Sometimes they want the child and just can 't have the child because if could kill them or affect their health and the babies (pause). When it comes to teen pregnancy it 's very hard to give a child up for adoption so they feel abortion would be a better answer (pause). Sometimes the girl is just too young and her parents won 't support her (pause). A woman needs to have a choice in what they want to do with their body because at the end of the day it 's the woman 's body, the woman 's life, and the woman 's
He wants to be a good person and the only way to do so, in his mind, is to stay true to his faith. However, he has already sinned by getting is girlfriend is pregnant and considering abortion. He thinks that if he tells Sheri
For example, many pro life people would say that if a woman doesn’t want the responsibility of raising a child, they should just put it up for adoption (1). This is not necessarily a fair accusation considering that not all women who want an abortion want it because they don’t want the responsibility. Having a child can be extremely expensive, even if you are not planning to keep the child. While pregnant, women have to make multiple trips to the doctor to make sure their pregnancy is going well. Also, the hospital bill for giving birth can be in the thousands of dollars by itself (1).
Unfortunately, many women are not aware of the consequences and how harmful they can be. Even if abortion is legal in many countries women still may suffer after their surgeries. Post-abortion problems may go on for years after an abortion has been performed. The effects of abortion include many psychological effects,health issues and emotional disturbances. The psychological aspects
She then goes to her boyfriend for his opinion since it is his baby too. He tells her he is not ready for a child and that she needs to have an abortion. She has two people telling her two completely different things, so she doesn’t know what to do. Even though there are pressures to have an abortion women should not because it is inhumane, harmful to the mother, and harmful to the baby. First off,
This applies to their right to seek and get safe abortions. Currently many states across the United States pose restrictions upon abortion that makes it very difficult and virtually impossible for certain women to get them. Acknowledging the fact that all restrictions can’t be lifted, restrictions that hinder the rights of women and are irrational should be lifted. These restrictions include the gestational limits, public funding, coverage by insurance and refusal. These restrictions should be lifted because it infringes the rights of women.
An ethical egoist would be in favor of an abortion in this woman’s case because she might not be able to meet the needs of this new baby, he might not be in good health, and she might not be able to provide him with the comfort, love, and assistance he requires. Since her financial situation is bad, giving birth to a new baby would impose on her more financial constraints. Her two children face health issues, and this new baby might also face health issues. Her relationship with her husband is bad and the children might face psychological and emotional problems due to domestic violence. In case, she ever opts to leave her husband, running away with two children is easier than leaving with three
Some believe that the virus that is being vaccinated against is alive in the vaccines, while others just have personal beliefs. Parents will let their unvaccinated child be treated for a brain infection, that was caused by a preventable disease, with weeks of IV antibiotics, yet still say no to vaccinations. If a parent did not provide their child with the right medical attention for a broken bone, child protective services would most likely apprehend the child and the parent could be charged with negligence. Many people have double standards when it comes to vaccinations and medical treatment. There is a very common misconception that vaccinations are optional.
In a pro-choice case, the mother’s intention is to not solely get pregnant and abort a growing fetus. It is not morally acceptable with aborting a twenty eight week old fetus in her eyes by means of basically dissecting it to pull it out of the womb. However, the mother of the child does not wish for this, but the mother may simply have an ethical view that her rights are of greater importance than that of a fetus. Therefore, this case of foreseeing someone’s death by a means of indirect killing is morally permissible while a case in which a means of direct killing is not permissible. I propose the bases of my claims to be that there is no exact specific distinction whether ones intentions are morally permissible solely by the individual’s actions on the case in thus, will alter with the given morality that a fetus does or does not have a right to human
Others believe that no child should come into this world unwanted. Nonetheless, these mothers don’t understand the extent to which an abortion can cause them serious and life-threatening physical and psychological damage. Physically, in the first few weeks after the abortion, it can cause diarrhea, vomiting and abdominal pain. But, it can lead to other more dangerous complications like, damage to the cervix, scarring of the uterine lining, perforation of the uterus and if abortion is done during the advanced stage of the pregnancy (i.e. After 4 months) or in unhygienic and unlawful conditions it can lead to death. A woman also faces psychological harm, whether it was done willingly or not.
Whose choice is it? Organizations such as “Planned Parenthood” are telling people that abortions are completely fine for pregnant women to get. There are many “Pro-Life” groups opposed to this program. Abortion is not morally correct because it is unfair to children that do not have a choice, a fetus is still human, and killing humans is murder, and couples can prevent pregnancy with birth control or abstinence. Pro abortionists argue that women should have a choice in whether or not they want a child.