"A Pickpocket's Tale" by Timothy J. Gilfoyle is an absorbing tale that transports readers to the dark passageways and filthy corners of late-nineteenth-century New York City. The protagonist, George Appo, is a well-known pickpocket who became famous for his criminal exploits. Readers observe the brutal reality experienced by the urban poor and working-class during this era through Appo's eyes, as well as the extent they had to go to in order to sustain themselves. Readers are captivated as the novel continues by the ascent of Appo's criminal career and the innovative techniques he utilizes to outwit the authorities and rival gangs. However, beneath the action-packed plot, lies a deep exploration of the interplay between capitalism and crime, …show more content…
Gilfoyle's skillful weaving of historical analysis and narrative creates a book that not only entertains but also challenges readers to confront their preconceptions about the complex social dynamics of the "city that never sleeps".
Gilfoyle approaches the connection between capitalism and criminality in Gilded Age subcultures from an unusual perspective. According to Gilfoyle's Marxist viewpoint, the pickpockets were reacting to the economic conditions established by capitalism. As can be observed in Chapter 3, Gilfoyle explores the societal factors that encouraged pickpocketing to become a popular career choice throughout the Gilded Age. He observes that the United States' fast industrialization and urbanization during this time produced stark economic inequities, particularly among the poor. As noted by Gilfoyle, pickpocketing allowed some people to obtain goods and money that they otherwise would not have had, providing them a chance to survive in the current economic circumstances. According to the passage, "New York witnessed an explosion of new ameliorative institutions to remedy problems associated with homeless, abandoned, orphaned, and criminal youths" (Gilfoyle 41); the emergence of new
…show more content…
He uses a variety of sources, including police records, court transcripts, newspaper stories, and personal correspondence, to paint a complex and nuanced picture of the pickpocket subculture and its role in the greater social and economic backdrop of the time. Gilfoyle's use of primary sources, in particular, is outstanding, presenting personal narratives and facts that serve to explain pickpockets' experiences and the problems they encountered. For instance, he incorporates passages from George Appo's memoirs, which provide a distinctive perspective on a pickpocket's motivations and experiences, as well as anecdotes from other pickpockets and criminals of the era. One example of how capitalism's emphasis on individualism and self-interest an effect on the criminal justice system in New York City in the late 19th and early 20th centuries had is the phrase "I was anything but good, he sent me to State's Prison instead of the Penitentiary" (Gilfoyle 53). The comment is from a police officer's statement outlining his reasoning for choosing a state jail over a penitentiary for a specific pickpocket. The officer's choice was influenced less by the seriousness of the crime than by his opinion of the
Many people rather work than go to school to better themselves but drive to work is lost in recession and we can see a never-ending poverty cycle for many people. The public school system is also described as a subpar institution that often contributes to Harlem’s problems. Bullying and rapes play into street culture and subjugation of women. As you move into the inner city the author describes that traditional patriarchal lines are redrawn as women are becoming more independent. Many males use violence against women to try and keep
Off the Books Report In this book we see Sudhir Venkatesh as he dwells among the people of Maquis Park, a poor black neighborhood in the ghetto of Chicago. He comes to tell us about the black market economy that keeps this neighborhood alive; although mostly illegal, the mix of “licit and illicit” goods and services serves as a way of making a living for almost everyone in this neighborhood, ranging from prostitutes and drug-dealers to pastors and nannies. This economy is incredibly interesting to read about and observe through lens of Venkatesh. He could not stand idly by as a bystander as he took part in the community of these people and after years of being there he slowly became a person of interest in the neighborhood who was sought out
This memoir enables the reader to experience the work gangs put in to sell their product. By following and occasionally participating in Black King’s jobs, most directly with its leader J.T., Venkatesh searches for answers at the Robert Taylor Homes
Goetz shot the four men and became a known figure in New York for standing up against “dangerous criminals.” However, in the 1990s when Goetz went to trial court, New York’s crime rate had declined at a surprising rate and citizens viewed him as a murderer and racist for his actions on the subway. In “The Power of Context,” Gladwell expands into his own personal theories behind the city’s decline in crime. He brings attention to two hypotheses: the power of context and the broken-window hypothesis. The broken-window hypothesis was implemented by New York leaders in collaboration with the police department to take stricter action with minor crimes occurring in the city, such as graffiti and small burglaries.
“Gang Leader for a Day: A Rogue Sociologist Takes to the Streets” by Sudhir Venkatesh is a book that described the recollection of Venkatesh’s time with the Black Kings, a crack-dealing gang, in the Robert Taylor Homes. Venkatesh was a sociology student at the University of Chicago and began a project in which he conducted years of research in the urban poor of Chicago. He “ditched the questionnaire in favor of just spending time with his subjects…as he tried to learn about their lives on their terms, not his”. He wanted to discover how people, such as the crack-dealing gangs, tenant leaders, and cops in the projects buy, sell, and use drugs. Hierarchy and social structure was described in Venkatesh’s autobiography of what occurred in the Robert Taylor Homes.
