The Fourth Amendment is “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” In other words, it is against the law for police to search any person without probable cause and an issued warrant. (Cartoon Surveillance) This protects the privacy of the innocent people that may not be considered guilty. However, giving the people a right to a warrant is only giving them an advantage, while the police and the government have a disadvantage.
The convenient thing about this is that you can do as you please without the worry of the government trying to disrupt your peace. It also helps people of color feel protected from police officers who could be racist, and just want to go through their belongings to arrest them. Another advantage to this is that you don 't have to let police officers inside of your home if you don 't please to do so. However, the downside to this amendment is that valuable time to police officers is wasted since they have to wait for a search warrant to proceed with their job. Another downside is that if they do happen to search someone without a warrant and they find what they were looking for it won 't be able to be used as evidence against the
In 1787 the United States’ constitution was written, two years later the Bill of Rights was added. The Bill of Rights consists of ten amendments which were designed based on the American ideals to ensure that the federal government is not too powerful, and that it would protect the rights of the people or of the state. One of the most important amendments in the Bill of Rights is the sixth amendment which gives the people the right to enjoy a speedy trial when accused, and it allows the accused person to know the cause of accusation and who his accuser is. It clearly represents some of the American ideals such as: democracy, equality, and opportunity. The sixth amendment provides more requirements for a fair trial in criminal cases.
Based upon my research, the exclusionary rule should not apply to an illegal arrest. The exclusionary rule was a court created deterrent and remedy, to keep law enforcement from violating the Fourth Amendment when conducting searches and seizures ("The Fourth Amendment And The Exclusionary Rule - Findlaw"). It is mainly used to exclude incriminating evidence that was gathered illegally to be introduced into the court as evidence against a person. The rule was developed to give individual’s rights and civil liberties the maximum protection from improper conduct and procedures from law enforcement ("The Fourth Amendment And The Exclusionary Rule - Findlaw"). Even when an illegal arrest occurs does not necessarily mean that all errors will justify invoking the exclusionary rule.
The first part is “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed”, and the second part “nor cruel and unusual punishments.” For the first part it is because bail is used to encourage the idea that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, the court is not allowed to impose any unwarranted payments in money or property. It’s also to help make sure that bail is affordable for everyone and not made just the top one percent can pay bail. For the second part it is mainly because of Titus Oates gave out unnecessary inhumane punishments out to the wrong people. Due to this the second part of the eighth amendment prevents the state and federal governments from handing out cruel and unusual punishments to criminals.
In the United States there are many rights. Freedom of Speech is one of the most important rights. People are allowed to give their opinions about the government, they are able too without getting in any trouble with the law. This right is very important because it allows people to express their opinions. Freedom of religion is another very important right.
In conclusion, the Magna Carta has had a profound impact on democracy. Significant ideals were modeled throughout declarations, justice is protected, and fundamental freedoms are ensured. Without the Magna Carta, there would not be democracy, and the known world would become
If people want to share their opinions on how the government is doing, they are able to do so without the fear of getting in trouble with the law. It’s also a way to defend one’s self from courts but in an unharmful way. Freedom of religion is another right to the amendment that is also very important. Freedom of religion is the choice whether a person decides to practice a religion or not. When people are allowed to have freedom of religion, it makes living in the US better due to the fact that not many other countries have this type of practice.
According to the Bill of Rights Institute the Fifth Amendment gives a criminal defendant the right to not testify at trail and this stops the prosecutor, the judge and even the defendant’s lawyer can’t force the defendant to take the witness stand against their will. The Fifth Amendment states that no one maybe deprived of life, liberty or property without “due process of law” and there is two types of due process which are procedural which is fairness and substantive. According to the Fifth Amendment it protects a criminal defendant from double jeopardy and the reason’s are that it’s to prevent the government from using it’s superior resources so it would wear down and convict an innocent person. It also protects individuals from the financial,
And these freedoms are important because they keep you safe and it helps you through life. Freedom of speech is important because then you 're able to say what you want without someone telling you that it 's wrong. Freedom of religion is important is important because then you are able to choose your religion and you 're able to go to church. Freedom to make your own choice is when you 're able to choose what you want and not someone else or letting someone else make your decision for
I want to thank Mr Koll, my partner Kevin, and the opposition side of Kara and Khala for giving us this opportunity to debate such a great topic in front you guys today. First I want to clarify that this isn’t a black lives matter issue nor is this a blue lives matter issue. This is an issue that must not be seen on the screens of social media, but in the hands of the law. It is critical that the opposition realizes that the opinionated negative view of indicting an officer without a grand jury isn’t necessary, and it’s unjustful to the duties of a police officer.
What the miranda rights mean to me What is the reason to having the miranda rights?Not many people have heard of the miranda rights. On the other hand cops that have heard of the miranda rights should know them and if they don 't and arrest someone and they go in front of a judge and was to say they didn 't know anything about their rights they would be set free. If the police ask me questions i would want my miranda rights read to me because i would like to know my rights as an american citizen what i could do and what i couldn 't do but if i didn 't know that i didn 't have to talk and i told the officer something that i didn 't want them knowing about while there was no lawyer.
According to criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/bribery.html, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in 1977 makes it unlawful for a United States citizen, as well as certain foreign issuers of securities, to pay a foreign official in order to obtain business with any person. Thus, if a judge or jury was persuaded or bribed to place you in jail, guilty or not, then that’s simply prejudiced. No one should bribe another to put a faultless citizen in jail. We should all stand together to prevent others from being treated unfairly in
Officers are mandatory to read the Miranda Rights to suspects before questioning. Miranda rights gives suspects an opportunity to not answer questions from the police and to be knowledgeable of their constitutional rights. After suspects hear their Miranda right they know that their answers will be used against them for evidence in the court room. The reason the government required the Miranda Rights law because suspects or not everyone has the constitutional rights and it 's up to the police to determine if the suspect is guilty. Miranda Rights isn 't necessary helping out guilty defendant, but it 's a better procedure to detain suspects without violating their constitutional rights.
The idea was to allow religious freedom as long as it does not violate the rights of others (fee.org). These must not be ignored, but instead be more reason to separate church from