In “Lead Poisoning,” hosted by John Oliver, of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, a comedian, who brings to light many dangerous and controversial issue. His targeted audience are mainly socially and politically liberal Americans concerned about cultural, economic and prominent social issues. In this essay, Oliver appeals to his audience by using humorous tones, diction and fallacies. He presents his argument in forms of factual data and some statistics generated by TV broadcast, lawmakers, psychologist, and government agencies to build his credibility and trustworthiness with his audience. Although, how Oliver presents his argument doesn’t appeal to every audience for instance, a scholar audience. In order, for a scholar audience to adhere …show more content…
For example, throughout his broadcast, Oliver gets overly excited and uses profanity words like “hell…fuck”. He uses ambiguous language such as, “if we were signing personality traits to metal.” Also, Oliver presents his audience with numerous fallacy for instance, the Led Zeppelin. His audience appeals to this format because throughout Oliver’s broadcast, they continue to laugh when in fact, lead poisoning is no laughing matter however, I do believe that Oliver made his point that we have a problem and it’s lead poisoning which, inadvertently, is affecting children today. Therefore, every kind of audience would want to know about lead poisoning and its effect on everyone. However, a scholar audience, professors and professionals, would want to know more detailed …show more content…
For instance, a scholar would want to know where the 2,000 contaminated pipes across the U.S. are and how we can stop the contamination of lead pipes. A scholar audience would accept the lawmakers’ sadness over lead found in children however, a scholar would want to know why they’re not lobbing for more funding to prevent lead poisoning and how are they going to solve this issue. A scholar audience would frown upon the misleading information and faulty logic that Elizabeth Mc Dade presented in Oliver’s broadcast because we all know that water in surrounding areas come from the same water district and how can children in Flint have contaminated water at home and not at school. Therefore, a scholar audience would want more information on the where the school receives their water from because as it stands, Mc Dade is presenting misleading information. Also, this audience would want to know how lead affects adults. Most scholar audiences would not adhere to any type of fallacies because the information would be irrelevant to lead poisoning. For instance, Led Zeppelin has nothing to do with lead
This sentence I find very odd and slightly sad. It speaks of a torturing a raccoon by offering it a sugar cube. The author then explains that raccoons are very particular about cleaning their food before they have eaten it. I find this ironic because my first association of raccoons would be of them eating scraps from human trash cans. Even though they go through the trouble of cleaning their food essentially they are still eating waste and trash that humans disposed.
Rhetorical Appeals in the Wounded Warrior Project Advertisements The Wounded Warrior Project recruits the aid of the American public to honor and assist injured veterans of the United States armed forces. Through financial aid, the non-profit organization provides programs for the physical and mental injuries of soldiers with little or no cost to the warriors. The organization also offers support services for the warrior’s family (www.woundedwarriorproject.org). Through advertisements, the Wounded Warrior Project hopes to gain the public’s aid to finance the organization’s programs.
Wilson’s use of satire and other rhetorical devices effectively exposes the immature nature of the arguments between these two groups as well as demonstrate how counterproductive they can be. Wilson’s format is the first striking thing the reader notices. Both passages have the same general structure: They both begin by discrediting the other group, they both claim their group is entirely irreproachable, and they conclude by briefly establishing their own goals and ideas. This not only proves how similar the strategies are, but also establishes the immature and ineffective nature of these arguments.
Minimum wage has always been a difficult topic to talk about in political situations with questions about increasing or decreasing it forever on the ballot. In today’s economic state there has been an increase of the minimum wage in several states such as California; which has caused a debate on the national level of how much the lower class can live on. In Barbara Ehrenreich’s book she tries out low wage living and documents it in Nickel and Dimed, in her opinion it's barely possible to survive on low wages for even one person. To show this she employs conversational and concrete diction to show the difficulties of living two lives that are at different poles of the economic scale and the ignorance of both classes to those besides themselves with a confusion of audiences.
No Nickels or Dimes To Spare In the book, Nickel and Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich writes the story, “Serving in Florida.” She describes her experience living as an undercover waitress when in reality she’s a journalist for culture and politics with a doctorate in biology. Ehrenreich experiences trying to survive on multiple low income jobs to understand what it is like to be in their shoes instead of being apart of the higher middle class.
