Analyse the impact on Aboriginal peoples human rights from government
strategies implemented in both the 20th century and today
Throughout Australia’s precious history, there has always been illogical discrimination against
Aboriginals which continue to affect them both physically and emotionally. The modern,
Australian Government, has attempted to address the perpetual inequality and curb the
continual discrimination against Indigenous people by implementing various programs and
policies. During the 20 th century, the Australian government formed policies and programs to
direct the lifestyle of Indigenous people as non-indigenous people discriminated them as
‘unintelligent beings and uncivilised’. But recently in the early 21 st century,
…show more content…
Human rights have improved ever since but there is continual racism and some human rights
issues that have yet to be solved. Hence, while there is an increasing dichotomy between
Indigenous human rights in the 20th and 21st centuries, some similarities still remain.
The 1900’s for Indigenous people was a loathsome moment in Australian history. During the
20 th century, the Federal government adopted the Protection, Assimilation, Integration and
…show more content…
These bus rides led to great awareness of racism in society and created campaigns
like ‘Vote Yes’ referendum for wage equality for pastoral workers and land rights. 3 Cases
involving Aboriginal’s land rights often leads to the Mabo case and the Native Title Act. The
Native Title Act’s purpose is to recognise the ‘existing land rights of all owners of freehold
property, and land rights also for many people who held pastoral or other leases.’ There have
been many arguments about the Native Title Act ever since, resulting Prime Minister John
Howard to put forward a ‘ten-point plan’ to resolve the disturbed minority. From this period of
change, it is perceived that progress of Indigenous people’s voices are being acknowledged by
society and the Australian government, thus showing a sign that the government could
implement more policies to stop discrimination against Aborigines.
In the 21 st century, the Australian government has recognised their long mistake and has
become more active to solve the disparity in living standards and cultures between Aboriginals
and non-Aboriginal people. Evidence of this includes the Sorry speech by Kevin Rudd, the
Closing the Gap report, Aboriginal’s cultural celebrations shared openly (NAIDOC
This affects contemporary issues because it was only in 1992 with Australia’s “Mabo” case that Indigenous
After 10 long years Torres Strait Islander Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo has lead indigenous Australians to a victory over the Queensland government. This win this case is a historical moment, as of yesterday, the indigenous Australians have been recognised as the owners of Murray Island. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are known to have resided in Australia, 40,000 to 60,000 years before the British arrived in 1788. When the British took over they decided to take all the land for themselves even though the indigenous Australians were here first. This court case recognises indigenous Australians unique connection to the land and acknowledges that they have the rights to the land.
Roger Williams, once a prominent member of the Puritans in Massachusetts, and the other Puritan leaders acted very differently towards the Indians. He became a confirmed Separatist. He came up with the idea of separation of church and state. He also believed the Indians had rights, as they were the original inhabitants of the land.
[9] The authors contend that the Australian Constitution has historically been used to marginalize Indigenous Australians and that any attempts at constitutional change must be cognizant of this history. The authors argue that the current constitutional framework in Australia needs to be revised to address Indigenous issues, particularly concerning the recognition of Indigenous rights and the participation of Indigenous Australians in the political process. They contend that a First Nations Voice to Parliament and a Makarrata Commission are essential components of constitutional change in Australia. They would provide a framework for Indigenous self-determination and recognizing Indigenous
The speech was made as the prime minister had some concerns about the daily challenges that the Indigenous people had to tackle. It was made to capture the harsh truths about Australian history, and to use them as a beginning for building trust in the government’s motives among Indigenous Australians. The speech was created not only to help those Indigenous to help the civil rights movement but also to challenge what it would be like if those average white Australians experienced such injustices. It had been an historical event because it was the first time an Australian Prime minister had widely spoken about Indigenous discriminations that they have or had been experiencing. “Recognition that it was we who did the dispossessing.
RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS CAT THE BRINGING THEM HOME REPORT WAS A SIGNIFICANT EVENT FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PEOPLES. The ‘Bringing Them Home Report’ was a significant event for the civil rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, as what they experienced between 1910 to 1970 was something no human being should have to go through, The Stolen Generations suffered a great deal of traumatic experiences. On 11 of May 1995 change, had to take place as this wasn’t a lifestyle a human being should live, the inquiry period began for The Bringing Them Home Report.
