Summary Of Why Literature Matters By Dana Gioia

Some may say that educational systems are superior, however, some can argue that the educational system needs a change. Francine Prose’s purpose in “I Know Why The Caged Bird Cannot Read” stood out clearly, to inform parents on how the current system of education is ineffective to young learners. Her use of words, ethos, logos and pathos appeals to educators and students to inspire change in their education standards.

In this essay, "Why Literature Matters", author Dana Gioia sets up an argument about literature. Which she uses various ways to persuade her audience be in favor of her proposal; by showing statistic evidence, facts, and historical evidence, as well as some ironies, diction, and the appeals to reader's emotion.

The proposal that adolescents’ interest in literature has diminish in America is clearly voiced by Dana Gioia, in the article, “Why Literature Matters”. Although, Gioia used different methods to persuade his readers, one way he tried to persuade is by indicating the disadvantages of not reading in society today.

Dana Gioia creates a passage encouraging, influencing, and informing the reader of the recent literacy rate decline. He begins by verbalizing the problem, then moving to how it connects to business, then finally the decline affecting politics. Gioia uses evidence such as facts and quotes to support this idea and drive the thoughts into the reader’s head. These strategies, build his argument and assists with persuading the reader on how this decline will have a negative effect on society.

In the passage the author Dana Gioia argues and states that the literacy rate here in the United States is dropping very fast. The author claims that “the interest young Americans showed in the arts and especially literature actually diminished.Gioia is stating that many young Americans throughout the United States are not reading and that is making the literacy rate to decrease. Making our literature status go down.

Writer have different way of getting their point across, like in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? By Nicholas Carr. He makes an argument that google is a convenient tools and is making us less able to process deep information. He use ethos, pathos, logos and tone to prove his ideas. Carr want the audience to feel a connection to his article.

In the essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that utilization of the internet has an adverse effect on our way of thinking and functioning in everyday life. Whether it be reading a newspaper, or scrolling through Facebook, internet media has forever stamped its name in our existence.

In the text, Dana states his argument by saying that Americans are losing interest in the arts and literature. Dana supports his arguments by using the 2002 survey of public participation in Arts with additional consensus similar to this, recites the quote of a known author and uses parallelism like “imagination, creativity and high order of thinking.” The main idea or purpose is to draw attention to this problem and to try to fix it because it will pose a serious danger for the future. The primary audience is the youth of the American people.

In the article “Why literature matters” by Dana Gioia he builds an argument by explaining how reading is declining more in America and, how it is causing a negative impact on society.

In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, the author presents information on the decline in literature among young adults in America. Gioia builds the argument and persuades the readers through various mediums such as; the use of surveys, making connections to other fields related to the subject, and further explaining possible consequences of the problem.

Despite great leaps and bounds in sectors such as the information media and higher education, young Americans are showing increasingly less and less interest in the arts and literature. In "Why Literature Matters," author Dana Gioia poses a compelling argument that a decline in literary interest poses a threat to American society and economy. One of the broader notions presented in the essay is that skills gained through reading literature are conducive to an individual's survival in the business world and participation in the civic world. Gioia deftly delivers a cogent argument to sway his readers by using real-world applications of literary skills, citations of credible sources, and evocative language.

Science has proven that reading can provoke positive changes in us as human beings. Annie Murphy Paul is the author of the article ‘Your Brain on Fiction’ published on March 17, 2012. Annie explains how researchers have discovered that reading can initiate different parts of the brain, this is the reason why sometimes literature can make the reader so engaged and attached to a piece of writing. Research also explains how reading has the ability to produce activity in our brain’s motor cortex. Finally, Annie explains how reading fictional pieces can change how you interact with other individuals.

“Why Literature Matters,” a passage by Dana Gioia, explains the situation of literature. Gioia expresses unease with how the once respected way of learning is declining in schools and businesses. He incorporates research done by other companies and colleges to further express his concern, with good evidence and proof, thus bringing the problem to a greater light.

While reading is something used in everyday life the author of “Why Literature Matters” ; Dana Gioia discusses that this is not the case for modern young adults. Gioia builds the argument that the amount of reading is declining and such a change will bring negative consequences on American society. To sway the audience the author uses persuasive techniques such as diction, statistics, reports and world to reading

Today students major in areas such as medicine, engineering and business yet, not many major in liberal arts. Why is that? Steve Pearlstein, a writer and a Robinson Professor of Public Affairs at George Mason University, in his article “Meet the parents who won’t let their children study literature” (2016), argues that college students should be able to pursue the career they want rather than listen to what their parents want for them. He supports his argument by providing testimonies, statistical evidence, and studies. The author’s purpose is to encourage all students to consider a profession in liberal arts. Out of all his appeals, his strongest were both logical and ethical because he provided an amount of sources that build up his credibility.