ipl-logo

2. What Is The Sudan Doing To Support Or Condemn This Issue?

428 Words2 Pages

Does the Republic of the Sudan support or condemn this issue?
The Republic of the Sudan strongly supports the stemming of the proliferation of nuclear weapons, not only in Asia but in the whole world. Sudan envisions for a world devoid of nuclear weapons and strives to achieve this goal.
2) What is the Republic of the Sudan doing to support or condemn this issue?
The Republic of the Sudan does not have any present projects for nuclear weapons in order to prevent the increasing spread of nuclear weapons; but it has not taken any direct action to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Asia, in particular.
It has ratified and signed treaties to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons in the world, as a whole. These include:
a) The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty …show more content…

c) Sudan has signed and ratified the African Nuclear Weapon-Free- Zone Treaty
(Pelindaba Treaty) in the July of 1964, in its quest to rid the world of nuclear weapons. 3) What is the Republic of the Sudan planning to do in the future to support or condemn this issue?
The Republic of the Sudan pledges to abide by the laws of all the treaties that it has signed and ratified. It will also support and abide by any new ways of fighting the growing threat of nuclear weapons. It will continue to propagate and reveal the threat that nuclear weapons are.

4) What can be done to stem the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Asian states?
There are a few methods for this and some that can be followed in the current circumstances are outlined below:

a) States can be showed reason, of what they can achieve if they put their income in something other than nuclear weapons.
b) If these methods do not work, international pressure has to be exerted on the un-cooperating state. This will result in bitter international

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Leadership And Economic Policies Of Presidents Reagan And Franklin Roosevelt

    1118 Words  | 5 Pages

    The treaty was signed by Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev. It was to eliminate and control the use of nuclear weapons that could fire long distances. All launchers that had a range of 500-5500 kilometers were to be destroyed. This was effective, but it also came to an end. It got rid of nearly 2,700 missiles.

    Read More

  • Summary Of From The Grass Roots To The Summit

    1481 Words  | 6 Pages

    The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

    Read More

  • Cold War Dbq

    1298 Words  | 6 Pages

    Also the way that President John F. Kennedy was able to make a treaty, Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty on July 25, 1963. between the U.S and USSR to make sure both sides aren’t testing nuclear weapons in open air or in the

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Atoms For Peace

    887 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

    Read More

  • Should The United States Abolish Nuclear Weapons Dbq Essay

    688 Words  | 3 Pages

    The abolition of nuclear weapons wouldn't really be progress if all other countries still have them Therefore, why should the United States get rid of them. Document D

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons Schlosser

    302 Words  | 2 Pages

    Schlosser asserts that Iran shouldn’t be able to possess nuclear weapons due to the pervasive threat it will pose. He acknowledges that nuclear weapons haven’t been used since the World War II, which suggests that a nuclear war will never happen. In addition, Schlosser emphasizes the ubiquity of the belief that nuclear weapons serve as war deterrents between nuclear powers by quoting Kenneth Waltz. Schlosser agrees that the belief does describe recent situations but doesn’t portray the future.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Deterrence Between The United States And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

    262 Words  | 2 Pages

    The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

    Read More

  • Why Did Iran Build A Nuclear Energy For Civilian Use Underground?

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    On December 8, 1953, President Eisenhower had a meeting with the United Nations General Assembly where he delivered his “Atoms for Peace” speech. This speech started the world on studying nuclear energy. According to an article by Ariana Rowberry, President Eisenhower said in his speech “…if a danger exists in the world, it is a danger shared by all; and equally, that if hope exists in the mind of one nation, that hope should be shared by all” (1). The Atoms for Peace provided technology and education for countries wanting a civilian nuclear program. What has led Iran from the ability to poses nuclear energy for civilian use to wanting to acquire an atomic

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On North Korea

    439 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mankind has only witnessed the atomic power of nuclear weapons twice in human history. Since the final events of World War Two, nuclear weapons have been extensively developed and are currently orders of magnitude more powerful than Fat Man and Little Boy. Currently, the nuclear power is distributed among nine nations in the world. A solution to the nuclear is in high demand as North Korea continues to push the limits of nuclear testing. I think that the decisions made and events during the next five years are going to set precedent on the controversial subject.

    Read More

  • Humorous Wedding Speech Essay

    671 Words  | 3 Pages

    The U.S. has the help of advanced technology to produce countless amount of nuclear weapons, and just with that it is one threat to consider. We must understand that this matters to people everywhere. One nuclear weapon explosion will cause a chain reaction no matter where it happens, and there will be no end to what the consequences may be. None of the challenges put on us can solved quickly or easily. But we can start by listening to one another and work together, so that we may focus on our common interests, rather than our differences; and that we bring forward our shared values.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay

    1269 Words  | 6 Pages

    The continuous need for the United States to have nuclear weapons is evident especially in today's society for a number of different reasons that include deterring war between the U.S. and other

    Read More

  • North Korea Research Paper

    559 Words  | 3 Pages

    I must convince China that their desired outcome for N. Korea, stability, cannot be achieved until the nuclear threat from North Korea is completely removed. It is imperative that they begin to understand that they must take on a more active role. The isolation and sanction tactics we’ve imposed has made N Korea more reliant upon China as its primary source of food, fuel, investment, and international political support. The turmoil surrounding N. Korea’s nuclear possession directly affects China’s security. Regrettably, China is doing very little to move the denuclearization effort forward.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation

    1032 Words  | 5 Pages

    Consequently, these beliefs could lead to a preliminary conclusion that the world will turn into anarchy system. According to the study presented by Ahmed (2007), this could be obvious by tracing back the early beginnings of global nuclear war development to the nuclear programs that started by the Soviet Union in response to the achievements made by the United States in the development of nuclear technology. Subsequently, other states such as France and the UK launched similar nuclear projects as a deterrent to potential invasion from the Soviet Union. Other states such as China, Israel, India, and Pakistan have launched nuclear weapon development programs majorly citing the need to protect their international borders and their interests in the region are the main reason for their involvement with the development of nuclear weapons (Rooth, 2015; Ahmed, 2007). Thus, it can be stated from the

    Read More

  • China Vs United States

    1419 Words  | 6 Pages

    The United States has repeatedly called upon China to be harsher on North Korea; a request for cooperation in an otherwise politically hostile environment. Recent sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council shows that China and the US do in fact wish to cooperate on North Korea, however, it took compromise on the part of the United States in order to get China to agree to the terms. The increasing power of China is reflected in this decision, as the United States has, historically, not been a nation willing to compromise – usually, other states are the abiding ones. China’s ability to hold the sanctions hostage pending cooperation from the United States shows the country’s self-determination influencing international decisions. Furthermore, this persuasive action of China (and Russia, for what it is worth) in this agreement undermines the sanctity of the United Nations, and exemplifies the reality of the realist approach to international governance; that there isn’t one.

    Read More

  • Social Conflict Theory Paper

    223 Words  | 1 Pages

    It also poses the problem of global warfare and the reintroduction of nuclear weaponry following the Cold War.

    Read More

More about 2. What Is The Sudan Doing To Support Or Condemn This Issue?

Open Document