In the late nineteenth century in America, crime became a big problem in urban societies. These crimes consisted of prostitution, assault, pickpocketing, murder, counterfeiting, grafting and much more. Timothy Gilfoyle claimed that crime in industrial cities was directly connected with those who have a lower social status and could not maintain a secure and stable life. After reading many primary and secondary sources from Gilfoyles book The Urban Underworld in Late Nineteenth-Century New York: The Autobiography of George Appo, I have come to agree with his statement. Although crime was and will never be acceptable, it was justifiable during this time.
The larger your pockets, the more power you have in society. Especially in the crime world, money allows high-status criminals to get away with their misdemeanours, “But in Sydney, money buys status and is the greatest equaliser.” The wealthy can buy everything, even relationships with “high-ranking police officers, judges and bookies”. Contrast with traditional crime fiction like ‘Sherlock Holmes’ society is with the protagonist. The story ends with mastermind detective Holmes solving the case and bringing justice to a righteous society while in Life and Crimes of Harry Lavender, Claudia lacks to serve justice because money and power have corrupted the society of Sydney.
Du Bois (2007) found that in the Seventh Ward in Philadelphia, only 2% of black men over 21 were in learned professions, such as teaching, while 45% were servants, and for women over 21, 37% were domestic servants and 27% were housewives and day labourers. In addition, black people were far more likely to lose their jobs through no fault of their own, and they would generally be paid lower wages (Du Bois, 2007). Black people also struggled with finding work as they often had few skills due to their history of enslavement, as well as the fact that there was more competition from an increasing number of immigrants (Du Bois, 2007). The problems that black Philadelphians faced with employment then caused serious poverty, with crime and pauperism of black people seeming to exceed that of white people, which was expected due to most black people being from a lower social class (Du Bois, 2007). This shows how the fact that most black Philadelphians could not find well paid, skilled work caused poverty which then led to further issues in their lives, including poor housing and poor health, illustrating how economic factors did have a significant impact on the lives of black
2. Living in a poor society in Harlem causes the gang to rob and steal money from music stores and mini marts. For an example, in the music store, the gang put song records in a newspaper and left the store without paying. They needed the
Like “Bartleby,” Johnson’s text interrogates the dehumanizing interpersonal dynamics that exist between a figure invested with established institutional authority and an individual trapped in an abject condition of enforced servitude. It is important, however, to recognize that while the lawyer’s position of dominance is largely limited to the financial and occupational sphereit is no coincidence, after all, that the narrative positions itself within the confines of Wall StreetMoses Green, in contrast, possesses virtually unlimited control over all aspects of his slave’s existence. The lawyer hires Bartleby, but Green buys Mingo, with “Mexican coin” (Johnson 3). Thus, although Green’s authority similarly arises from an exploitative system of property and human relationsthat is, the totalitarian system of Black slaverythe principles of ownership undergirding his slaveholding status render him not so much a master as a godlike figure of near-divine authority: Mingo is not just his slave, his chattel, but his artistic creation, a “rude chump of foreign clay” (Johnson 5) who owes not merely his material livelihood, but his very state of existence, to Moses
Tally’s Corner is the sociological interpretation of the culture of Negro streetcorner men. Elliot Liebow sets out to expose the hypocrisies that lead black men in this circumstance. The study is carried out in Washington D.C. The key argument posed by Liebow is that black males are incapable of attaining jobs because they lack education. He also argues that this is a cycle that inevitably results in a trans-generational marginalization of the black race.
”(Reiman, 2010, p.5) This means that by creating an image that our system is trying to fight crime, but at the same time allowing certain crimes to exist and scare society, it benefits the wealthy in several ways. First, it promotes that the wealthy population is
He speaks about the story of Clyde Ross, a black man who fled horrible conditions in Mississippi to find work in Chicago. Like many Americans Ross dreamed of owning a home. However, the only way for a black person to buy a home in Chicago in the mid-twentieth century was to buy from predatory “contract” sellers who charged unbillable rates with few legal protections for buyers. Clyde said “To keep up with his payments and keep his heat on, I took a second job at the post office and then a third job delivering pizza.” Like many blacks in Chicago at the time he got two jobs just to keep up with the payments of the house, overall being kept away from his
His father had a business and received good income, making $5,000 a month. Often obtaining 5 to 6 jobs in total monthly. Their family is a prime example of how a mixed economy that is part capitalist can be damaging to someone 's livelihood. Quinney (1980, p. 1) claims that “the study of crime involves an investigation of such natural products and contradictions of capitalism as alienation, inequality, poverty, unemployment, spiritual
Markus Zusak has assembled ‘The Book Thief’ using a variety of narrative conventions. These include a unique narrative viewpoint, plot structure and use of imagery, all of which provide meaning to the reader. (33 words) A narrative’s point of view refers to who is telling the story. In this case Zusak’s narrator identifies himself as Death.