3.1 The isolation of Aeromonas from several pond waters, healthy fish, and infected fish The isolate of A. hydrophila grown for 24 hours at 37C on Rimler-Shoots+novobiocin medium should show bright yellow color with white edge. Figure 1 shows the control of isolate A. hydrophila ATCC 7699 grown on RS+novobiocin medium. Isolate selection on RS medium resulted in 95 isolates, presumed to be A. hydrophila, which would run the phenospecies test (morphology and biochemistry), based on the protocol of SNI 7303 (2009), plus one control isolate the A. hydrophila ATCC 7699 obtained from Microbiologic Co. Figure 1. The Isolate of A. hydrophila ATCC 7699 Grown on the Rimler-Shoots Agar Medium + Antibiotic Novobiocin at 37C for 24 Hours 3.2 The …show more content…
hydrophila as the control, i.e. around 700 bp (685 bp). While the amplicon resulted from the primer 760 showed various results and sizes. The amplification results using the two pairs of primers showed different results from the same isolate. The Figure 2 shows the examples of various amplification results for the tested two pairs of primers. The seven isolates tested, i.e. A. hydrophila ATCC 7699, SfB, SfN, SfL, SfM, SfP, and PfKT9 had 685 bp amplicon, however when were amplified using the second primers, only the control isolate, SfB, and PfKT9 had 760 bp amplicon. The isolate SfN had two amplicons, which were different from the control isolate; isolate SfL and SfP had single amplicon, but was different from the control, while the isolate SfM did not have …show more content…
and four nonaeromonas species as the outgroup. Those comparing sequences were from genBank and had been verified in EzTaxon. The 38 16S rRNA sequences were aligned and compared. The multialignment result of those 38 isolates showed the samples strongly predicted to be A. hydrophila were not always in one group with the control isolate A. hydrophila ATCC 7699, also not in one group with the reference of A. hydrophila sequence from genBank (A. hydrophila ATCC 7699 and A. hydrophila ATCC 49140). The isolates which were in a group with A. hydrophila were SfB, HfMlp, HfNp, PfKT9, PfKBl, while the isolate HfT was in a group with A. jandaei, and PfKC with A. enteropelogenes and A. taiwanensis. Isolates divided into six groups, the grouping by region of sequence 16SrRNA 980-1010. The isolates belonged to the first group were in group with A. hydrophila, the second group with A. media and A. salmonicida, the third group contained A. aquariorum, A. punctata, A. caviae and A. taiwanensis. The fourth group was in group with A. enteropelogenes, dan A. jandaei. The fifth group with A. veronii and the sixth group is outgroup. The second group had the characteristic on region 1216, while the fourth and fifth group had the characteristic on region 1234-1239 and
After 5 days the plates were removed from the cold room and the gram-negative test for Colony A on the EMB agar showed pink fisheye colonies which lead to the conclusion that the gram-negative organism within Unknown #21 was Enterobacter aerogenes. Had the pigmentation been metallic green, the organism would have been identified as Escherichia coli, and had there been no pigmentation at all a Triple Sugar Iron agar (TSI) test among other tests would have been
The purpose of this lab report is to employ a myriad of skills, tools and, methods learned throughout this semester to perform the appropriate tests for the identification of the assigned unknown bacteria. Add more background information here!!! The most important tools and techniques used during this identification include aseptic technique, microscopic examination and, the use of selective and differential media. Aseptic technique is an important tool for microbiologists. It is imperative that aseptic technique is maintained throughout the length of any test to avoid any cross-contamination that may lead to inaccurate results.
In this experiment, we cultivated an unknown specimen containing two microorganisms. The purpose of this experiment was to use a variety of biochemical test previously learned in the lab to identify the unknown bacteria. The identification of unknown bacteria is a major part of microbiology. Microbiologist observe samples such as blood and sputum in the laboratory for the presence of microorganisms. Identifying unknown bacteria is extremely important in clinical settings because it helps physicians find treatment for infections.
Purpose: To identify an unknown microorganism by performing a series of biochemical tests on a pure bacterial culture. Materials and Methods: Tests: Lactose fermentation: Fermentation makes energy available for use by microorganisms by anaerobic breakdown of carbohydrates. The product can either be an acid or gas. When it is positive, the broth will turn from red to yellow and if gas is present a bubble is formed.
