ipl-logo

Absolutism In The 17th And 18th Centuries

638 Words3 Pages

In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries many kings of many different kingdoms ruled in a different way from each other, but as for the information stated in the documents given it seems like Absolutism was most effective for ruling kingdoms and civilizations back in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
Many Rulers during that time period used Absolutism as a form of government to govern their own people. As stated in document one by Niccolo Machiavelli “Any prince,trusting only in their works and having no preparation made, will fall to ruin, for friendships that are bought at a price and not by the greatness and nobility of soul are paid for indeed, but they are not owned and cannot be called upon in in time of need… as men are …show more content…

In document three he states that “the head alone has the right to deliberate and decide, and the functions of the other members consist only carrying out the commands given to them…The interests of the state must come first ”(Doc.3). So fundamentally what he is trying to say is that there should only be one absolute ruler because it is in best interest of the state for the king to have all of the power, he also mentions that he head alone has the right to deliberate and decide and that his servants and his advisors are basically his pawns in a sense because of the fact that “the other members consist only in carrying out the commands given to them…”(Doc.3) In conclusion absolutism is a better and more effective way to rule because of the fact that the people mentioned above were all strong believers of absolutism and they all later became strong and favored kings who had powerful empires and they all reigned for quite a while, except for Niccolo Machiavelli as for he helped guide princes and kings into using absolutism because he was an exceptionally good diplomat, politician historian and humanist and he knew how things worked back

Show More
Related

  • Age Of Absolutism Dbq

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote “The Prince,” telling rulers how they should rule. (Document 1) Many of the ideas in his book are shown in the ways these rulers governed their people. King Louis XIV believed if there were multiple people had power more would take advantage of it (Document 3) which is a major idea from “The Prince,” stating “for love is held by a bond of obligation, which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it.” (Document 1).

    Read More

  • Catherine The Great Absolutism Essay

    1081 Words  | 5 Pages

    Being an absolute ruler was beyond any other ruler and had no limitations to what

    Read More

  • The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.

    Read More

  • The Enlightenment And The Age Of Absolutism

    910 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Age of Absolutism is defined as a time period in Europe in which monarchs gained all of the power and wealth over the state for themselves, expanding the idea of single rule. The Enlightenment, on the other hand, is defined as a movement during the 18th century that rejected traditional social, religious, and political ideas, and introduced a desire to construct governments free of tyranny (or single rule). Document 3, a primary source written by King Louis XIV of France in 1660, is describing the idea of monarchy stating,“ The more you grant . . . [to the assembled people], the more it claims . . . The interest of the state must come first” (Document 3).

    Read More

  • Differences Between Louis Xiv And Peter The Great

    763 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the 1600s and 1700s a new type of monarch emerged known as an absolute ruler. Some of these rulers were Louis XIV, the Fredericks of Prussia, and Peter the Great. These rulers believed that a monarch had a divine right to rule and should only listen to God. All these rulers had characteristics that defined them as absolutists. Louis XIV was constantly at war during his reign which resulted in a powerful army.

    Read More

  • What Features Did The New States Incorporate That Reflected Their Colonial Experience?

    1199 Words  | 5 Pages

    1. The states were required to make new instruments of government when the colonies began to separate from Britain. What were two questions that the states found that they had to answer? -“What did it mean to replace royal authority with institutions based on popular rule?”

    Read More

  • Absolute Monarchies Dbq

    1380 Words  | 6 Pages

    Absolute monarchies had all the power in Europe. Their kingdoms were powerful and accomplished. Although absolute monarchies empowered and enriched their kingdoms, they were still largely detrimental because of King Louis XIV of France, debt, Frederick the Great’s seizure of Silesia, and the city of St. Petersburg. King Louis XIV of France was an absolute monarch.

