David Leonhardt, an American journalist and columnist, wrote an article published by New York Times, “Make Colleges Diverse,” on the need to enroll more working-class students at elite universities. Universities have implemented a different racial and ethnic student body, but lacked the acceptance of students with low financial status. The financial burden from colleges has discouraged students from achieving their goals at Ivy League schools. David Leonhardt mentions that universities should work with the middle class students of all races. Overall, he uses rhetorical questions, stylistic language, and an informal tone to emphasize the need for colleges to be more diverse starting with the financial status of each person.
Leonhardt utilizes
…show more content…
The universities must be filled with talented and well-educated people in the United States. In order to achieve a more diverse environment, Bloomberg’s foundation, the American Talent Initiative, instills a goal: to increase the number of Pell Grant recipients attending college within ten years. Michael Bloomberg creates a coalition of colleges including private and public colleges to commit to being more diverse. Moreover, Jeffrey Valdespino Leal, a Stanford freshman, is an exemplar of a low-income student intermixing with the elite university students. Jeffrey Valdespino’s experience shows people that the middle class can achieve success at an Ivy League school. Overall, Leonhardt urges colleges to enroll more working-class students to increase the diversity at …show more content…
His article spoke a powerful truth that millions of Americans must be aware of. I agree with his call for more working-class students of all races at elite universities. The opening lines of the article where he mentions that most qualified low-income student do not attend Ivy League schools are upsetting since their financial status acts as a negative component to their college application. The privileged point of view of trustees and administrator present serious obstacles to these intentions ever manifesting into reality. The fantasy that all young people are running the same race blinds many university trustees and administrators to the reality that they undervalue students who always have to run uphill. There is no relationship between being intelligent and inheriting wealth. Therefore, the “poor” smart students have the ability to master skills at Ivy League schools. On the other hand, Leonhardt describes local colleges as “an injustice.” The term “injustice” is a negative connotation to local colleges which instills the same education and easier accessibility to students. Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, is a prime example of someone who did not attend an elite university, but still became successful working with software. In order to establish a more united country, we must start with unifying universities and allowing middle-class
Recently, many have begun to attack and degrade higher education in the United States. In the book How College Works, authors Daniel Chambliss and Christopher Takacs claim, “As state support has eroded, and as more students attend college in an increasingly desperate attempt to find viable jobs, the price to students of attending an institution of higher education has gone up, especially at more selective institutions” (172). So is college even worth it? Caroline Bird’s excerpt from her book Case Against College “Where College Fails Us” is an adequately written article that agrees with those who question whether college is a good investment. Bird argues that although some students would benefit from college and succeed, many fall short, wasting
One of the most strived for things in life is academic excellence however the path to it is never easy. Author Thompson Ford’s article “How To Understand Acting White” outlines Stuart Bucks arguments about the irony of desegregation in education. A separate essay written by, Alfred Lubrano, “The Shock of Education: How College Corrupts” has similar ironies about the average college student. If Ford was to read Lubrano’s essay, Ford would come to a more complex conclusion by incorporating arguments and concepts from Lubrano’s essay. Ford may utilize Lubrano’s essay to expand on certain concepts such as the proximity effect, socioeconomics, and the level of education in top tier schools to further explain the “acting white” phenomenon from his own article.
She states, “The reason for the more overall positive experience for Black students attending HBCUs than those attending PWIs can closely be linked to the unique institutional climate that HBCUs provide for students of color.” She talks about how HBCUs foster a “more encouraging and understanding for Black students” (Biehlmann) because of the higher percentage of Black faculty and administrators as role models. Biehlmann highlights how the presence of Black professors and administrators creates a setting that is in tune with the “specific knowledge of the Black experience in America,” (Biehlmann). Also, Blacks are the majority at HBCUs which can help them feel more comfortable and involved in their classes and campus. Whereas if a Black student attended a PWI, the student would feel alienated and disconnected from faculty, their White peers, and the campus
Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) are institutions of higher education in the United States founded primarily for the education of African Americans. Prior to the mid-1960s, HBCUs were virtually the only institutions open to African Americans due to the vast majority of predominantly white institutions prohibiting qualified African Americans from acceptance during the time of segregation. As such, they are institutional products of an era of discrimination and socially constructed racism against African Americans (Joseph, 2013). Successfully, millions of students have been educated in spite of limited resources, public contempt, accreditation violations, and legislative issues. The purpose of this research paper is to discuss
The debate over the dominance between a PWI and HBCU is a preeminent conversation that is a necessity to be resolved. The false accusations about the various colleges arise when an African-American PWI student believes that they have better chances to acquire a career or obtain more knowledge compared to that of an African-American HBCU attendee. Consequently, this may result in an HBCU student to respond in saying that PWIs don’t experience the same cultural diversity that HBCUs have toshould offer for their students, inducing that those scholars lose the connection with African-American culture and race. However, is this truly the case? Although this may be portrayed as a situation that is directed toward blacks, the debate should be one
A few decades ago, African-Americans weren’t able to participate college basketball due to racial tensions amongst blacks and whites and to Jim Crow Laws. Many programs at the collegiate level blocked this from happening on multiple occasions until in 1949, when they lifted the ban and allowed integration. By lifting the ban, this allowed inclusion that ushered in whites to compete against blacks. However, some schools still refused to compete because they were hesitant and continued to stereotype. Over time, integration was evident but it didn’t take place in major programs and blue blood schools, such as Duke, North Carolina, Kentucky and Kansas until the 70s.
