Forgiveness and revenge go hand in hand, many times in order to reach forgiveness the person must get revenge. After a bad event occurs to you, the physiological damage will forever be with you. In the short story “A Dish Best Served Cold”, Aminatta explains her journey to reaching forgiveness on her fathers killer. “At the start of this remarkable memoir, Laura Blumenfeld confesses that she never really overcame the emotions aroused by the attempt on her father ’s life, and had nursed revenge fantasies about it” (Forna 2). Aminatta had emotions that wanted to get revenge on the murderer, and it is normal to have these feelings. Many people nurse these same emotions, and think they must get even with the person to get forgiveness. In some societies they have a system set up for revenge. “In Albania there is codified revenge. Feuds are passed from generation to generation, vengeance a filial duty governed by a 15th-century canon, which is in turn interpreted by a Blood Feud Committee” (Forna 2). Some societies believe revenge is the only way to forgiveness, which we know is untrue. Simply having a …show more content…
“Vengeance is in my heart, death in my hand, Blood and revenge are hammering in my head. Hark Tamora, the empress of my soul” (II, i). Aaron says this while harming Lavinia to get back at Titus. Now this event will cause chaos within the empire and lead to a major fight. The characters are so obsessed with getting revenge that Tamora thinks she can trick Titus into believing she is revenge. “Know, thou sad man, I am not Tamora; She is thy enemy, and I thy friend: I am Revenge: sent from the infernal kingdom, To ease the gnawing vulture of thy mind” (V,i). Tamora even promises Titus she will be revengeful on whomever he asks her too, however Titus knows it's a trick. Overall the characters are so obsessed with getting revenge, they don't realize what it's doing to each other and the
Shots flew through the air, horses screeched, and blood splattered. It was The War on Powder River, written by Helena Huntington Smith, where independent cow herders in a battle against large corporations and other independent ranchers. It was fought over land, cattle, and reputation and it was bloody. A shot from a high caliber rifle cracked through the cold dawn, sheep scattered, and blood from a young man splattered. The killer’s shot was a hit and was written about in the fictional book Cold Dish, by Craig Johnson.
Scene 1-contact Director-Hello,this is the movie the red prince. This is a story of an assassin. Hope you enjoy. Narrator-On a warm summer evening the a strange man walks into a dark and small room.
Revenge: A Narrative and Scientific Perspective Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado” and Browning’s “My Last Duchess” both revolve around revenge. We are introduced to men who swear vengeance on other characters. Yet, the mindsets of these men are, in some aspects, very different. To truly comprehend a story, we have to understand why authors make their characters behave the way they do in addition to the message being presented. In the case of “The Cask of Amontillado” and “My Last Duchess,” why do both narrators believe murder is totally necessary?
Betrayal comes in many shapes and sizes. Everyone eventually gets betrayed even if it’s by family or friends maybe even a girlfriend or boyfriend. In my case it’s family. My dad to be exact. When you get betrayed it damages you.
Revenge is a real thing in today’s society. It happens every day. There are different reasons for revenge from as small, as a small child stealing a stick of gum to a drug dealer murdering a nark. Regardless, taking revenge in itself may be for the greater good, or evil.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines the word ‘Massacre’ as ‘The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people or (less commonly) animals; carnage, butchery, slaughter in numbers;’ (2000). The word ‘massacre’ implies that Tamora’s revenge, or her anger can no longer be justified as it ‘indiscriminate’. We as the audience should not feel inclined to sympathise with her any longer. She has made her decision, and one that inevitably ends in tragedy. In many productions of ‘Titus Andronicus’ Tamora can be seen wearing warrior like dresses.
This violent depiction is the beginning of the revenge cycle the play portrays. The aforementioned event is an act of systemic violence: it is legally permitted by Rome, but the in the aftermath is catastrophic for Tamora and her family. The potential for aggression is intrinsic to Roman law, and a customary penance in the juridical capacity is by all accounts an appropriate reaction; no disagreements are taken note of. However, the caliber of legally-sanctioned violence becomes problematic when Titus executes one of his own sons for defiance.
