A Rhetorical Analysis Of Bush And Blair's Speech

841 Words4 Pages
A tragedy is an event that is horrific and often can be never be healed. However, with the presence of the correct type of leadership, a tragedy can progressively produce a better world for mankind. For example, the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington D.C. were horrific tragedies. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, world leaders, such as President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair, produced speeches that motivated people to prevail over tragedy and instead take the opportunity to make a greater and more prosperous future for the world. President Bush and Prime Minister Blair also had to use their speeches to turn the world from terrorism to a more positive course. To achieve this goal, both Bush and Blair had to employ tone and rhetorical strategies in order to appeal to their audiences. The tone of a piece of writing is often seen as the attitude the author has towards a particular subject or audience, and it is shown through the diction or viewpoint of the writer on a particular subject. It can affect different people in varying ways like making people feel sad or devastated. The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, were some of the most devastating events that have ever taken place on United States soil. Portrayed through their speeches, the tone of President Bush’s speech, to Congress, and Prime Minister Blair’s speech, to…show more content…
On the other hand, tragedies can eventually create a better world for all mankind. The terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, were some of the worst attacks in history. At the same time, both President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair wrote a speech that motivated people to change the world for the greater good. They were able to turn a negative tragedy into a very powerful outlook on the future. Bush and Blair achieved their goals through the use of tone and rhetorical
Open Document