A Doll's House Character Analysis

It seems as if she enjoys Torvald’s teasing, and speaks with excitement about the extra money his new job will provide. She does not seem to care that she possesses these characteristics and behaves this way. When she asks Torvald for more money despite having just been on a spending spree, she appears selfish and very needy. After her talk with Mrs. Linde, the word is out the bag that she is not gathering

Without the physical act of retaliation, there would be nothing to discuss. When discussing feminism, the theme that both The Awakening and A Doll’s House bring up, it can be argued that the women’s acts of rebellion were more harmful to their families than helpful. One factor unmentioned in the discussion of Edna and Nora’s rebellions are the families that both women left behind. Both Nora and Edna ultimately abandoned their children in an attempt to find a greater sense of self. Thus, Nora and Edna betray their obligation and duties as mothers.

During the 19th century, women were overshadowed by the men of their household, therefore they had no sense of independence nor dominance. In Mary Freeman’s short story, “The Revolt of Mother,” the author presents Sarah Penn, a woman who takes a stand against her husband. In the beginning, the reader learns that Sarah is a hardworking mother and wife. She maintains the household work and meets her children needs. She is suddenly confused of her husband’s actions concerning their future.

They were degraded and debased by hands to believe that they were worth almost nothing, only worthy of bearing children. This superfluous male domination tip to many women feeling snare in their own homes, unable to dodging from the childbed placed on them by their hubby. An illumination of these confines was accounted by Charlotte Perkins Gilman , a feminist writer of the nineteenth century, in her short account “The Yellow Wallpaper ”. In this story, Gilman portrays herself as a woman who is woe from post-partum depression. The woman is locked away from gild in a confined room, only to drive herself even more insane.

However, it was not immediately seen as this. This is because people of the nineteenth century did not have access to texts that would have made the “female meaning” clear. (Haney-Peritz 122) Gilman wrote “The Yellow Wallpaper” cryptically compared to other literature at the time. There are different ideas on why it is viewed as a feminist text. Haney-Peritz suggests that in writing “The Yellow Wallpaper”, Gilman learned “a woman could only imagine that she had found herself, for until the material conditions of social life were changed, there was no “real” way out of mankind’s ancestral mansion of many apartments.” (Haney-Peritz 124) Another idea Bak presents is that the text indicted the men who were responsible for the narrator’s confinement and mental demise (Bak 39).

Survival: the Art of Manipulation Women have been oppressed and viewed as weak throughout history. To survive in society and to obtain any kind of authority, women had to use the art of manipulation. Henrik Isben’s play, The Doll House, and William Shakespeare’s play, Titus Andronicus, have one persisting issue: gender oppression. By comparing and contrasting Nora, a character in Henrik Isben’s play, to Tamora, a character in William Shakespeare’s play, two women who lived over two thousand years apart both faced female oppression. Tamora, taken captive by the Romans, was forced to wed Saturninus who is king of the Romans.

Today’s women would say they would like an equal partnership in a marriage (something), but historically this was not always possible. In 1870’s Norway, Henrick Ibsen A Doll’s House takes place, woman where not allowed decision making privileges or any other equal freedom. Nora, the protagonist showed signs of being independent by taking out a lone, and having side jobs, but yet she cannot even enjoy a cookie without her husband’s approval. In the 1800’s women were considered property to the men in their lives. After marriage, women did not have to right to own property, keep a wage, or sign contracts.

At the opening of the play, we find that she eats forbidden sweets behind her husbands back. This is not a huge offense, but it is an action that gives us insight into her deceptive nature. We later discover that she borrowed money, forged a signature, and lied to her husband about it. She justifies her actions with the rational that her deceptive actions stem out of an act of love, thus making them right. She doesn 't see anything wrong with her perception and can often be found covering her deceit with phrases like, “You mustn 't say anything about it to anyone.

Relating a current event to Henrik Ibsen 's A Doll’s House A Doll’s House is the story of a woman who has been infantilized by her husband. She eventually leaves him and his children. It is one of Henrik Ibsen’s most controversial books. It was written at a time when society believed that a woman’s place was at home and that her roles did not extend beyond housekeeping and raising children. The idea of a female choosing a different path was scandalous.

Good authors create interesting characters that evoke some emotion from their readers. That is the case of the protagonist, Mathilde Loisel, in Guy de Maupassant’ story “The Necklace.” Mathilde comes across as selfish and unsatisfied person and is easy to dislike. She first shows the quality of selfishness by purchasing a dress with money which her husband “ had set aside just that amount to buy a rifle” (Maupassant 222). Mathilde was so worried about buying a dress she didn’t even think about her husband. She proves herself to be unsatisfied when she is allowed to pick out some jewelry from her wealthy friend, but she declines the jewelry and asks “‘ haven’t you something else?’”(Maupassant 225).