Susan Glaspell spent most of her life working as a journalist, fiction writer, playwright and promoter of various artistic. “A Jury of Her Peers” wrote by Susan Glaspell is a story that has to do with confusion, murder, lies, it showed how women used to not have right, and also showed women abilities and skills. The story was about a woman's name Minnie Foster Wright was accused of the murder her husband John Wright. In the story, I think Susan wanted us to see women are smart and capable as men are to perform the duties and jobs of everyday life. Throughout Susan Glaspell times women didn't have any right to say or do anything. Women used to stay home to cook, clean and take care of the kids which Mrs. Minnie didn't have. Even in the story …show more content…
Now, her husband put her in a cage where she didn't have anybody to talk to. While the caged canary didn't have any friends to talk, children to feed, and the bird didn't have freedom to fly like any other birds. Minnie Foster scared of cat the same way birds are scared of cat. Minnie scared of the cat because she doesn't want the cat to hurt her; the same way birds are scared of cats to not to eat them. The sheriff's wife was explained how when they brought Minnie she was kind of timid, sweet, and fluttery. Bird look innocent with an expression on the face and they look sweet like the birds saying take Minnie Foster were protecting her bird because the bird was like a child to her and it was her enjoyment. Birds are so protective of their child the minute you try to touch their kids they would hurt you in a heart bit without you knowing. They managed to get directly over their baby and drop food into their baby mouth, which immediately hollered like real mom would do. Minnie Foster feels like she had to protect the birds because the bird was her child. She feeds the bird, talk to the bird when she needs to talk to someone, and the bird was the only noise she hearted inside the house like a kid would do. When she finds out her husband broke her bird's neck, so she went in chock him the same something her husband did to her
He tapped the pane 3 times with his claw… The bird spread his wings and flew up into the maple tree. She grabbed the broom…went outside and shook the branches of the tree… ‘Go,’ she shouted…the bird…flew off into the night”(Otsuka 19-20). The bird is the strongest representation of the theme in the novel. It was taken into captivity by the family and put in a cage
The jury system originated in England hundreds of years ago. The colonists brought the jury system from England to the United States. In 1733, John Zenger, a printer, printed a newspaper critical for the British Government. His attorney convinced the jury to be in favor for Zenger because his criticisms were true. After this trial, it gave ordinary citizens the freedom of speech and the power to go against the king.
Over the years, a plethora of court cases have caused Americans to wonder: is our jury system indeed as wondrous as it is conceived to be? To explain, the jury system is the concept of giving the defendant in a trial the option of either having a bench trial, one where a judge alone reaches a verdict, or a trial by jury, one where a group of twelve ordinary citizens is chosen to reach a verdict on the case. One may wonder why a dozen everyday denizens are being endowed with the absolute power over a possibly life or death decision in the life of a neighbor that is unknown to them, but the framers of the United States Constitution believed that this was the most democratic option in making sure that justice is properly served. Explaining further,
Our jury system stretches all the way back in England hundreds of years ago. Whenever a crime was committed in a community, a judge and his or her jury would come together to put the accused on trial. The judge served more as the legal expert over the trial. However, the jury was made up of twelve men who lived in the area that the crime was committed. These ordinary citizens were the ones that decided the verdict of the case.
“Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” This quote stated by George Bernard Shaw represents America’s jury system perfectly. We should ultimately eliminate the jury system from court, and use the bench system in all criminal and civil cases. Although there are many reasons why eliminating the jury system is a better choice, many people want to keep the jury system only because we have used it for a long time and they fear change. Without change, progress is impossible and those who want to keep the jury system should change their mind.
The dead canary and its cage was a pivotal piece of evidence that the women discovered. The dead bird represents the old Mrs. Wright— Minnie Foster and its cage represents how she was
If Mrs. Wright loved her bird so much she would not have been able to kill the bird, therefore Mr. Wright would have been the only one to break the birdcage and kill the bird. The women converse and conclude that Mr. Wright was probably an aggressive and abusive person, “‘But he was a hard man, Mrs. Peters. Just to pass the time of day
A man sits upon the stand as he hopes for the jury to plead him not guilty. The American Jury System has been in the United States Judicial Branch for over 385 years. The basis of a bench trial is that there is only a Judge that decides whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. Whereas on a jury trial the fate of the accused is proposed to the jury and they would decide whether he is guilty or not guilty. The jury trials provide fairness, it represents citizenship, and there is less of a bias than that of a bench trial.
In the time that “A Jury of Her Peers”, was written women did not have many rights. They also did not have many opportunities to do other things outside their home. They're expected stay home cook clean and take care of the children to their husband came home. Mr. and Mrs. Wright did not have any children nor did she take care of house very well. Her neighbor even told the sheriff this.
Murder today is something that most people do not think about because we are so accustomed to it. Minnie Foster, a lively woman who loses her childhood and becomes a married unhappy lady, so unhappy she kills her own husband. Although at first we are introduced to the bird as the main symbol of the play, we discover that Mrs. Wright is the bird and Mr. Wright is the bird cage trapping her life. By looking at the symbolism of this play we begin to understand that when Mr. Wright killed the canary along with Mrs Wright’s childhood, the motive to kill Mr. Wright was set for Mrs. Wright with the rope.
The men of the group, much like John in “The Yellow Wallpaper,” consider themselves more capable than the women and refuse to consider Mrs. Wright as anything other than irrational. The men leave the women to their “trifles” on the first floor, where they discover a broken bird cage, and the bird’s body, broken, carefully wrapped in a small, decorative box. They realize that Mr. Wright had wrung the neck of his wife’s beloved bird and broken its cage. Mrs. Wright, once known for her cheerfulness and beautiful singing, she stopped singing when she encountered Mr. Wright. Just like he did with the bird, Mr. Wright choked the life out of his wife until, finally, Mrs. Wright literally choked the life out of her husband.
Because of that, Minnie Foster buys a bird in a man around last year selling canaries cheap. The bird used to sing real pretty. John Wright does not like the bird. He thinks the women should do the housework like doing her work in kitchen not buy a bird to sing a song. She does not like housework
The bird is Mrs. Wright. It was locked up in a cage as was Mrs. Wright when her husband was alive. He wasn’t a very “cheerful” man, therefore, people didn’t come to visit them. Over the twenty year time period of their marriage she became lonely, which resulted in her buying a bird and the drastic change in personality. The broken door to the cage represents Mrs. Wright’s freedom from her husband.
He killed that too”, which is an exact representation of how women were inferior, muted, and defused (“A Jury of Her Peers 1643). Because the women felt so inferior to the men, they never spoke up when they found the dead bird which explained that Minnie Foster was the murder of John Wright. Another reason for this action was that Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters felt united as women due to their social status and situation. Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale chose to hide the dead bird and not to disclose the actual murder clues and details they found as it was their moral duty as
By placing the bird so high up, yet incredibly close to the family, it can be taken as a warning. The bird only appears in this single line throughout the excerpt, acting as an observer but also as a predator waiting for a chance to strike, providing an unsettling truth to death being out of our control. Though many efforts may be made to create a sanctuary, there are things out of one's control and when power is exercised, there will be forces fighting back. The opening sections of the novel A Bird in the House demonstrate this clearly by how Margarets Laurence's’ use of literary devices can be interpreted.