Rhetorical Analysis of Solomon’s “A Time for Everything” (Ecclesiastes 3)
Ecclesiastes by King Solomon highlights that there is an absolute truth and therefore a right time for everything. It validates the human experience- sadness, joy, grief, and anger- while serving as a reminder that the universe works circularly through divinity (LD, 2021). Ecclesiastes serves as both a form of comfort and reprimanding for believers to trust in God’s plan and rejoice in the meaninglessness of life. As one of the most famous excerpts, the aim of this essay is to identify and discuss features of rhetoric Solomon uses in Ecclesiastes 3: “A Time for Everything” that makes it so persuasive and compelling to its audience.
The excerpt begins with the first verse
…show more content…
By the end of the passage, the trusting reader has been primed and is anticipating a verdict to the question, “What now?” Thus, the author is able to break the previous and rather rigid structure of parallelism and shift to a more candid tone. The author engages in subtle positive self-presentation when he speaks in the first person. He begins “I have seen the burden God has laid...”10. Solomon carefully earns the audience’s trust through his position of observation rather than moral superiority when he claims he can only “say to [him]self” in verse 17 what he “saw” in verse 16. Contrastingly, in a vehement negative other-presentation in verse 18, he insists that when tested by God, humans show their true colors and are “like the animals” with the “same fate that awaits them”19. He emphasizes that he too is a sinner, and it is only his insight that makes him credible. The audience can relate because just like Solomon, they find discomfort in the question “Who rises upward?21” Through ‘degrading’ himself, Solomon normalizes the human experience, and he effectively reinforces his position because he has a shining factor
Job declares this after Eliphaz has accused him of being wicked a second time. Eliphaz believes Job is not as wise as he appears, since he limits his wisdom to himself and does not listen to the wisdom of others. Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar have already accused Job of being wicked in the first cycle of speeches, and now the second cycle in “The Great Debate” has begun. Nevertheless, Job responds to Eliphaz’s accusations by calling his friends “sorry comforters” (Job 16:2) and declaring that his “friends are my scoffers” (Job 16:20). Job continues in his speech testifying that, although he is being accused of being wicked, his “prayer is pure” (Job 16:17), and he has not done any wrong.
Alex Gibney, Ophelia Harutyunyan, and Suzanne Hillinger, in their documentary Totally Under Control, analyze the U.S government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. To highlight the failure of the US government to address the uprising pandemic, Gibney, Harutyunyan, and Hillinger use comparison and contrast, casual relationship, and visual representation. They adopt a serious and pragmatic tone in their documentary, as they appeal to their global audience’s logic and establish their credibility to explain the U.S government’s shortcomings to address the uprising pandemic and the reasoning behind much of it. Comparison and contrast is used throughout Totally Under Control, as the directors draw parallels between Korea and America’s responses
Throughout the manifesto, “Time Ain’t Money”, by Douglas Rushkoff, deliberately creates a persona that is straightforward to address the views of CEO’s, and how they run their companies. Rushkoff designed this essay with specific sections intentional written in a certain order to communicate his message clearly. Throughout these ideas Rushkoff creates a key term to further express his idea. In the essay, Rushkoff uses a word, “presentism”, which he made up to describe the process of how, “society is focused on the now over the past, and even the future” (Rushkoff 114). In the essay, “Time Ain’t Money”, Rushkoff uses examples to show presentisms authority on culture change.
A Not so Modest Proposal Well known, political analyst, Jonathan Swift, in his persuasive writing, “ a Modest Proposal”, coaxed for the proposition of making children of poor families be deemed beneficial by selling them as food to rich families during the Irish famine. Swift’s purpose is to enlighten the Irish and their government about the substantial poverty level through sardonic satire. He adopts a facetious tone in order to shock the readers with disturbing and morally untenable positions to reach the attention to the Irish government about the living conditions in Dublin. Swift begins his persuasive proposal by analyzing that the environment in Dublin is permeated with those living in a deplorable state.
Martin Luther Kings introduction in "We Cant Wait" shows the reality of social life for blacks, revealing the hash truth, and then pushing the black community to rise up in nonviolent oppression. King uses to anecdote, didactic, and emotional appeal to strengthen the influence of his cause and combat the injustice this world has come to know. Martin Luther king uses anecdote in his writing to show how a brief story can be used to represent a greater meaning. By giving the short story of a small boy from Harlem and a girl from Birmingham, it reveals how although they might be thousands of miles apart, they are experiencing the same persecution and degradation because of their skin color. They both question "Why does misery constantly haunt the negro?"