However, impoverished students are constantly being deprived of a college diploma as their wealthy peers continue with their postsecondary degree. “The Diploma Divide” was able to effectively showcase the discrepancy among students with varying economic status. With the use of emotional appeals, a dispirited tone, and a genre with high prestige, “The Diploma Divide” could possibly bridge the gap between people with different socioeconomic status so that a college education can be accessible to all. After all, America is a place of endless opportunities, so why don’t we grant equal
The author of this essay, Marty Nemko, has worked in both career and educational counseling, as well as writing as a columnist. His has firsthand experience with not only university presidents, but also a wide range of the students. Knowing he’s worked with the area he is writing about, may led some credibility to his ethos. However, he may have a personal stake in writing this piece because he has written several books concerning educational psychology and its related issues. He even directly says in this essay “…data I used for my book, How to Get an Ivy League Education at a State University.”
1a:“College is a singular opportunity to rummage through and luxuriate in ideas, to give your brain a vigorous workout and your soul a thorough investigation, to realize how very large the world is and to contemplate your desired place in it. And that’s being lost in the admissions mania, which sends the message that college is a sanctum to be breached — a border to be crossed — rather than a land to be inhabited and tilled for all that it’s worth. ”(Bruni 10) 1b: This passage, which is included in the final pages of Bruni’s introduction, helps define both his thoughts on the purpose of college and, at the same time, why he believes the rapidly increasing focus on college admissions is a problem.
Brent Staple’s essay "Why Colleges Shower Their Students with A's" had various elements that helped provided evidence and persuade the readers. The first thing I noticed when reading this essay was the comparison between the marketplace and college. This comparison helps to develop Staple’s argument because it explains something that is unfamiliar by comparing it to something that is more familiar. I can assume that the target readers were business men and women. Since I am unfamiliar with some business terms, I found that this essay explained something that was unfamiliar with something else that was unfamiliar.
“College in America” Caroline Bird thinks that a college education may not be the best choice for all high school students because college education does not bring about social equality, it does not benefit them financially, and it is not guaranteed that college will lead them to an elite profession. First of all, high school students are expected to bring about social equality through four rigorous years in college. However, college is an expensive way to categorize the highs and lows in society. It is pressuring to younger students to pursue a higher education that only a few could achieve, and is also difficult for them to established an identity in society. Second, a college education does not benefit the youth financially because it is
“Eat the rich,” the phrase so famously created by the French revolutionary and writer Jean-Jacques Rousseau, is possibly ringing in the thoughts of lower-income students and their families’ minds in the face of rising tuition costs with the seemingly endless problems of Higher Education. However, the phrase can easily be the title of one of the many proposals; the student debt crisis had not only affected the community consisting of college students and their families, but all sectors of society. There have been voices regarding this issue from different personalities, different occupations, and different roles in policy making; from the articles in the New York Times to voices from political commentary such as Ann Larson. Even billionaires
Delgado and Stefancic (2011) stated that Critical Race Theory explores how “race, racism, and power intersect to create different circumstances for people of color within society [...] and in postsecondary institutions” (as cited in Quaye, 2013, p. 172). Within the field of higher education, it is important for student affairs professionals to recognize how race permeates all aspects of an individual’s life to fully understand their students’ experiences. Unlike other student development theories, such as Baxter-Magolda’s (2008) self-authorship and Abes, Jones, and McEwen’s (2007) Model of Multiple Identities, CRT places race at the “center of the analysis and assumes that race is omnipresent” in an individual’s life (Quaye, 2013, p. 167).
After college, students entering the workforce will have no ties to the other social classes and may remain segregated. When colleges put different price tags on different rooms, students self-segregate unintentionally, allowing for the gap between social classes to broaden and adding to the segregation within the United
“3 Reasons College Still Matters” by Andrew Delbanco 3) “Surely, every American college ought to defend this waning possibility, whatever we call it. And an American college is only true to itself when it opens its doors to all - the rich, the middle, and the poor - who have the capacity to embrace the precious chance to think and reflect before life engulfs them. If we are all serious about democracy, that means everyone.” 4) In this part of the writing Andrew Delbanco tries to persuade his audience by using the pattern of logic that agrees with the overall argument but also considers another striking point of view to strengthen the argument (While these arguments are convincing, they must also consider…).