The Federalist Papers consisted of eighty-five letters written to different newspapers in the last 1780’s, urging ratification of the United States Constitution. The Constitution needed approval from nine out of the thirteen original states. I agree with the Federalists concerning the issue of whether or not the Constitution should have been ratified as written. I have this viewpoint for many reasons. One is because I agree with the points Madison stated in the 10th Federalist paper where he discusses the fact that the Constitution makes the government capable of controlling damage and violence caused by factions, or political parties. My first point comes from the 10th Federalist paper written by James Madison. As stated earlier, in this essay he talks about how a well-constructed union could break and control the violence of different factions. Madison says, “Those who hold, and those who are without property, have ever formed distinct interests in society.” This is true in many ways. The proposed Constitution made sure that there was no way that one “faction” or political …show more content…
This one was also written by James Madison. In this essay, he talks about how to structure of the proposed government makes liberty possible. He argues that every branch of said proposed government should be mostly independent. I agree with this because I believe that the branches should be mostly independent and should have almost the same amount of power divided between them. Madison also talks about how that governments can thrive by not having too many groups but having just enough with almost the same amount of power, making justice obtainable. If there are too many self made groups and too many people trying to have power in a government, it’s hard for everyday people to be able to liberty and justice. Madison said that the preservation of state governments could help everyone achieve both liberty and union and I agree with
Without a large republic not only are you going to have the tyranny of the majority, but you are not going to have a unified country. If we become factionalized to the point where every person represents their own views we are going to be headed towards civil war quickly, and we are going to break up as a nation. By having a large republic and by having all of these voices silenced in their factions we can stay coherent. Madison comes to the conclusion we are not going to have a large enough faction to tear the nation apart, but he is wrong because different opinions will always exist as long as people are free and self-love exist. These factions are inevitably going to tear the nation apart.
James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.
Federalist Paper 10 & 51 Jyla Miller Coach Hill (Ph.d) AP Government September 22, 2014 Discuss Federalist Paper The federalist papers are a combination of 85 essays written to urge the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. They were written and released in the 1870s to all 13 states. In order for the constitution to be ratified nine out of thirteen had to be approved. These papers were weighed under the pseudonym “Publius”.
In the Federalist no. 10 James Madison argues that the iniquity of the government by the people is its exposure to the issue caused by factions. Madison defines factions as any group of people that share the same views and opinions. These factions often assemble together causing violence and damage to secure personal economic investments and enforce their political views. Madison’s main concern with factions is that one might reduce the rights of another or effect the good of the whole in order to protect their own self-interest. When given the freedom to do so, these personal interest are usually at the price of another group.
James Madison, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, wrote his essay “Federalist No. 10” with the inspiration of the ratification of The Constitution. He starts off by mentioning that one of the most important capabilities of a well-constructed Union is breaking and controlling the violence of faction. Madison adequately defined factions, their causes, and ways to eliminate factions. He also clearly mentioned the role of The Constitution in regulating the effects of factions.
In the article “The Federalist No. 10” James Madison a faction is a group of citizens made up of people with the same interests and who don’t seem to care about the rights of other citizens. A lot of people weren’t agreeing when it was said that the United States would be too big to govern as a democracy causing there to be a large amount of factions. James Madison was aware there were a variety of factions, he showed that the democratic side using the majority rule would take down the factions resulting in making them come together to work as one, the republican side would allow the factions the necessary space for them to work together and get elected in the office. The minority groups would be protected because it would indicate the factions
Madison explained how there is “no cure for the mischiefs of faction”, and gives other viable options to limit them such as having a strong union. This paper most certainly fits in with a larger series as they all try to accomplish the same thing. The papers all promote the ratification of the constitution, this is accomplished by explaining certain ideals and promises within the constitution. The basic argument of this paper is that factions which are inevitable, will lead to “unequal faculties of acquiring property”.
James Madison is also trying to say that at this point all we need is a strong lasting union. This quote supports my big idea because the citizens don’t want secrets or lies if they are a union they need to know what is happening. The union is a whole,
51, Madison states, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” Madison made it clear that we, as humans, can have natural qualities engraved in our personalities such as greediness, corruptive behavior, and ambitiousness, and that the government we create should be one that will not be torn down by such qualities, but be able to cooperate with them. In addition, Madison believed that a republic, in general, can oftentimes lead people into taking advantage of political powers, making it a difficult form of government to control—he states, “…in framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty is this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control
Outline on Federalist No. 10 • The instability, injustice and confusion in public council are the mortal diseases in popular governments. • James Madison tells us that valuable improvement made by constitution on the popular models for both ancient and modern cannot certainly admired, but they have effectually obviated the danger. • Madison gave the explanation about complaints heard from citizens on unstable government and measures decided by superior force of interest or major parties, but not by justice and rights of minor parties. • Factions are group of people who are against the government and get united for common impulse and adverse to the rights of other citizens or permanent and aggregated interests of the community. • Madison tells
10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.
The idea behind the separation of the federal and the state governments is once again to protect, and ensure, the liberty of the masses. By having two different governments, they can control each other, but also regulate themselves (executive, legislative, and judiciary branches). As for the protection of the minority, when the majority has an issue in common, then the rights of the minority become irrelevant. In the essay, Madison proposed two methods to avoid such tyranny. His first proposition was to create a “will” independent of society.
James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.
Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.
As he explains in the paper, people are not perfect, so a government is needed. A government would not be necessary if people were perfect, but due to imperfection of people, control is needed inside and out of the government. Madison suggests that a separation of powers within the government is to keep watch on the other departments, and while this is occurring, no department has an equal amount of self-defense. Each department will have its own set of actions and will be appointed by different methods of election. Madison held that independent departments can seldom have connection to each other, while they do have a connection to the