On the tenth year anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights activists, published an article about violence and nonviolence. The speaker in this article, Cesar Chavez, addresses the citizens of every country. The purpose for Chavez to write this is to show the reader how nonviolence and violence can lead to many different outcomes. The subject of this piece is civil rights. Throughout his article Chavez develops his argument of nonviolent protests by using logos, allusions, and tone.
Throughout his article Chavez establishes logos because he wants the reader to reach a logical decision. He believes the reader must know the consequence of each decision in order to make the right choice. Chavez says, “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated...or there will be total demoralization of the workers”, in order to show the reader how violence has worse consequences than nonviolence. In order to further convey his message, Chavez says “...with nonviolence, we attract people’s
…show more content…
This passionate tone helps the reader infer Chavez strongly believes in his cause. He repeats of words such as “supports” and “powerful” to show the reader the effect of nonviolence on a person and a community. His appeals to justice make the article relatable to everyone because at a point in one’s life, one has been treated unjustly. Many of the claims presented help provide a connection between the reader and the author. An example of this can be “When victory comes through violence, it it a victory with strings attached”, which shows how violent revolts have many more consequences, which can include death. The use of a passionate tone helps to strengthen Chavez’s argument by allowing him to express powerful words and feelings while also including a relatable experience for
The reading " The forgotten victim from Florence and Normandie " written by Steve Lopez has good points being said that, I agree with them . The main points I connect with was made by Fidel Lopez is and how he was unfortunate to be brutally beat in the L.A. Riots but he encouraged his family to move forward to better . Fidel Lopez's idea that nobody should be treated differently by how they appear is meaningful to me because everybody isn't always accepted equally. He didn't want the leader of the L.A. Riots to be punished too harsh because he grew from the experience he got. This shows that Fidel stood strong from the attack and while telling his story over to Steve Lopez.
Yglesias portrays the main message through interactions, while Chavez is very direct. This contrast is evident of Yglesias’s superior education and writing
Cesar uses historical information in order to present a scenario where the use of non-violence successfully worked in Gandhi’s protest. Chavez further elaborates upon his success by stating “The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” Chavez appeals to his audience’s reason by examining how Gandhi's nonviolent protest lead to his movements increased numbers and how it was “allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” he uses this appeal in order to reason with hi people that nonviolence will increase the success of their protest by increasing their
The 60's was the height of the Civil Rights Movement in America, and Dr. Martin Luther King was one of the most prominent leaders of the movement. The philosophy of fighting back against oppression through nonviolent protest, something that was soon adapted by many different activists for different causes at this time once it began to be proved effective. Cesar Chavez writes this article in remembrance of Dr. King, as well as to gain the support of many Christians to his protest of the treatment of many Mexicans migrants in America. In his article Cesar Chavez uses rhetorical devices such as compare and contrast, ethos, and references to pursue his religious audience that nonviolent protest will help get the best outcome as oppose to violence. Chavez uses contrast to convince his audience that supporting his cause is the right thing to do by stating the outcome of nonviolence as opposed to violence many times throughout the article.
A decade later after Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination, Cesar Chavez published an article to help those people fight for civil rights and those in need of help. This disaster affected many people’s heart that were fighting during the Civil Rights Movement and those that were also helping the people in need of help. Chavez uses emotional appeal,diction,and repetition supports his article in helping those involved in civil rights. Chavez appeals to pathos to express the torment that the lower class is dealing with like the farmers and the workers that do not earn much money. He describes that violence is making the large percentage of people feeling “ frustration,impatience,and anger which seethe inside every farm worker.”
In the speech Chavez says, “We are also convinced that nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” He then goes on to say that violence causes deaths and demoralizes the people, while nonviolence attracts people’s support and is morally just. The use of juxtaposition as a rhetorical device throughout the whole speech shows the pros of nonviolence and the cons of violence. This technique helps Chavez develop his argument because it creates a favorable bias
(Chavez 1) His nonviolent approach to difficulties still have a huge aftermath in our world and change it for the better. The author really emphasizes the trueness of King’s character and his example to our struggling lives to make a better world. Additionally, Chavez uses emotion to change the readers view to the capability nonviolence has. For example, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct
The two allusions to historical figures develop Chavez’s argument as they remind him and the audience of how large of an impact nonviolence had on the world in the past and how it could be applied to the
Chavez begins his argument by saying that a human life is an irreplaceable “possession given by God”. By resorting to violence, it has the grim possibility of being taken away. Chavez further expands his use of ethos by providing examples of ethics and morals. Nonviolence gathers support for moral causes, whereas unethical actions create discouragement among followers. Violence is merely the result
Cesar Chavez wrote a piece in the magazine of religious organization on the ten year anniversary of Martin Luther King. He starts off saying that Dr. King was a very powerful man with nonviolent means. Throughout his writing he gives many example of why nonviolence will ultimately succeed over violent means, and give of many appeals of emotional, logical, creditable justification. Dr. King may have dies, but with his death only more power has come to the peaceful citizens of the world.
In order to achieve true freedom one must discover that you can break unjust laws through peaceful protest. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and “The Speech at The March Washington” by Josephine Baker each article passionately argues about the disadvantages of the black community, the equality and power of education. We must learn to act with patients and not guns we must protect are self’s with a pen and paper not violence. Dr. King once4 said “Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. It is unique in history which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it.
“The greater the oppression, the more leverage nonviolence holds. Violence does not work in the long run and if it is temporarily successful, it replaces one violent form of power with another just as violent.” -Cesar Chavez “He Showed Us the Way” (Lines 73-77). Chavez employs ethos and logos to help solidify his point, which ultimately helps him forge a convincing argument.
In his speech, the President strongly expresses his attitude towards the nation’s current immigration status and the need for change. Obama is able to connect with his audience through three dimensions: ethical, logic and emotion which is also known as ethos, pathos and logo. Through these forms of rhetorical arguments, President Obama widens the range of his audience, both liberal and conservative. The President explains the rights and wrongs of the current immigration system that is in this country. His use of words provide situations, which applies to the majority of Americans.
It is through these lines that Martí shows his appreciation for Cuba’s beauty, while acknowledging its struggle and hinting at a hopeful future. It is later in the poem, in the last stanza, where Martí uses his typical blend of defiance, empathy for the oppressed, and
The reason for this is because definitions of civil disobedience is important in determining the legitimacy of these protests. The main issue with defining civil disobedience is that there are major fault lines by many theorists about what constitutes civil disobedience, and more important what does not (Milligan, 2013: 13). John Rawls famous described civil disobedience as a “Public, nonviolent, conscience, yet political act contrary to law.” (Rawl, 1970: 104). The major sticking point in this definition of civil-disobedience comes from the inclusion of “nonviolence”, and while this essay will touch on the definition of violence itself, it is important to note this point of tension.