Vengeance has been an ongoing problem for many centuries. In the long run, with the new generation, they have been following the same pattern to get revenge, without knowing the reasons why. If no one is willing to stop and think it over, to evaluate if it’s worth the risk, then the act of vengeance will be ongoing at the cost of many lives. Many people do not realize that having to avenge the death of a loved one will take so much time and patience in their lives. In the short story, “An Act of Vengeance,” by Isabel Allende, the issue involves a young girl who gets raped by Tadeo Cespedes, whom also killed her father on the same day.
at the beginning of the act, Tamora, the captive of the Goths, delivers this speech :"". Because she and her sons are captured by Titus Andronicus, Titus wants to sacrifice Tamora's oldest son as a memorial to Titus' 21 sons who died during the war. She talks to Titus Andronicus solely to convince him to not slaughter her first born son and have mercy on her. In the sense that Titus has fought the brutal war for ten years and are in the hatred of 21 dead sons, Titus killed Tamora's son no matter how she begs him.
Medea plots her revenge by murdering the king, the bride and her two children in order to make Jason suffer and take away everything Jason cared about. The Greek gods felt that Medea was in her right and they proved this by allowing and even helping her escape in the end of the play
“Retribution” or “Retributive justice” can be defined as “a theory of justice that considers punishment, if proportionate, to be the best response to crime.” (Wikipedia, 2016) Peter Koritansky, philosopher and author made a distinction between two views on retributive punishment in his work entitled “Two theories of retributive punishment: Immanuel Kant and Thomas Aquinas” in 2005 in which he believed that the Thomistic understanding of retribution is superior to that of Kant and this write-up is going to outline the reasons as to why he think this is the case. To illustrate this, it is vital therefore that we understand the Kantian retributivism and Aquinas’s understanding of punishment. Firstly the Kantian retributivism or the theory of retributive by Immanuel Kant suggests that punishment in the form of coercion of force is necessary to establish justice and to punish criminals, he emphasized that “Punishment by a court…can never be inflicted merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or for civil society, but that it must always be inflicted upon him for the fact that he has committed a crime”
Medea was treated unfairly in the patriarchal society that she lived in and due to the circumstances she was forced to abide by, she sought to achieve her own form of justice. Women were mistreated and regarded as inferior to men. In fact, Medea mentioned how women were like foreigners forced to abide by their husband’s laws and remain subservient. Essentially, women were treated as outsiders and were thought to need constant protection from male figures. So, when the King of Corinth kicked her and her children out of Corinth and Jason left them, she wanted revenge since she felt she had been wronged.
Lush explains “Although Euripides did not cast Medea as a male solider as its protagonist, the play depicts Medea as suffering from the background Trauma, betrayal, isolation and consequent symptoms attributed to combat veterans with lasting psychological injuries” (Lush, 2014, p. 25). Hence using Lush’s view on Medea’s character as a devoted warrior suffering from Traumatic hardships in her experiences with the man she gave everything to, we can understand why she wanted revenge. Medea believes Jason owes her more than just the normal husband-wife obligations a man swears to when marrying a woman; in her view, she helped him be the man that he is and supported him throughout his heroic journey. Without her, Jason would not have succeeded in retrieving the Golden Fleece. Without her, he would not have had his father resurrected.
Punishment is an infliction of a penalty that resulted from an offence. Punishment is also naturally justified when administered to those who deserve it. Retributivists claim that people who break the law deserve the punishment they get. Retributivism views punishment as a fair judgment and believe that the state should punish those who are found guilty of their wrongdoing because they deserve it. A person deserves the same treatment they inflict on others.
Revenge can be a horrible emotion; it can sometimes lead people to do horrible things. By definition, Revenge means to get retribution for a wrongdoing done to you. In my opinion, revenge is mostly caused by fear and the overwhelming feeling of payback Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and religions, and even the American culture. Though it often leads one to perform criminal acts, Howard argues that it is a necessary component in the functioning of society. He points out that revenge is a threat that acts as a disincentive to undeserved violence.