There are many things that we associate ourselves with, or that we like having. A lot of us like clothes. A lot of clothes. A variety of clothes that we can wear to match however we are feeling. Oftentimes, the fabrics we wear or possess mean something to us, whether they are from someone special or passed down through generations.
Aldous Huxley’s text, Brave New World, will leave you questioning your perspective on life and it’s choices. Within the novel, curious readers can see that government control over all in an attempt to create a utopia, can sometimes have a counter effect, creating a dystopia. Wielding it’s tool of conformity, The World State has forced its ideology into the minds of its people at a young age, in hopes of avoiding rebellion. In many ways this is how our society functions in the real world. The genre of Huxley's text may be fiction, but the society fabricated in Brave New World may not be so fictional after all.
Ronald Reagan delivered the speech ‘A Time For Choosing” or more widely known as “The Speech” on October 27, 1964. This speech was presented during the 1964 U.S. presidential election campaign by future president Ronald Reagan on behalf of Republican candidate Barry Goldwater. To this day, “The Time For Choosing” or more likely known as, "The Speech" is considered one of the most effective ever made on behalf of a candidate. Nevertheless, Barry Goldwater lost the election by one of the largest margins in history. This event catapulted Reagan to national fame this speech he gave on behalf of the Republican candidate for president in 1964, Barry Goldwater, whose career as a national politician ended with that race.
According to Merriam-Webster, the definition of obsolete is no longer in use or no longer useful often referred as old fashioned. The term obsolete happens to be misunderstood when it comes certain given situations especially when it comes to deciding whether or not a person will still be a use in society. In the episode “The Obsolete Man”, directed by Rod Serling, gave life to a completely different dimension where its state’s government was an example of totalitarian and fails to recognize the rights of man, acknowledge the worth and dignity of man altogether. The director does an excellent job of utilizing rhetorical devices such as pathos, ethos, and logos to create a window effect to give his audience of what their future could be.
Rhetorical Analysis of Remember the Titans In the movie Remember the Titans, Coach Boone states, that his players need to be unified together as a team, instead of being separated because of the color of their skin. He does this by using allusion, diction, and a rhetorical question. Boone uses a rhetorical question in line one when he states, “Anybody know what this place is?”
During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. fought to end racism through peaceful protesting. He points this out in his speeches and more specifically in his book Stride Towards Freedom. King is trying to persuade his audience to act with nonviolent resistance in order to make a change. To persuade his audience he describes acquiescence, violence, and nonviolent resistance: these are the three ways of dealing with oppression. As he describes these three ways of dealing with oppression, he also uses them to highlight rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and logos.
Vargas 5 Ronald Reagan: America’s Leading Man Ronald Reagan, only movie actor to become president, was recognized for his conservative republicanism, fervent anticommunism, policies contributing to demise of the Soviet Union, appealing personal style, skilled as an orator which earned him the title “Great Communicator.” (Britannica) However, Reagan didn’t get this recognition easily, he worked really hard to get to there. Reagan got his start in politics in a televised 1964 address.
“Terrible Things” is a powerful allegory that tells a tale to warn the readers about the Holocaust. Eve Bunting writes this story using forest animals to not only convey the horrors of the Holocaust but also to depict the consequences of inaction in the face of oppression. Throughout the story, the events that occur and the animals’ reactions reflect and symbolize what happened during the Holocaust. Firstly, the birds were taken, and “now there were no birds to sing in the clearing. But life went on almost as before.
On June 2th, 2007, the world was changed forever. Steve Jobs had just released the very first iPhone, while the average business man was clicking away on their Blackberry’s; unaware of how our daily lives would change. In the Aldous Huxley novel Brave New World, the society is the embodiment of the word unaware. Unable to process their own thought or feeling, they live a blissful life of vacations and sexual desire. They pop a drug called Soma, which pulls each civilian away from their surroundings and puts them in a stream of happiness.
Rhetorical Analysis on Race to Nowhere The text being analyzed is a film called “Race to Nowhere” by Jessica Congdon and Vicki Abeles. In this film, the directors talk about the stress and pressure placed on students to do well and to succeed in today’s educational system. There are multiple speakers in this film including students, teachers, and parents.