    Read More

  • Locke Vs Kant

    1255 Words  | 6 Pages

    A regime can be judged by no other criteria nor be assigned any other functions, than those proper to the lawful order as such. " He opposed "democracy," which at his time meant direct democracy, believing that majority rule posed a threat to individual liberty. He stated, "...democracy is, properly speaking, necessarily a despotism, because it establishes an executive power in which 'all ' decide for or even against one who does not agree; that is, 'all, ' who are not quite all, decide, and this is a contradiction of the general will with itself and with freedom." As with most writers at the time, he distinguished three forms of government i.e. democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy with mixed government as the most

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Bossuet And John Locke

    660 Words  | 3 Pages

    Absolute monarchy is rule by one person, usually a King or Queen, who obtains absolute power of authority with no repercussions for what he or she does. Bishop Bossuet held strongly to the argument of absolute monarchy, whereas John Locke opposed on the basis of man's natural rights. Bossuet and Locke have different views on the government’s source of power and their ideas about the rights of the people, but agreed that their chosen theories are in the best interest of the people and held their country's unity in high regard. The first thing we can look at when comparing the two philosophers ideas, is their differences of opinions on the government's source of power.

    Read More

  • Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

    1034 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the early sixteenth century there were two people that wrote about political power and the correct way to rule, both of these people would have great influence on their time period as well as future ones. Machiavelli was a secretary who worked for the Medicis, after the Medici family was expelled from the city he would reflect on what he thought of politics and how he thought they should be by writing The Prince, it would become a very famous book even in the present day. His viewpoint on ruling was that a ruler must do whatever they can in order to improve the state no matter what, or in his words “The ends justify the means”(The Prince). Erasmus was a Dutch intellectual and leader of the Christian humanists who wrote a treatise on political

    Read More

  • Monarchy In Early Modern Europe

    974 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the start of the early-modern period of European history, feudalism was dying, and countries looked to strong, centralized governments for leadership. The popular political theory to address this new development was absolutism. Absolute monarchs reduced the power of nobles in order to consolidate the nation’s leadership under one banner. During the 17th and 18th centuries, Europe’s political landscape was dominated by this form of government. Monarchy was seen by the early modern Europeans as the best form of government for a variety of reasons.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli: The Existence Of Selfish Individualism

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    The contemporary world has been referred to by many names. The modern age is considered to be the age of information or the age of technology. Though these different names do not define the Zeitgeist of today’s world, they all point to main cultural functions that can be observed and seen. The spirit of the times of today’s world is the idea of selfish individualism, or ego. Machiavelli states that human nature is cruel and self-interested.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of Athenian Democracy

    1042 Words  | 5 Pages

    The concept of leadership was prevalent in the ancient world. It had a place in the way the people of ancient times governed their lives. Greece, and especially Athens, is the cradle of democracy in the western civilization. Athens owes the first penal and civil law code to Draco. An outstanding statesman and poet called Solon acted in Athens at the same time as Draco.

    Read More

  • European Monarchs In The 17th And 18th Century

    1080 Words  | 5 Pages

    In addition, they used these mercentalic goals to strengthen their central power through specific strategies in their interests at their home countries. Through passing domestic policies, they strived to assimilate national networks of powerful individuals who would work for the benefit of the state and would then be rewarded with privileges. Abroad, they both tried to expand their territories as means of enhancing their economic benefits, which would eventually add to their centralized political powers at home. The formation of Prussia and Russia, during the seventeenth century, marked a development for the modern Western world as it would later lead to the formation of powerful states. “Absolutism,” was a process by which kings Peter the great and Louis XIV, tried to expand their powers, through ways that

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Absolutism

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    Absolutism was a period of prosperity during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Absolutism is a form of government, a monarchy, in which a monarch has full governmental control. This is different from that of a limited monarch whose power is kept in check by a constitution or other government officials. Absolute monarchs gain their power in one of two ways: being born into a royal family and being in line for the throne or seizing control. Absolutism meant prosperity because monarchs were considered gods (or God 's power on earth), they changed countries for the better, and could be liked by the people for not doing everything in a harsh way.

    Read More

More about Absolutism In The 17th And 18th Centuries

Open Document