Old Sacramento had a lot of changes to remove everything that was in the past to the future. “The Invention of Old Sacramento: A Past for the Future” by Lee M. A. Simpson and Lisa C. Prince, wrote on how old Sacramento changed throughout the years. Old Sacramento is an historical site that reproduces growth of an inner-city with environmental politics and historic preservation movement. Old Sacramento is also a home of successful business during the nineteenth century, due to a district that was created in Old Sacramento. The district had gone through a lot especially protecting Old Sacramento. This essay explains on how Old Sacramento became a mainstream. The essay explains the protection of Old Sacramento. During the 1950s and the 1960s, …show more content…
The West End area was the birth place of Old Sacramento and a place for California history making. “From the city’s founding in 1849, boats carrying global migrants, miners and merchants plied the Sacramento River, arriving at Sutter’s Embarcadero at the foot of J Street. The booming riverfront quickly became the commercial and social hub of the infant city, offering vital supplies and sanctuary to the multitudes of new residents and miners headed for the nearby gold areas” (Lee M. A. Simpson and Lisa C. Prince, Page 292). It explained how the Sacramento River became important for its city, but something changed in Old Sacramento. The state legislature moved their new capitol building on Tenth Street on December 6, 1869, which made the city shift away from the river. Another reason that the river was abandoned was due to the train depot. “Four years later, the Central Pacific Railroad relocated its depot from Front and K Streets to the filled-in Sutter’s Slough, thus moving this important transportation hub away from the river front” (Lee M. A. Simpson and Lisa C. Prince, Page 292). The train depot is a new way to transport people and supplies in a fast and safer way, which made a lot of people to not use the Sacramento River for no use. A lot buildings caused people to ignore the Sacramento River, like the Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament, new city hall and post office, are the proof of people …show more content…
One of the answers is the future planning of Old Sacramento; in 1945 the California Redevelopment Act gave the authority to begin redevelopment in the shattered conditions in Old Sacramento; “Blight was defined as the condition in urban areas that constituted physical and economic liabilities and which required redevelopment ‘in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people’” (Lee M. A. Simpson and Lisa C. Prince, Page 292). Old Sacramento was falling apart and needed to get a rebuild, and something good happened to Old Sacramento. The city council appropriated $3200 to get redevelopment examination. When the examination was completed, the council requested permission to the federal government’s Housing and Home Finance Agency to store $364000 for redevelopment of Old Sacramento. “In order to receive state and federal funds the California Community Redevelopment Act of 1945 and the federal Housing Act of 1949 mandated that cities or countries create a local public agency to plan and manage redevelopment projects in their communities. The city created the Sacramento Redevelop Agency on September 25, 1950, with a mandate to prepare the preliminary financial analysis, studies and plans for redevelopment area” (Lee M. A. Simpson and Lisa C. Prince, Page 292). The areas were the city blocks from the Sacramento River east towards to Tenth Street and to I
In the beginning, people came for the trees, the huge, majestic redwoods were what drew people here. In the 1850’s the gold rush in the San Francisco area needed more
• For example, Oscar Newman's research for the U. S. Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment in the late 1960s included a 740-unit public housing high rise development, Pruitt-Igoe, which never achieved more than 60% occupancy and was torn down about 10 years after its construction at a loss of $300 million, because it had rampant crime. Across the street, an older, smaller row-house complex, Carr Square Village, occupied by an identical population, was fully occupied and free of crime during and after the construction, occupancy, and demolition of Pruitt-Igoe. Newman's research regarding multiple communities, including Pruitt-Igoe, into what caused these differences in crime resulted in a new, but related, term of "defensible space. This
Built in 1705, the Colonial Williamsburg 's capitol had made decisions that have changed the history of the U.S. with years of work put in to validate it. In fact, many decisions by historical geniuses influenced history, and majorly affected our current rights and independence from Britain. In addition, guidelines left behind from the colonial age taught us how to maintain a fair government of which a democracy takes place. Also, Virginia would still be owned by Britain without the capitol. To add on, years of work in the capitol make today a better generation.
One being the Fiscalization of Land Use. Because Proposition 13 reduced the revenues that would be received from property taxes from any particular development (industrial, commercial, or residential), local jurisdictions began to pay even more attention to the fiscal outcomes of land use decisions. In particular, land uses that generated revenues in addition to property taxes became more important. To the extent that land use decisions are now driven by their fiscal consequences. “There are at least three specific instances of fiscalization activities that have been adopted by local government” (Chapman, 11).
