ipl-logo

A Rhetorical Analysis Of On Bullshit By Renan Levine

2022 Words9 Pages

Renan Levine has written an article on how to identify lies, bullshit, and knowledge. The article mainly talks about of arguments between persons which can be falsely or even contain bullshit. The author is trying to show the difference between lies and bullshit. Bullshit can refer to talking nonsense which most of the times is entails of lies while lies are just false statements about a particular object or person. Most liars and bullshitters believe that they are telling the truth and most of them always want to get away with that fact. However there is a big difference between liars and bullshitters since liars commonly know the truth but typically want to hide it while bullshitters they just don't care about the fact ("On Bullshit by …show more content…

Arguments are supposed to be logical and should have some basis for accepting the truth. The author has stated how an argument should be evaluated mainly by looking at the truthfulness of the area of the argument, the strength of the argument and how vital is that truth. Moreover there various words that both friends and enemies use to state liars and bullshitting and these words can sometimes not be noticed in an argument. That is because the parties involved in an argument may play around with words making it difficult for the other side to discern any …show more content…

Daniel, the writer of this article, has written a letter to the New York Times asking Friedman to give a sabbatical break from publishing his column because all that he is sating is just false. It seems that Daniel must have collected his facts through frequent reading of the New York Times and doing his research about the topics Thomas usually discusses.
As stated earlier, data analysis can be carried out in different ways.The collected data can be analyzed by jotting down the facts and compare them with what Thomas typically states in his articles. The writer has researched and given solutions of the possible advice that can be given to Iran meaning that he did his research efficiently. Daniel may have used the measure of central tendency to know how often Thomas had been stating facts that can cause a foreign crisis. Measure of central tendency (or statistical average) tells us the point about which items a
The tendency to cluster. Such an action is considered as the most representative figure for the entire mass of

Show More
Related

  • Tim O Brien Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    586 Words  | 3 Pages

    As Tim O'Brien discusses Curt Lemon's death, he effectively highlights the underlying paradoxes of a war story's truths by telling the same story in three accounts that each differ in diction, mood, tone, and sometimes imagery. For example, in the first paragraph, O'Brien utilizes a neutral, objective tone as he briefly lists the events before, during, and after Lemon's death. How so? O'Brien implicates his staunch neutrality in the middle of the first paragraph, where he nonchalantly recants, "He [Curt Lemon] was playing catch with Rat Kiley, laughing, and then he was dead." Here O'Brien seems to be playing with the audience's emotions, as he intentionally uses phrases such as "playing catch" and "laughing" to indicate vibrancy and child-like

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Leah Hager Cohen

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through the implementation of various rhetorical strategies, sensory imagery, and eloquent phrasing, Leah Hager Cohen effectively depicts the predominant idea that despite the stereotypical assumption that the audibly impaired cannot possibly be normal, her grandpa is, indeed, quite normal. The author employs vivid sensory imagery strategically throughout the essay. By strategically, she applies the images meticulously in order to fortify her ideas. She writes, “He smacked his lips and sucked his teeth…” (2, 5-6).

    Read More

  • Chris Britt's Rhetorical Analysis

    287 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his untitled gun control and gun rights cartoon, Chris Britt establishes an accusatory tone using critical irony and a macabre diction to condemn the national threat disregarded by the Republican Party for ignorantly advocating unregulated licensing of guns. Chris Britt evidently displays, in his work, a frustrated sentiment towards the American federal government, specifically addressing the Republican Party. Deliberately, Chris Britt labeled the gun store as “GOP Guns and Gore” and highlighting that the store is “Open 24-7”. Bluntly, Britt specified “GOP” (“Grand Old Party”), interchangeably corresponding to the Republican Party, to emphasize his personal disdain against their party platform. Indisputably, through irony, Chris Britt exhibits

    Read More

  • Summary Of Shawn Achor

    1199 Words  | 5 Pages

    Shawn Achor, psychological researcher, speaker, author and CEO of GoodThinkInc., an American organization which offers services and seminars to promote improved work performance through positive psychology. Achor argues in his February, 2011 presentation at a TEDx event in Bloomington, Indiana, that changing the formula of success and choosing to live in a world where happiness inspires productivity can be achieved by retraining your brain to be more positive over the course of 21-days. The content of Achor’s speech claimed that we are wired to believe happiness comes only after we have achieved success in the form of thoughts like "I'll be happy when I finish school", or "I'll be happy when I find a job." He states the formula we are all

    Read More

  • Kareem's Argument Analysis: Religion Has Nothing To Do With Terrorism

    578 Words  | 3 Pages

    Religion has Nothing to do with Terrorism Due to the many terrorism attacks happening in America Kareem Abdul- Jabbar decided to write an argument where he says why Islam religion has nothing to do with these attacks. However, Kareem’s argument is missing some of the rhetorical strategies. Mostly, he uses logos in his argument such as the terrorist attacks, and the attack in Paris. He tries to persuade the public to believe him, however he fails to do so due to lack of evidence.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Ted Talk

    1231 Words  | 5 Pages

    Do Not Let Your Experience Claim You The speaker of the Ted Talk, “Yes, I survived cancer. But that doesn 't define me” is Debra Jarvis. Debra Jarvis has been a hospice and hospital chaplain for 30 years.