Unknown Lab Report Abiola Oyewumi March 16, 2015 Unknown #16 Abstract An experiment was conducted to determine which of the following unknown bacteria was in test tube number 16: Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella typhimurium. Biochemical tests were used to help identify the unknown bacteria. The Citrate test, Urease test, Triple Sugar Iron Agar test, Voges-Proskauer test, and Methyl Red test were the biochemical tests used in this experiment.
Introduction: Transforming a gene or genetic information from one organism into another with the hopes that if done successfully the organism with the new DNA will be given new traits is a method known as genetic transformation (Rafter). Genetic transformation is used quite frequently in today’s world, form medicine to agriculture. In this lab we will be inserting a gene into an Escherichia coli bacteria with the help of a plasmid. Escherichia coli bacteria also known as E. coli, is a bacterium that is rod shaped and contains flagella to help it move.
The Unknown Identification Lab was an experiment that provided the opportunity to apply all the tests that were learned in the semester of lab, to identify the two bacterias that remain unknown. Gram- staining and two other tests will be used to identify the unknowns. This experiment is crucial to the understanding of each test, and can benefit in the ability to identify the characteristics of specific bacteria. Having a clearer understanding of the bacteria can further the research of bacteria for medicine, such as antibiotics. The understanding can also help the development of research in the environment.
In the laboratory, identification of an unknown bacterium is often necessary. In the lab, a random sample consisting of three different bacteria was selected. The sample contained one gram-positive, one gram-negative paracolon, and one gram-negative coliform. The purpose of the experiment is to identify each of the three species that the mixture contained. After receiving an unknown mixture, the sample was streaked for isolation onto TSA, blood agar, and MacConkey plates.
Once the streak plate has been inoculated, and colonies have grown, the Catalase test would then be performed. After receiving the results from all the tests listed above, it has been concluded that Escherichia Coli was the unknown bacteria. The first and most important test that should be performed on the bacteria is the Gram Stain. This test is a process of using multiple stains to differentiate between Gram Negative and Gram Positive organisms (Microbugz). If a bacterium is Gram Positive the cells will appear purple
Starch amylase testing was equally unsubstantial since the only amylase producing bacteria was ruled out after Gram staining. Unknown #10’s negative citrate test result was also unhelpful because E. coli is citrate negative and P. vulgaris is a variable citrate producer that can also be citrate negative. H2S production in the Kligler’s Iron Agar test ultimately proved that Unknown #10 was Proteus vulgaris. P. vulgaris is the only assigned bacteria that produces H2S, so when a black precipitate obscured the yellow butt of the Kligler’s Iron Agar slant, E. coli was ruled out. Not only did the H2S product confirmed that Unknown #10 was P. vulgaris, it confirmed P. vulgaris’ motility.
The erythromycin resistance gene is carried by Tn4351. erythromycin resistance colonies were transfer to LB agar containing 200µgml-1 thrimethoprim. Non of the colonies could grow in this medium and no free vector (R751) was obtained in plasmid miniprep. This indicates that no replication of R751 occurred. Colony blot hybridization was done separately to discover if Tn4351 and/or R751 had inserted into the chromosome of F. chinesis.
1. Authors performed the genome sequencing in 2 different laboratories with different primers and other reagents. They also affirm that in Paleogenomic lab were not preformed any previous viral genome analyzing
The sterile cotton swab was inserted in the S. epidermidis culture and twirled around to obtain a specimen. The entire plate was inoculate with the swab from top to bottom, to achieve a lawn of growth. The dry forceps was used to remove the antibiotic disk into the appropriate spot on the plate. This process was repeated for the all antibiotics with aseptic technique being used. The plate was incubate with lid up on the bookshelf at room temperature for 48 hours.
BOLD (Barcode of Life Data Systems) – BOLD is an assembly of a reference library of barcode sequences which assembles molecular, morphological and distributional data. It provides online platform for analyses of DNA sequences. It is a repository for the specimen and sequence records that form the basic data unit of all barcode studies. It aids the management, quality assurance and analysis of barcode data and provides a platform for collaboration across research communities worldwide by joining flexible security and data entry features with web-based delivery (S. RatnaSingham and P. D. N Hebert, 2007; http://www.barcoding.si.edu, www.Boldsystems.org
I approached this by using polymerase chain reactions PCR to effectively amplify regions of the mitochondrial DNA for sequencing. My goal during this project was to sequence the complete mitochondrial genome of S. frugiperda. The following year I received the opportunity to work in Dr. Eric Triplett’s laboratory to determine the enumeration and primer sensitivity for the growth and detection of Liberibacter crescens BT-0. Liberibacter crescens is a bacterial species that is known for causing Huanglongbing (HLB) and Zebra