More commoners in addition had expanded in to the southwestern lands after the Mexican-American War because of inexpensive land, during the time Mexicans had supervised the wide area of the Southwest conserving their chapels and ranches, Americans shortly ordained the Mexicans out of the Region nonetheless those who remained adjusted to the Anglo society. Planters won lands from Mexicans and began Discriminating, by responding Mexicans retaliated by assaulting American cliques, Mexican Americans in California Encountered situations equivalent to those in the south and west. Native American had also faced Prejudice by Anglo Americans. (Doc B) As the numbers duplicated laws were Passed that made titles of Possession problematic for the locals escalation rose in the late
Between 1937 and 1965, it would be rare to see every Aboriginal person truly express his or her happiness. Although there were improvements to some Aborigines’ lives, the Policy of Assimilation did not ameliorate the lives of most Aboriginal Australians between 1937 and 1965. The assimilation policy conveys the idea of white superiority and black inferiority, manifesting racial inequality and discrimination against Aboriginal Australians. Assimilation policies prompted the forcible removal of Aboriginal children, decreased and oppressed the Aboriginal population and their culture and Aborigines had lacking rights to citizenship. The negative impacts evidently preponderate the positives (if any).
As we look throughout history, governments have implemented policies and are partially responsible for the denial of human rights to a certain group. These groups include Ukrainians and Rwandans. The denial of human rights in these regions not only affect those in the region but internationally. Both Ukrainians and Rwandans were denied their human rights. Ukraine’s hope and will was in the hands of the dictator Joseph Stalin.
Native title ’Native title’ refers to the recognition that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (ATSI) have rights to their traditional lands. For many years, native title has been an on-going topic across Australia, with many people disliking the concept. However, due to Australia’s changing social values and new concepts of justice, it has now been recently addressed. It is through the legal mechanisms such as the ALRC, the NSWLRC, the parliament and the courts and the non legal mechanism, the media that has been a catalyst for law reform for native title. Such mechanisms, have helped cases like the Mabo v Queensland [1988]
This issues paper will discuss the Northern Territory Intervention; how it has greatly affected Aboriginal peoples and communities; and how it is contrary to various international Human Rights standards and principles, as well as being discriminatory in nature. It is important to note the role and obligations of social workers in understanding the Government’s intention and policies, the impact of policies on peoples and communities and the consequences of significant policy change. It is a social workers’ obligation to aim for social justice, respect and equality in society including supporting issues that assist both individuals and communities, advocating for change where appropriate, and arguing against social disadvantage. There have
This article discusses the speech given by an Indigenous journalist, Stan Grant who participated in a debate where he spoke for the motion “Racism is destroying the Australian Dream’’. Hence, the main points of this article are mostly evidence given by Grant in his debate to support his idea that the Australian Dream is indeed rooted in racism. One of the main points is that the indigenous Australians are often excluded and disregarded as non-Australians simply due to their race and skin colour. Grant pointed out the incident where AFL player Adam Goodes was publicly jeered and told that he did not belong to his country as he was not an Australian despite the fact that Australia indeed is the land of his ancestors.
This sudden change still has an enormous effect on today’s Indigenous population. How is it fair that the oldest population of people die a decade younger than non-Indigenous Australians? The perpetuation of racism which is manifested in our society has left many Indigenous Australians in a disadvantaged position. Including through, limited access to education with adult literacy rates of just 30 percent and literacy rates of children under 15 more than 48 percent lower than non-Indigenous Australians, consequently means lower educational achievement rates and higher unemployment rates of 17.2 percent compared to 5.5 percent for non-Indigenous Australians (Australian Bureau of Statistics , 2013 ). These facts must be recognised to ensure real equality and a fair-go for Indigenous people.
It is during this time that Hasluck established and executed the Commonwealth’s Assimilation Policy with regard to Aboriginal People . As Minister, Hasluck continuously argued that the issues being faced by Aboriginal people needed to be viewed as a ‘social’ problem rather than a ‘racial’ issue. Hasluck believed that if Aboriginal people where to be seen and treated, as equals there must be a shift in ‘White’ mentalities
Can you imagine being a child that has been forced to grow up without the loving care and influence of their mother and father? We as a nation need to recognise what we did wrong, and make it right. We need to find a way to live together in harmony with the rightful owners of this land, and restore the sense of community, responsibility, freedom, and love in the Aboriginal