Animals have feelings and lives too. “Like people, animals want to live, they also love and feel pain. Animals shouldn’t have to die just because some humans consider hunting to be fun.” (¨There Are Still People¨) Why would we take away a life just to use it as an award, especially since it’s against the law? It illegal to import animal hunting trophies. “Many animals imported as trophies are members of species protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), such as leopards and African elephants, the importation of endangered and threatened species is only for scientific research, enhancement of propagation, or survival of the species.
Introduction to the topic Save endangered species mean that we need to rescue the species of animal that are become lesser and lesser each day. Examples like white tiger, rhino , elephant etc. The reason of why this animal become lesser is because they are being hunted for their skin, paw, tusk , horn to satisfies human needs and wants. This endangered species also include the plant species. If we didn’t save the endangered species , the balance in the ecosystem will be affect.
Excessive purchase of products takes a lot from nature food and material depletes from nature money and food. Another aspect of keeping the environment is for people need to take care of what they have until they are over. He compares this better as opposed to buying things impulsively as they may not play a significance role of human. In this, he equates the human life to that of the nature that surrounds them. This renders the human to be effective for those that seek to conserve their surrounding for a better
That is why I go against the method of taxing; however, I still believe free housing should be achieve. I believe that the best way of solving this would be creating a non profit foundation with a goal of providing homeless and poor people with accommodations. Building houses for many people may be a little out of reach because it would take a lot of resources, I believe a better way is to build a big complex/apartments for people. The article suggests that people does not like living in accommodations like hostels because there are many people and it does not feel like home, which I agree with. However, when you are given free accommodations, I feel like you should not be picky and appreciate it
As a town council in charge of money, this makes logical sense, as they would want to save as much money as possible, giving alms only to certain people who “deserve” it more than others - especially during a time when people were unsure of who to give alms to. William Turner, an English doctor, wrote how the poor “would much rather be sick and live with … idleness” than to be well and to honestly earn their living “through handwork” (Document 4). Turner, another person trying to discover who to give alms to during a dark time for Catholics, when asked if he would give the poor money, was astonished when the poor declined his offer to heal them. Turner then came to the conclusion that all poor people should not get alms as they are all lazy, not wanting to accept his “gifts” to help them out. Turner does not quite seem to understand that the poor does not need to be “healed” religiously and instead need direct action like food or money to survive - that is why those people who asked him for money did accept his healing, because they need money or food to live.
However, this statement is also saying that farming is something that is essential for humans and has grown a lot which makes stopping wildlife farming difficult. The author also states ways that you can have wildlife farming and preserve wild animals, but even those options were limited. At the end of the article the author states, “The challenge is to persuade people accustomed to exploiting an entire planet’s species to get by with perhaps a few hundred. But the danger otherwise is that we will end up on a planet with no wildlife at all.” This statement proves how wildlife conservation is needed and how that is challenging too. Overall, I liked this article’s deep insights into the effects that wildlife farming has on
The general idea of conservation is to help keep a species of animals around for as long as we can, so killing the animals we are trying to conserve does not sound like the smartest idea. However, the data has frequently shown that, when done in a controlled manner, hunting can be a great tool for supporting conservation. It can be beneficial through supplying funds directly to conservation causes, through economic impact and by creating pressure to preserve habitat. With the continuing pressures that humans place on wildlife, the conservation of that wildlife for future generations has become an important issue. As the human population continues to grow and encroach on wild areas, wildlife has had fewer and fewer places to live in.
To conclude, with this end people must do their part in making decisions in life. For example, a making bad or god decisions before acting or hurting a living being. Some people have the idea of helping others but at the same time they cannot because they find it difficult to be able to help those people who need it. If all animal, human and leaf life is considered sacred for all people. Seeing that the animal or people and leaf animal looks aggressive being that the only way to stop it is in making a bad decision.
Firstly I would like to point out that Ritual slaughter should be done away from the city as it might affect loads of people who are viewing these disgusting and terrible scenes. Try and do it in a quiet area if people feel there is any need to continue these killings. Another way which might make thing a little bit better is to try and make the killing a bit more peaceful for the animals. Instead of slaughtering them brutally, try and find way that won't keep the animals in such pain that they will be in grief throughout the whole process. Try and take care of them and be a bit lenient towards them and treat them with extreme care.
Just because you spend a lot of money on anti-obesity, you just can't make people live the way you think is best for them. If that person doesn't want to work out or start eating their fruit and vegetables to stay healthy, that should be on them they should take that responsibility, you can't force them to live the life that they don't want. Having that issue in public isn't going to change how people eat and exercise just making them even lazier. If it were private, then people would have started to work out, eating fruits, etc. on their own and not because someone else wants to and that how it should