After the capture of Abdullah Ocalan in 1999, the PKK retreated to the mountains in order to restructure and reform their political organization. This tim of reconstruction centered primarily on the hierarchical structures within the PKK and the clarification of ideologies. The new dogma of the PKK was then circulated and put into writing with the KCK-agreement (Posch 88). Within this writing, it is made evident that the PKK’s ideologies revolve around the ideas of communism and authoritarianism. After the reformation period, the PKK took on a new stance against capitalism. Within the KCK-agreement, Ocalan states that communism is an alternative to “globalized imperialism” (Posch 91). Ocala defines his idea for the future economy as a communal economy where wealth will be redistributed throughout society. Additionally, he claims that will help prevent “status diversity” within the new Kurdish state (Posch 92). Ocala wishes to remove the form of capitalism entirely from his “idealized state," because he believes this only …show more content…
Within the agreement, Ocalan states that a representative democracy benefits the national bourgeoisie, but the general public will not receive freedom and justice through this form of government (Posch 94). Ocalan hypothesizes a new form of “collective democracy”. Within this form of government, all participants would be required to adhere to the values and ideologies of the KCK-agreement and embrace it. In addition to this, he wishes to create a large confereration within the Middle East, which will be a collective “people’s democracy” (Posch 95). The political views within the KCK-agreement draw a strong similarity to Soviet-style authoritarianism. Ocalan also claims that his beliefs on the future government are the correct path for the Kurds, and the other Kurdish political organizations only have the interest of the Turkish government
A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it, does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism” (Basler,
The book illustrated the many casualties that resulted and destruction of democracies in these countries. The story also provides a better understanding of our current political dilemma and what goes into the minds of the U. S. government, how it is shaped and how it is shaping us. In spite of their cold blooded operation, their anti-communism, and the combination of religion
Republic of Fear by Kanan Makiya In ‘Republic of Fear’ by Kanan Makiya, the author’s main argument is that Iraq under the Ba’th regime was corrupt and violent. The regime used violence to legitimize their rule and the concepts of the violence came from within the party. The author also explains how Saddam Husain copied the actions of many other powerful leaders before him. The shock value of this book leaves a lasting impression on the reader, but there are some flaws in regards to how students should look at this book from a scholarly perspective, most notably the bias against the Ba’th regime.
On the one hand, the author writes of, “[believing] that the federal government is responsible and obligated to give every man employment or a guaranteed income” (The Black Panther Platform: “What We Want, What We Believe”), an inherently communist idea of direct government support. On the other hand, they cite that “it is their duty (the Black community) to throw off such government” (The Black Panther Platform: “What We Want, What We Believe). This contradiction is an indisputable incompatibility of two very different doctrines. One cannot gain the support of a government whilst simultaneously proposing violent ideological opposition to it. Also, capitalism which suggests the need for privatization of funds and no direct government intervention would be completely flipping toward communism if it were to support public aid and support of cooperatives.
Historian George F. Kennan maintains that the ideology and circumstances of the Soviet Union were accountable for the political nature of this communist state. Kennan discusses a distinct pattern of thought and concepts to describe the Soviet Union 's position on capitalism and motivation for their conduct. Kennan understands Russian History to be a significant influence in the nature of the Soviet Union 's conduct and discusses a clear hostility towards capitalism. Capitalism was perceived as a destructive and unjust ideology. It exploited the working class, failed to produce adequate resources and created uneven economic and social distributions.
Some would like to argue that it was actually his Hussein’s realization that such power existed that corrupted him. They think that he wishes to return Iraq to a historical age of glory. But the real history that is important is that of the beginning of his life. In the essay Bowden recounts an interview with a journalist named Saad al-Bazzaz in which al-Bazzaz discusses the root of all of this evil.
The documents prefers a Republican Democracy over a Pure Democracy: From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure
“Ideology is a specious way of relating to the world. It offers human beings the illusion of an identity, of dignity, and of morality while making it easier for them to part with them… It is a veil behind which human beings can hide their own ‘fallen existence’, their trivialization, and their adaptation to the status quo.” The ideology and its slogans are meant to be not only the signs if the regime but also its assurance to unite people in one order and keep them in this way. The metaphysical order ensures the system to exists in a
As a former leader of the free world, President Obama evidences and clarifies the benefits and defining qualities of a democracy that encourages for the formation of more democratic forms of government. “Governments that respect the rights of their citizens and abide by the rule of law do better, grow faster, draw more investment than those who don’t” (President Obama). This respect not only establishes a peaceful relationship between the government and its people but also allows freedom to reign. This analysis of the effects of democracy on human rights is necessary, for it is quite evident that in authorities and monarchies these same freedoms are not granted.
Introduction The hope for this research essay is to try to implement and understand the role of democracy in the case of the Korean War. This research essay will look in depth to see if democracy can truly prevent war and bring peace or if it is irrelevant in what causes war in the international realm. This concept is also known as the Democratic Peace Theory. The Democratic Peace Theory is probably the most popular theme or theory in trying to understand what causes war and what causes peace.
Anderson and Stanfield in their book “The Future of Iraq” give three options for the United States in Iraq: First option is “a short-term occupation” which is called “Democracy lite”. This option aims to “establish a functioning democratic system” then pulling out. the authors argue that “Reaching agreement among Iraq’s various groups on the design of democratic institutions is, in itself, a major challenge, and the U.S. cannot avoid playing an important but intrusive role in the process “. This option will not work since there are three groups in Iraq (Sunni, Shi’a and Kurds). Kurds want “a Kurdish autonomous region”, Sunni fear the Shia majority in which they will spread Shia Islam in all over the region, and Shi’a do not believe in democracy.
Saddam Hussein has been regarded for centuries as a lethal dictator that led Iraq into the despair and poverty we see today. However, despite his dictatorial methods of leading his country, Hussein accomplished some astonishing heights for his beloved country; heights that were destroyed by the American invasion in 2001. Now, it seems that the question on everyone’s lips is; “Was Iraq better before or after the American invasion?” Many would argue ‘after’ indefinitely, however, many Iraqi citizens are more inclined to believe that their country was better off under the rule of Saddam Hussein. Despite his predominately Ba’thist ideology and nationalist approach to leadership, Hussein never exploited his own people.
Marxism consists of Karl Marx’s economic, political and social theories that aim to eliminate class structures, brought upon by capitalism, through revolutionary movements. Marxism proposes completely eradicating capitalism by establishing a dictatorship by the proletariat that will inevitably lead to a self-governing classless society. Marxism became increasingly popular in Colombia during the twentieth century, when social inequality, foreign domination and poverty issues that Marxism sought to solve were persisting problems that a large fraction of the population endured on a daily basis. The revolutionary nature of Marxism prompted the creation of insurrectionist groups known as guerrillas in various of the countries in Latin America. Even
The reason being is that democracy is believed to “encourage inclusive growth”, “double down on the rule of law” and spread out the power of the ruling class. While the promise of democracy created an exciting period for the transitioning institutions, the movement has
Political violence and also terrorism is generated from ‘social structural stains’ that are caused by the lack of legitimacy by those who are in power (Gupta, 24). Social movements take place when state authorities are not able to provide public goods, such as, the protection from poverty, corruption, and the inability to protect citizens from threats, thus causes social unrest (Gupta, 25). Overtime, a population gains a sense of injustice, and even humiliation that creates social and political instability that creates political violence. When societies oppose illegitimate authorities and/or government actors, they can use political violence as a morally legitimate form of resistance to achieve political