Juror number 3 went off knowing that they’ll spend some time in the room debating whether the boy was the murderer of his father, along with the other jurors. The way juror number three was displaying in a way was that he was judging the boy since he was in the courtroom and mentioned he looked as guilty as ever, but this preconceived notion goes more into depth with the same juror commenting about his background. When someone has the mind of bias thinking, that person is entitled to only see the flaws of others and not the positive qualities one possess, yet can’t see their own mistakes committed noticed. As this continues, juror eight viewed this case and led some other jurors to think and dramatize the evidence they were given by the testimonies from what they saw. Little by little, the jurors start to change their opinion about the case of the young man and have been supporting juror eight by the facts he has stated in the room, yet juror three still wouldn’t reason correctly and thought the guy should convicted of the
The young boy of 19 killing his father was a big enough dilemma its self, but it wouldn 't of be enough to make the story positively interesting. Jury 3 was constantly arrogant towards jury 8. He was always telling the others, that jury 8 was lying, and trying to trick them. Jury 3 was essential in the plot, and the buzz of the story. He was constantly fighting back for his own problems with his son.
All of the evidence in the murder of Hae Min Lee has many twists and turns causing a great diabolical about who is truly guilty. Jay Wilders played his case well enough that he was not put in prison, but Adnan couldn’t say the same. Adnan must have been one unlucky of a person. It does seem in some parts of the case Adnan did some pretty strange things. Jay’s constant changing of his story should have been taken into consideration a little more though.
In the book Bad Boy Brawly Brown, one of the main characters names is Easy. Easy is someone who’s in his late twenty’s he lives a tough lifestyle which has made him even more powerful. This character has seen a lot throughout his childhood which is why he became a street boy making the wrong decisions hanging around the wrong crowd of people because that’s all he ever saw growing up in the streets with his older friends until things went left for Easy. The world views Easy as a powerful person but yet he’s known to be dangerous Easy stated that his reason for being a dangerous person is because you never know who’s out to get you this character has developed a reputation that has let people know that if you mess with him or the people who Easy calls his family you will regret it and because of that everyone that’s from the same town as Easy knows that Easy is not someone to play with if you cross the line with Easy it will cost you in the long run. When I first read Bad Boy Brawly Brown during school I identified with the character Easy because he is someone with a big heart just as much as I have a big heart Easy has learned that sometimes having a big heart can
As a result, these intolerable racial profiling and skin color degradation, is emotionally and mentally damaging to any individual’s especially to the men of color. The racial profiling that narrowed the lives of African-American to live a normal life because of the society’s faulty criminal intuition beliefs. Staples expresses about his inaccurate identity given by the society as a con man. Whether trying to enjoy for a walk or killing time as a professional journalist many times, an incident happened that the society have made Staples feeling uncomfortable. Staples express the many events in his life mistaken as a criminal for being black, especially the women that come across his way.
The reality he and the other prisoners had their backs turned to. The escaped prisoner realized his life was a lie and that the shadows and the voices he thought were coming from them were a great big lie. Through this Plato teaches the reader that perception is not always reality especially when that perception isn’t their own discovery rather another's forced ideas. In relation to today, the stereotypes of race, culture, and gender in the American media have played the role of the shadows that cause discrimination and judgement towards to innocent people. Gun violence and mass shooting terrorist attacks have
Juror are randomly chosen citizens brought in to watch and interpret the case, and break it down and decide whether the defendant is guilty or not. Reginald Rose´s 12 Angry Men was written after while watching real murder trial it inspired him to reveal the positives and negatives of Jury deliberations. While bench trial have strong merits, trial by Jury is more effective for many reasons including,the diversity and variety of backgrounds the jurors bring, the increase chance of discovering the truth, as well as, the fact that Jurors are usually more caring then a Judge who may be calloused from previous experiences is why trial by Jury is the fairest way to decide a criminal case. A significant advantage trial by jury offer is the diversity and variety in backgrounds the Jurors. While the Jurors were discussing the stab wound Juror Five presents the relevant the point with his jurors saying, ¨ You don 't hold this of knife that way.
Though juror 3 has been adamant on the guilt of the young boy it is safe to say that this case meant more to him because the relationship with his son is similar to the relationship between the boy and the father. Since his personal vendetta causes him to forcefully accuse the boy of murder it leaves the jury 11-1 in favor of not guilty. Since carefully reviewing the movie it becomes very prevalent that there has not been enough substantial evidence to convict the boy of murder. Furthermore, with the usage of group think all of the men, accept juror 3 are able to put their pride aside and vote what they truly believe the verdict should be, which is not guilty. Though, one of the more pragmatic points in the film happens after juror 3 becomes infuriated after realizing that all of the men are voting not guilty.
Rose suggests that one’s personal life should not influence their professional life as this hinders one from using reason and logic to take just decisions. Juror 3’s experience with his son results into him believing that all children from the slums are “real trash” which implies that he has implanted this mental belief in his mind that all children from the slums are ill-mannered. Along with this, he generalises all children by referring to them as “angry” and
It’s not so easy for me to send a boy off to die without talking about it first.”(12 Angry Men) In the first difference, Juror 7 falls with Juror 3, believing much more of the facts than discussion. The second difference with the approach of the two jurors is in their persuasions techniques. As for Juror 3, he prefers loud, yelling, and calling people out and telling them they are wrong. This is why Juror 3 is represented with a lightning bolt. On the outside, he is obviously quick striking, hot, and loud.