Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals. If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid …show more content…
Another reason that it would be bad for college athletes to be paid is because the colleges would build a bad reputation for being all about the money and not about education. Already, some colleges are accused of using money to influence players into going to their school. "If a high-school football prodigy reported that he chose Michigan not for its academic quality, tradition, or beautiful campus but because it outbid all other suitors, a connection to the university’s values would be lost." (Yankah). Ever since the first college institutions were founded, they were either known for their academics or athletics. There is a distinct line between the two, and all you have to look at are the sports facilities on the campus. If a student athlete that only want d to go to college for athletics had the choice to go to North Carolina or Harvard, he would most likely choose North Carolina. What if the same situation was used, but this particular athlete could be paid by any college? If he was going to college to play sports and Harvard offered him more money than North Carolina, then the athlete would be more likely to choose Harvard. This just shows how corrupt college sports could get if the athletes were paid. Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting
First of all, if these college football players were paid, it might keep more of them in school. In Craig Keolanui’s article he mentions “Getting paid to play in college can make it easier to stay in school when a player’s draft stock can be improved, experience at the collegiate level enhanced and education on and off the field furthered.” (Keolanui, Craig Page 1 The Sportster). If College football players were getting paid to play, more would stay in school because it 's like a job and they are earning a paycheck to support themselves.
2019, www.theperspective.com/debates/sports/college-athletes-get-paid/. Summary: In the bottom section of this article, the author delves into a couple specific reasons why college athletes do not need or deserve compensation. Piccioto talks more about the harm that compensation for college athletes does to them, rather than the harm done to the universities. Piccioto suggests that paying college athletes takes away from what college actually is and he argues that the athletes should be treated as normal students, since they really are.
These athletes should get paid as if it is their job since they devote the same amount of time towards it as they would a job. The fact that scholarships do not cover all expenses for every athlete is one reason why college athletes should get
Should College Football Players be Paid This question is a very controversial question in today's day and age. I personally believe that college players should not get payed. College is a privilege for most athletes and it's not required they stay there. I think that college should be looked up as educational first and sports second.
If the players or team aren’t very talented then tickets won’t sell, jerseys won’t sell and college won’t be supported, therefore making less money. However, if the team is very exceptional then the opposite occurs the college receives a glorious payday every weekend. Many others agree that college players should be paid as well. In a survey conducted at Hillsborough Middle School, in Pod 7/8c, 14 out of 20 students believe that college athletes should be paid. The other 30% of students believe that college athletes shouldn’t be paid only because of their age, only being in highschool and because they haven’t made it big.
In order for the NCAA to stay competitive, student athletes should not get paid to play. Some believe paying college athletes for being involved in a sport is fair and deserve pay for
Should College Football Players Get Paid? If professional players get paid to play, should college players get paid as well? Should college football players get paid? It’s the students choice if they play sports or not, many colleges could afford to pay the players, but others wouldn't have the funds, also the NCAA and it’s member institutions wouldn't have the funds to pay every player.
The reasons college athletes should be paid is because although they have their scholarship; it typically does not pay for everything. Secondly other people make money off of the college athletes. And lastly college athletes do not have the time to get a decent job, or even a job at all. The NCAA does not allow athletes to be paid which
College athletes staying pure to the game College athletes should not be paid to play, they should not be paid to play because it is something that they have to work for and in a way it would replace scholarships. College athletes already receive scholarships and they are meant to help them with their schooling and education, not to play sports. College athletes are also students and most of them will already receive scholarship from the college. The scholarship alone should be plenty of enough money for a student, to be paid more on top of that would just be ridiculous and unreasonable. For many young athlete, going to college to play the game you love is a once and a lifetime opportunity and privilege.
After dissecting the dilemma of payment for college athletes, one may discover that oftentimes the only incentive college athletes receive is a full athletic scholarship to the college/university, as opposed to a salary. There must be a reason as to why the college athletes do not receive a salary even though they generate billions of dollars for the NCAA. There are numerous sources illustrating pros and cons regarding whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Some argue that athletes should be paid because they are forced to endure unhealthy environments and unfair treatment, struggle through the “plantation system”, want support for themselves, etc. Opposers of this argument state that athletes should not be paid because of financial irresponsibility, education equaling money, university offering more than education, loss of passion for the game, etc.
Argument: ‘It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.’ from Anderson. So why should college athletes be paid, since they are based on their reputation. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. For example before you go to college you will get scouted from the university during high school.
As we all know the struggle to stay above water financially for college students is very real. While attending college full time it is difficult enough to maintain a job as it is. When you add the factor of being an athlete to this equation it makes this struggle of having a job ten times more difficult. This is because being an athlete is like having a full time job, it consumes a lot of time and leaves no time to get a paying job. This is why I pose the argument that all college athletes should get paid.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
Another question asked is what effect would being paid have on the athletes? Would athletes become lazy? Would it set them up poorly for the next part of their lives when they will have to work in order to pay bills and support a family? This is the main argument for those who oppose paying college athletes. They claim that if athletes were to start getting paid as a college athlete there is no reason for them to work as hard to become professional athletes or successful in their chosen profession after their playing career.
College athletes are being paid scholarships but do scholarships pay for rent, loans, or food etc. Paying college athletes detracts the purity of the game. Most football players are not in it for the money but for the love of the sport and the chance to say that they had the chance to play college football at that university. College football is a privilege to play it is also a lot of people's jobs that are on the line that they work at year around threw breaks assignments and