In The Outrage Industry, Berry and Sobieraj argue that the topic of media outrage is very multidimensional. Outrage is defined as avstrong reaction with anger, shock, or rage. In the political context, this could be how citizens react to a speech a politician has made, commentary between politicians aired on television, and or commentary between political journalists. America loves sensationalism. When the media broadcasts negatively charged reactions between political journalists or politicians, their ratings go up.
The Braindead Megaphone written by George Saunders analyzes the many negative effects that nowaday news media has on society. He begins by illustrating a scene in which a man disrupts a party and drowns out all voices with a megaphone. Now this imagery is a metaphor in which the megaphone represents the news media such as newspaper, television, radio, and of course the internet. As Saunders narration continues the people at the party soon begin to respond to whatever the man with the megaphone says and even starts to mimic things he does and say. In fact it does not matter what he says as long as the megaphone is in his hand.
By saying that the media is at fault for not anticipating the pre-9/11 threat he, Tom Fenton, believes that the media should be taken very seriously and are “in charge” of picking up clues from the people and places they are reporting on. Since Zinser uses this he is using Tom Fenton’s emotions on the subject to get the reader’s attention. This article used ethical appeal, logical appeal, and emotional appeal to grab the audience’s attention. As a whole, logical appeal was used predominantly, and emotional appeal used . Using the emotional appeal more than logical appeal in this type of article would have
Pitts Article Rhetorical Analysis – Final Draft In life people try to comfort others in times of grieving. Leonard Pitts comforts his readers in his article, “We will go forward from this moment ” by trying to make since of the 9/11 attack. Pitts uses emotion and logic to persuade the Americans that the terrorists can do what they want to America, but America is tough enough to handle it.
Rhetoric is defined as the art of persuasion using oral or written communications (Rapp). There are many theories and ideas which an orator or writer can use as tools to achieve their goal of persuading an audience. The audience is defined in rhetoric as “the listeners or spectators at a speech or performance, or the intended readership for a piece of writing or an assembled and pointed group of listeners that receive the message of the rhetor and ultimately decide the message’s effectiveness” (Enos). Within the study of rhetoric the focus is on what the speaker or writer does to create the affect and response they want from their audience; in this essay I will describe the audience and their role in the communications throughout
For instance, he encourages his audience to think within the quote, “Are we demanding enough of our television news presentations? And are the men of this medium demanding enough of themselves?”(Agnew) He knew that even though his audience wouldn’t say their answers aloud, it would stir thoughts within them and keep them engaged. He also asks the questions, “Now what do Americans know of the men who wield this power?” and, “Is it not fair and relevant to question its concentration in the hands of a tiny, enclosed fraternity of privileged men elected by no one and enjoying a monopoly sanctioned and licensed by Government?”(Agnew)
In conclusion, Dana Gioia applies vocabulary and rhetorical appeals to actively influence his audience to agree to his argument. Furthermore, connecting his audience to the subject and inspiring them to help his issues and understand his
Likewise, this example can appeal to some public as it advocates proper conversational care. In terms of concerns, not only does Carson care effectively about the use of pesticides and chemicals among
It has been shown that using certain appeals in writings, especially on subjects that already give an especially large emotional reaction, makes opinions sound reasonable and sensible. For example, on a subject such as amnesty for illegal immigrants, it is easy to see the emotional appeal that one could use to weave a sneaky opinion into their article. In the article “Amnesty? Let Us Be Vigilant and Charitable”, John Kavanaugh, who created the article in 2008, decides to use a large amount of emotional appeal in his article on the subject of Amnesty. In contrast, the article “Dream On”, by Mark Krikorian, written in 2010 arguably does the exact opposite of emotional appeal, logical appeal. It is clear of his word choice that he is opposed to bad amnesty laws in general.
Neil Postman in Chapter 1 of "Amusing Ourselves to Death" aims to show how the television can manipulate a person 's decision in politics, religion, education and turn those into entertainment. Even today Postman’s ideeas stand strong and it is true that if an information is entertaining the viewer will not look at the autenticity or what the origins of it are. Probably as expected, the more the technology advances, the more the manipulation from the television is taking place. This is done by: changing how people think, making their brain numb by not allowing them to have an opinion and interfering in their family life and in people decision-making process. The only way to save ouselves from living under the control of the television is simply