    Read More

  • The Blind Side Rhetorical Analysis

    2057 Words  | 9 Pages

    “Honey, you are changing that boy’s life.” A friend of Leigh Anne’s exclaimed. Leigh Anne grinned and said, “No, he’s changing mine.” This exchange of words comes from the film trailer of an award-winning film, The Blind Side, directed by John Lee Hancock, released on November 20th, 2009. This film puts emphasis on a homeless, black teen, Michael Oher, who has had no stability or support in his life thus far.

    Read More

  • Mike Rose Rhetorical Analysis

    670 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis of Mike Rose Emotional, ethical, and logical appeals are all methods used in writing to perused you one way or another on various topics. Mike Rose used all of these techniques in this essay, to show how student who are pushed aside, distracted, or fall behind and fail. In this essay Rose describes that students who have teachers who are unprepared, or incompetent majorly contribute to student failure. He is trying to show that many children have potential that is overlooked or sometimes even ignored, by authority.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: The Ways We Lie By Stephanie Ericsson

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Most people tend to believe that lying is a way of life, that without it the whole world could crumble and fall. While some tend to believe that any form of lying is a sin and there should be consequences. One author, Stephanie Ericsson, wrote “The Ways We Lie” published in 1993 she talks about how we all lie, it has become an everyday chore to make life easier. She begins by trying to strengthen the bond between the reader and writer showing how they are one of the same. She does this by referencing past experiences, adding informed opinions, and using quotes from other well acknowledged authors, her argument is strong throughout the whole article that lying isn’t just evil, it can be used for good when used the right way.

    Read More

  • Deconstructing America Rhetorical Analysis

    1146 Words  | 5 Pages

    The ability for people to look at a situation from a different perspective is vital in today’s globalized society. Diversity is the most important, core attribute we each share that gives us the ability to assess new situations through our diverse backgrounds and upbringings. Unlike Patrick J. Buchanan’s argument in his essay titled “Deconstructing America,” diversity is a necessity in America’s culture as opposed to the burden it is described as. Conversely, Fredrickson 's essay titled “Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective,” illustrated a more precise version of American history that disproves Buchanan’s ethnocentric ideologies. Buchanan speaks of diversity on a narrow, one-way street.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Adam Savage's Why We Make '

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adam Savage expressed his speech titled "Why We Make" in the pursuit to fathom the reason why makers operate the way they do, and kickoff by expressing his first concoction — a Millennium Falcon he constructed in his mother's closet when he was a youngster. Savage continues to talk about the deceptive dichotomy between pop culture and culture, and how instructors and business professionals shouldn't delineate between reinvigorating the objects of myth and establishing something new. He anticipates a current generation of minorities will be stimulated to invent whatever it is they find intriguing, and points out that science, math, and art are all imperative ingredients for visionary work.

    Read More

  • Roger Ebert The Essential Man Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    460 Words  | 2 Pages

    Most people say life is extremely valuable and every day is a gift. Personally, I did not believe life was very valuable until I was medicated. With my mental illnesses every day of my life is a struggle, and I have to take medications to have normal brain functions like most people. Before I started taking Zoloft I thought it would be a magic pill that would immediately cure me and make me happy. The first few weeks I honestly thought I was dying, but I believed my doctors when they said the benefits would outweigh the side effects.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Mike Rowe

    618 Words  | 3 Pages

    In "Mike Rowe: Learning from Dirty Jobs." The speaker, Mike Rowe, is the host of a television series that looks into the lives of Americans who are said to have undesirable jobs. He begins the speech with a narrative about his experience in the Rocky Mountains, and how he was supposed to castrate a lamb. He continues by describing the scenario, and how he expected the process to be done as according to the humane society.

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Rhetorical Analysis

    1051 Words  | 5 Pages

    In a future totalitarian society, all books have been outlawed by the government, fearing an independent-thinking public. Fahrenheit 451 is a futuristic novel, telling the story of a time where books and independent thinking are outlawed. In a time so unenlightened, where those who want to better themselves by thinking, are outlawed and killed. Guy Montag is a senior firefighter who is much respected by his superiors and is in line for a promotion. He does not question what he does or why he does it until he meets Clarisse.

    Read More

  • Malcolm Gladwell Small Change Rhetorical Analysis

    1396 Words  | 6 Pages

    He uses statistics to make his article logical, while projecting given evidence to his point. She gives statistics like when she states “Seventy thousand students eventually took part” (Gladwell, 2010, paragraph 6) and uses scholarly references. Scholarly references are a type of reference written by professionals who are experts on the field. She gives scholarly references such as Stanford Sociologist Doug McAdam (Gladwell, 2010, paragraph 12), sociologist Mark Granovetter (Gladwell, 2010, paragraph 16), he uses these sociologist because he wants to give to her article an objective view even though he does not accomplish this.

    Read More

More about A Rhetorical Analysis Of On Bullshit By Renan Levine

Open Document