paid pay rates and motivating forces for a profession in games. They are students getting access to a school instruction through their cooperation in games, for which they procure grants to pay educational cost, charges, food and lodging, and other permissible costs. University games are not a vocation or calling. It is the understudies' vehicle to an advanced education degree.
" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.
Since at least the 1970’s, the topic of year-round schooling has been debated by many people. This new system is spreading across the nation fast, in fact, in 2011-12, there were about 3700 schools that operated on the year-round schedule. (Zubrzycki 1,3). Like any other controversial topic, there are both benefits and drawbacks to the year-round schooling system. For instance, a definite benefit would be that, “...with one group of students always on vacation, a school that was built for 750 students can serve as many as 1000.
´´ School sport are not that expensive but the cost of club sports is outrageous for kids. The text ´´ Should Your School get rid of Sports ´´ wrote ´´