ipl-logo

4th Amendment Case Study

926 Words4 Pages

Cell phones and other mobile devices have quickly entered the mass market and are available to most people around the world. These devices are so prevalent that it is now considered rare to make an arrest without encountering them as some form of evidence, primarily because of the amount of data that they contain. The 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution includes the right of citizens to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant issued upon probable cause, but whether or not such searches and seizures of the digital content contained in these devices is included in this fundamental protection is an issue that has been under much scrutiny over the past few decades. In order to decide whether it is, …show more content…

Several items were seized and later used to convict Chimel, and Chimel claimed this to be an infringement of his 4th amendment protection against an unreasonable search and seizure. When the case of Chimel v California eventually made its way to the Supreme Court, the Court held that the search was, in fact, unreasonable since the entire search of the home was not “within immediate control” of the arrestee, and that a search warrant must be obtained to search any space that is not within that area (i). The Chimel decision is crucial to the concept of cell phone privacy as it concluded that if a cellular device were to be placed in an area within that immediate control of the suspect, and incident to arrest, that device could legally be searched and seized and would be admissible in court as evidence against the …show more content…

In the Robinson case, the Court decided that the 4th amendment includes the full warrantless search of a person and his or her property, within immediate control, at the time of arrest, but without any identifiable danger to police. With this specific decision, the Court places more power on the government as it allows them to obtain such evidence without needing to justify such searches. Similarly, in New York v Belton, the Court concluded that when an individual is subject to a lawful custodial arrest, police are constitutionally permitted to a warrantless search of the passenger compartment of that person’s vehicle if it was in immediate control at the time of arrest (ii). Belton expands the Chimel rule to apply to vehicles by clarifying that an individual has a lesser expectation of privacy of their automobile when they are lawfully

Show More
Related

  • Billy Greenwood And Dyanne Van Houten Summary

    602 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1988, California v. Billy Greenwood and Dyanne Van Houten was about a suspecting of selling and using drugs in Mr. Greenwood house a narcotic officer told the man to bring her the trash bag which Greenwood had placed out the street for pick up, but as the officer search the bags she found drug paraphernalia which was used as evidence to convict Mr. Greenwood but the lower court revoked it because she search the trash bag without a warrant and that was a violation of the fourth amendment. but the trash bags was placed on the street were any child or animal can unseal it so he could not argue about his privacy if it was out in the police for anything or any person to expose the content of the bags but the court stated “ the police cannot reasonably be expected to avert their eyes from evidence of criminal activity that could have been observed by any member of the public “ this means

    Read More

  • People V. Riley Case Brief

    463 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pp. 5–28. (a) A warrantless search is reasonable only if it falls within a specific exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. See Kentucky v. King, 563 U. S. ___, ___. The well-established exception at issue here applies when a warrantless search is conducted incident to a lawful arrest.

    Read More

  • Arizona Vs Gant Case Study

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    The court also used Preston v. United States 376 U.S. 364, 367-368, 84 S. Ct. 881, 11 L. Ed. 2d 777 (1964). In Preston, the search-incident-to-arrest exception does not apply if the area where police officers want to search is not in any way accessible to the arrestee. The court also used New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S. Ct. 2860, 69 L. Ed. 2d 768 (1981), which applies to vehicle searches, the court held that when an officer lawfully arrests “the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of the automobile” and any containers

    Read More

  • 4th Amendment: The Hudson V. Palmer Case

    496 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 4th amendment states that the right to privacy should not by violated by conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. In the hudson v. Palmer case, an inmate named Russel Palmer sued Ted Hudson who was an officer at the Virginia prison. Palmer stated that the officer had conducted a shakedown of his locker and cell in the attempt to find hidden contraband. After the search turned out to be unsuccessful, Officer Hudson, then charged Palmer for destroying state property, as they found a ripped pillow case in his cell. Ted Hudson won the case, as the court stated that the right to privacy does not apply within a prison cell.

    Read More

  • Arnie's Confidentiality Policy

    2313 Words  | 10 Pages

    Because technology is continually growing, new laws are being passed regarding technology and confidentiality. This article questions the “invasive” internet searches and looks for a constitutional answer. As of now, no electronic device can be confiscated and searched without a warrant. This could prove to be beneficial for Arnie. If he was to report Mr. Bowen’s suspicious data to the police, they would be able to obtain a warrant to officially search Mr. Bowen’s computer.

