Chapter One: Ideas that Shape American Politics 1. There are three forms of equality (social, political, and economic), define each. Which is most important in our modern democracy? Social equality refers to all individuals enjoying the same status in the society. Political equality means all citizens having the same political rights and opportunities. Similarly, economic equality is the situation where there is minimum difference between the wealth of rich and poor citizens. All three equalities are mutually dependent with each other. So, all are equally important in our modern democracy. 2. What is the difference between a democracy and a republic? Explain what the U.S. is. Democracy means that citizens can directly participate on making the government decisions whereas republic in …show more content…
In some colonies, it was followed by other rights freedom of speech and press. Citizens right would be the issue in debate to accept the new constitution. 2. What are the five overarching ideas introduced by the Declaration of Independence? Are we close to achieving any of these aspirations today? The five overarching ideas introduced by the Declaration of Independence are: a) All people are equal b) They are endowed with rights that cannot be taken away. c) These rights include life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. d) People from governments to protect those rights. e) Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. Yes, we are close to achieving these aspirations today. 3. What is the difference between a federalist and an anti-federalist? Who were some famous examples? The federalists support the Constitution as presented by the convention delegates where as anti-federalists opposed the constitution and claimed that it gave the national government too much power, which erode states authority and endangered individual
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Why did the framers of the United States Constitution, ultimately deciding to give more power to the federal government rather than the state's government? Why did the framers of the Constitution decide to give more power to the federal government then the state government? The framers who created the United States Constitution chose the idea of Federalism because they wanted a government that was able to unify a belief within the states without diminishing each state's' ability to control itself. And in doing that they made it so the in state powers had of course a lesser impact than the federal powers. I think they did this because they were very distrusting of the government operations and the way that governments worked to take away
Articles of Confederation America was suffering from its debts and had trouble competing economically. The articles of confederation already limited what the Congress could do. Most of the powers were given to the states and limited what the Congress was able to do. Each state had its own goal and policies on imports and exports that made each state very different making it more difficult to regulate trade. The only place that the Congress could regulate trade was the natives, and when the Congress wants to trade with foreign countries they can’t because Congress didn’t have any negotiation trade agreements due to the limitation of the articles of confederation.
The differences between the federalists and the anti-federalists is the federalists like a central government while the anti-federalists like a small weak government. The constitutional convention was held and the federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation while the anti-federalists
The American Revolution was a great and eventful time in American history. The colonists were tired of being under the harsh rule of the British king. Americans soon realized they were being taken advantage of by being subjected to unfair taxes and acts of violence by British soldiers. This was simply not the dignity and fair treatment Americans believed every human being was entitled to. High tensions between the Americans and the British led the colonists to declare war.
Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.
The Declaration of Independence was a list of grievances against the King and also an explanation to other nations why the colonies had separated from Britain. The Declaration was written based on certain truths and remember to keep certain beliefs in mind. All men are meant to be equal and to have certain, “unalienable” rights that the government can never take away. These rights include "life, liberty and the pursuit of
When it came to the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists the differences are many and at times very complex, due to the beliefs that the Federalists are nationalist at heart. The Federalists had an incredibly big role in shaping the new Constitution, which the Federalists used to create a stronger Constitution at great cost to the Anti-Federalists. If you ask the Anti-Federalists They believe that should be a ratification of the US Constitution in every state. But due to the Anti-Federalists being poor at organizing they really didn’t gain any ground. Although they didn’t achieve their goals of ratification of the US Constitution, but they did force the first congress under a new Constitution along with the bill of rights.
On September 17, 1787 the Constitution was written. This event is also known as the Constitutional Convention. The Anti-Federalists and the Federalists, had different views on the Constitution, the Federalists had wanted the Constitution to be ratified with limited power of the government. Where as the Anti-Federalists had not wanted the Constitution to be ratified and wanted a compromise for this problem. For this conflict to have a compromise this is where the Bill of Rights came in.
The document included four ideals in the order that follows: equality, unalienable rights, consent of the governed, and the right to alter or abolish government. The Ideals reason how men should be treated and the freedoms that every individual has. Although all of the ideals in the Declaration of Independence are
Anti-Federalists wanted the complete opposite of the Federalists. Anti-Federalists were for power of the states and not the government. They believed in the Articles of Confederation that the Constitution wouldn’t defend individual rights. Anti-Federalists such as John Hancock, Patrick Henry and George Mason argued that the Constitution did not include the Bill of Rights and the government had way too much
Federalist V. Anti-Federalist Federalist and Anti-Federalist were two factions most commonly known for debating during the transition from the Articles of Confederation of the United States Constitution. Both sides debated many things, including the liberties of a citizen in the United States. I believe that the Anti-Federalist 's ideals best preserved the liberties of Americans. The Anti-Federalists believed that there were three defects of a large republic. First, only a small republic can enjoy a voluntary attachment of the people to the government and a voluntary obedience to the laws (Storing, 16).
Federalists shared the belief that the Constitution would bring a good balance of power. While the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry, were the exact opposite; they were against the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists were concerned about their liberty and the government being given too much power.
The Declaration of Independence consisted of an introduction, a long list of grievances against the British and a Declaration of Independence from Great Britain. The Declaration has four main ideals for what is needed in a country. The Ideals are equality, right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, consent of the Governed and the right to alter or abolish the government. The most important ideal is equality.
Federalist and Anti-Federalist had different views on the new constitution. The Federalist supported strong central government and did not want the Bill of Rights. Anti-Federalist wanted power in the states and wanted limited federal power. The framers chose to create a strong federal government because they wanted a government that could bring together a belief within the states without reducing other states ability to control itself. They wanted small states because it would make is easier to reach an agreement.
The federalist want a New Constitution because Federalist want a fresh start and want to avoid tyranny. In my opinion the Anti-Federalist is the weaker government between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Anti-Federalist do not want states to have their own government. Not having a government in charge of each individual state