First, the piers off the coast of the Embarcadero would be flooded and new beaches could possibly form, necessitating an urban redesign of the whole coast. Structures with cultural value like the Ferry Building and Exploratorium would be lost and very difficult to replace. If these and other large Embarcadero buildings with economic and functional value, like the Embarcadero Youth Chance High School and the Embarcadero YMCA (“Embarcadero (San Francisco),” n.d.), were rebuilt in other parts of San Francisco, residential buildings or areas might have to be demolished. Or, the new buildings could raise rent prices in the area, intensifying the issue of gentrification and homelessness within fifty years of the first floods. Within a hundred years, the city would most likely try to move San Francisco institutions and economically significant buildings away from the coast, like the Embarcadero Center, a four-tower office and shopping complex (“Embarcadero (San Francisco),”
Countless factors weighed in on the urbanization of Cincinnati, but not many assessed the Kilgour family and its impact on Cincinnati’s growth. This prominent and esteemed family had three generations of influence, which fostered the treasures of Cincinnati, through its involvement in steamboats railroad, telephones, real estate, and especially the streetcar system. Throughout history, the development of a neighborhood’s character has always come as a consequence of the multifaceted interactions that the neighborhood had. For Oakley, the foremost influence is public transit. Cities are a vehicle for individuals to be expressive, have dreams, and to be successful; yet this can be difficult without a viable public transit option.
The search for a contemporary and unique re-lighting of the Nashville Parthenon created for our studio a special opportunity to compare and contrast the Greek Parthenon’s formal, structural, decorative properties and the role it played in the festive, civic and pedagogical cultural life of ancient Athens with that of the role that Nashville’s Parthenon plays in the history and contemporary cultural life of Nashville. There are great similarities and great differences. Both buildings share a great affection of the local populace. It is remarkable the effort undertaken by the citizens, civic leaders and the business communities of both cities to build, maintain and reconstruct their individual structures. Both structures were—and are—in dialogue
III – LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – 50’s / 60’s O God, refresh and gladden my spirit. Purify my heart. Illumine my powers. I lay all my affairs in Thy hand.
The Great Chicago Fire, was a catastrophic event that charred 3.3 square miles of Chicago. It slayed nearly 300 people and more than 100,000 citizens lost their homes. The fire destroyed 17,500 buildings and Chicago lost 200 million dollars (4 billion dollars in 2016 money). A burning hell raged upon Chicago from 9:00 pm, October 8th to early tuesday morning October 10th. It sent many people running for their lives, some crossed the river thinking it would save them; but the fire burned over the river because of the oils and pollutants in the water.
Known for its meat-packing industry and former gang problem, Chicago is a city that is rich in history. From the Pullman Historic District to the Biograph Theater, you can experience the wonder of Chicago first hand at these destinations. Top off your tour with a trip to a speakeasy-themed restaurant or a dinner theater for a more in-depth take on Chicago 's past. The Pullman Historic District
Americans were able to make thousands of dollars off of gold and immagrants and foreigners from all over the world came to California. Citizens became richer and all different cultures learned to
Orange County is a place which has a great influence on other parts of the country and even the world. It highlights the greatness of living in the United States, yet it doesn’t see how it shows the worst of American’s that live here. Orange County has the power to change the physical and cultural characteristics of other places around the world. Who knew that a little county in California could have such a huge impact on culture in other countries around the world? It is used as an example for many places in terms of architecture, fashion and lifestyle.
CHAPTER FIVE Discussion, Implications and Conclusion. 1.1. Introduction We can make our Riverfront with patience and persistence. People are recognizing that Riverfronts can bring new life to them and energy to their communities.
FREDERICK LAW OLMSTED AND CAMILLO SITTE: NOT AS DIFFERENT AS THEY FIRST APPEAR Harkening from different sides of the Atlantic, two influential urban planners worked to transform the blossoming urban environment of the nineteenth century, albeit with very different approaches. This essay will be looking at the ideals and some of the work of Frederick Law Olmsted and Camillo Sitte. Born within just over twenty years of one and other, Olmsted in Hartford, Connecticut, and Sitte in Vienna, both men had careers encompassing fields well beyond urban planning. Not a planner by training, Olmsted delved into the world of planning when he and Calvert Vaux won the design competition for New York’s Central Park in 1858.
Beginning in the late 19th century, the second industrial revolution irreversibly affected urban planning and the townscape starting with major industrial cities. Cities changed the way they functioned in order to adapt to the new requirements set by the revolution. There were several ways in which this rapid change affected urbanism, starting from the rapid growth of population, housing near working sites of factories, poor conditions of constructions and areas of high density of buildings. This effect can be described as rapid urbanization, which ultimately gave rise to suburbs and the decline of the inner city, which in turn became linear and polycentric (Roberts, 2015).