    Read More

  • How Do Phone Snooping Violate The 4th Amendment

    248 Words  | 1 Pages

    A phone with bank information can be a top prize for a treacherous police officer. They can go to your home, text contacts, even steal identities if you put enough information on alleged “secure” personal devices. Phone snooping violates the 4th amendment, which says "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”. When Gregory Diaz, a California resident who was seen participating a drug deal, was ordered to hand over his phone to an officer without a warrant, it violated the amendment. The Supreme Court, when notified about the case, decided that Diaz’s case was an exception to the 200 y/o rule.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Of Timothy Carpenter

    1800 Words  | 8 Pages

    Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cellphone records revealing the location and movements of a cellphone user of the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment? Facts: In April 2011, a group of four men were arrested for a series of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio. One of the four men confessed to the crimes, and he gave the FBI his number along with the number of everyone else involved in the crime. One of the people convicted in the crime was Timothy Carpenter.

    Read More

  • Reasonableness And Fourth Amendment Analysis

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    B. WARRANTLESS AND NONCONSENSUAL BLOOD TESTS ARE PRESUMPTIVELY UNREASONABLE AND MUST BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES Reasonableness is the touchstone of Fourth Amendment analysis. Whether a search is unreasonable "depends on all of the circumstances surrounding the search or seizure and the nature of the search or seizure itself,’” and entails “‘balancing its intrusion on the individual 's Fourth Amendment interests against its promotion of legitimate governmental interests.’” Against this backdrop, at least one court has held that “a warrantless blood test, performed without consent, is presumptively unreasonable unless the state actors involved had probable cause and exigent circumstances sufficient to justify

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cell phone can unveil information within our call history, text messages, pictures, and even internet searches. Access to our cell phones is like access to our lives. No matter how much time passes, the fourth amendment continues to

    Read More

  • Importance Of Privacy Under The Fourth Amendment

    774 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, the government could be trying to find a terrorist, for example, and be searching phones and/or emails. Furthermore, the Fourth Amendment guarantees people the right to privacy, makes American Citizens feel safe, and precludes worry about

    Read More

  • United States Law: The Border Search Exception

    336 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the case United States vs. Cotterman in 2013 it was argued that electronic devices should not be subject to search without reason for suspicion. There are a number of cases involving

    Read More

  • Crime Scene Immigrant In The Criminal Justice System

    1030 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the criminal justice system a police officer or crime scene investigator cannot legally search a person or property without a search warrant. There have been ongoing debates and revisions on the legal requirements and circumstances under which it is necessary to obtain a search and seizure warrant before crime scene processing. According to the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements, a warrant is required any time a reasonable expectation of privacy exists. Therefore, in an effort to protect the right of the people and their belongings against unreasonable search and seizures and up hold the law officials accountable for fair treatment and processing procedures.

    Read More

  • Mobile Phone Tracking Scrutinized Summary

    237 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Mobile Phone Tracking Scrutinized,” published in the Information Management Journal, associate editor Nikki Swartz identifies the issue of whether the judicial system should allow cell phone tracking records be used in courts. Although it can prove a person innocence of guilt, it violates various laws that have been implemented to protect the privacy of citizens. Questions arise to whether allowing location information should be obtained without the consumer’s knowledge. Swartz notes that in many cases “prosecutors have asked courts for the right to obtain cell-tracking data as a suspect is moving.” (Allyn & Bacon 219)

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Law Enforcement

    938 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since 1976, the high court have been discussing the so-called “third party” doctrine when it ruled bank records obtained without a warrant could be used to prosecute a Georgia moonshiner. Back in 2012, the Supreme Court unanimously said the police cannot attach Global Positioning Systems on a suspected drug dealer’s car to track his movement. Two years later, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled the police need a warrant to search the cellphones that are seized during arrest. In this case, the idea that there is no “physical intrusion” of the device flagged questions whether one’s privacy is being

    Read More

  • John Locke Social Contract Theory

    965 Words  | 4 Pages

    In late 2015, the case Apple vs. the FBI went to the courts, in which the FBI requested Apple to install a way for the bureau to access the information stored on a San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone. The company denied the request, as this would contradict their position on consumer privacy and avoid setting a ‘dangerous precedent’ in allowing private, personal information to be accessed without user permission. This situation shows that even large corporations handling millions of people’s data daily understand limits, and that sharing that information would be a breach of a natural right to privacy, although limited through their use of the device. It is a part of the judicial system and also written in the Fourth Amendment that there will be “no unreasonable search or seizure,” accounting for the use of warrants to legally obtain evidence or conduct a search in pursuit of information. If the United States holds these practices required in physical evidence/searches, online searches should be held to the same standards, especially because of the amount of personal information stored “securely”

    Read More

More about 4th Amendment Case Study

Open Document