Kathrin F. Stranger Hall and David W. Hall are both professors at the University of Georgia. Stranger-Hall teaches biology, which goes hand in hand with Hall who teaches genetics. These two brains together produce intelligent conversation about sexual education. In their article, “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S”, they take a stand against the current abstinence-only based education in America. They provide many statistics as to why the current education is ineffective and a solution on how to fix it. This solution is called “comprehensive” sexual education, which includes “information about contraception [and] safer-sex practices” (1). Comprehensive sex education falls
It is also important that we provide accurate and proven sexual classes to our students. More than 80% of Americans believe that a form of sexual education should be taught in schools.5 The majority of these people believe that this education should be focused on various forms of birth control. Currently the federal government provides funds for these evidence-based types of education through the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative and the Personal Responsibility Education Program. I will support programs that seek to expand funding for programs that teach a variety of birth control methods
In today’s modern society, sex education is seen as one of the seven plagues of Egypt. Let’s face reality, kids as young as 10 years old are having sex. According to the public health data, the chlamydia rate among teenagers have sky rocked by 80 per cent in the past two decades. Is this the result of ignorance or the lack of knowledge? In the article “The Sex Ed Revolution: a portrait of the powerful political bloc that’s waging war on Queen’s Park” by Nicholas Hune-Brown, published in Toronto Life magazine on September, 3, 2015 parents are opposed to the new sex education curriculum for various reasons.
Professor Ross Government 2306 8 February 2015 Is Abstinence-only education the correct approach for Texas? Owning one of the highest rates of teen pregnancies in the Union, Texas has an abstinence only approach in sexual education to try to reduce pregnancies? In addition to this, Texas ranks first as being the top spender in sexual education, but can’t get solidified results out of its spending. Texas doesn’t teach anything about contraception, how the Texas Department of State Health Services has said that the mission of the program is to delay sexual actions among teenagers until they are old enough, and the use of abstinence only education to protect children from explicit content only to find out in their own way leads to curiosity
This major corporation works with educators to provide comprehensive sexual education for schools and programs along with providing affordable healthcare for women all over the nation. Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains provides educators on how to teach sex ed through a program called The Responsible Sex Education Institute. Their goal is stated as, “to empower individuals and communities to make responsible choices regarding their sexuality and sexual health by serving as a source for safe, confidential, unbiased, and accurate information about sex and sexuality. You can rely on the Responsible Sex Education Institute to provide safe, confidential, unbiased, and accurate information.” Planned Parenthood has helped provide comprehensive sexual health and education to clinics, programs, schools and parents all over the nation as well as promoting the regulation of teen sexuality.
In this article Pamela Druckerman makes a point to say that kids in today’s society have questions about sex at early ages and those they deserve correct answers. Druckerman did research about different cultures and their sex education compared and contrasted to the ones we have in the U.S. She believes sex education for the appropriate
Government. The authors, Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall and David W. Hall, of “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S.” discuss how sex education is demonstrated throughout the U.S. and how the government may be a contributor to these alarming rates (2011). They state, “some argue that sex education that covers safe sexual practices, such as condom use, sends a mixed message to students and promotes sexual activity” in describing the U.S. Government’s standpoint on sex education (Stanger-Hall & Hall, 2011, p. 1). They strictly believe that abstinence-only education throughout schools is the answer. Abstinence is restraining one’s self from all forms of sexual activity and choosing to not participate in any sexual acts.
Christianity runs deeply throughout the veins of America’s oldest traditions, whether Americans themselves realize it or not. Christianity can be seen in courtship and the wedding ceremony, but one of the more obscure traditions that Christianity had a say in is childbirth. It was said long ago, menstruation, pregnancy and the pain of childbirth are the punishment for Eve’s Original Sin. Modernly, this explanation is not so much as established as it was before. Now, pregnancy is looked upon as a beautiful and magical thing.
They provide talking points, such as “sexual abstinence until marriage provides numerous health benefits,” and that abstinence programs deter other high risk activities of teens like smoking and drug abuse. The authors also talk about how schools teach risk avoidance when it comes to many other subjects, such as drug use, bullying, or even nutrition. The comparison is that schools do not tell students about different types of alcohol, they teach students to avoid alcohol. The Focus on the Family group feels that sex education should also be about risk avoidance, instead of risk reduction. They even go as far as saying that risk reduction sex education is “taught at a lower standard than all other health topics.”
There are many downsides to each of these teaching methods. Many would argue Abstinence-only programs do not offer knowledge that is critical to one’s sexual coming of age which is key to having a healthy life. One could also argue the Comprehensive Method does not teach moral values of sex and the connections between partners which are key to a healthy relationship. The Balanced Method does the best at dealing with the issues caused by both, but many feel it gives a confusing messages to adolescents. For example, it is like telling a kid, “Do not eat any candy after school” but then putting candy in front of their face tempting them to eat it.
Could there be loopholes in your lifestyle that are putting your health at risk in the long term? Joanna Hall explains how to steer clear of them. For many people, a healthy lifestyle equals eating a healthy diet and getting plenty of exercise. As women, however, there are a number of other things many of us do, or don't, do which can put a dent in our efforts to be the healthiest we can be.
Introduction 1. Attention Getter: The provision of sex education in schools has been a controversial subject matter among different education stakeholders ranging from parents to educators. A focus, however, on the prevalence of adolescents’ abortion, pregnancy, and HIV and AIDS rates indicates significantly high rates.
II. 1st paragraph: Studies done in the University of Georgia show the importance of sex education in a macro scale of just the US, but other research has been done on a micro scale in Memphis, Tennessee that other angles like economics must also be taken into account as to what the consequences are of no sex education or abstinence-only education. A. A
Some people believe that sex education and abstinence-only education will not prevent teen pregnancies, but it can in fact influence them to either refrain from sex before marriage or avoid having unprotected sex. According to a study lead by author Pamela Kohler, “About 25% of teens received abstinence-only education and about two-thirds received comprehensive sex education” (Kohler). Researchers found that teens who received sex education were 60% less likely to get pregnant or to get someone pregnant than those who did not get sex education (HealthDay News). School boards schools consider utilizing sex education and abstinence-only education in schools. It could stop teens from dropping out of school and being in welfare.
We have ever been to the streets and noticed a young woman carrying a baby. It’s such a challenge that the woman is facing, the father of the baby, and probably their parents. I always think what if they got acquired an education about sexuality then maybe they would have made a better decision. In the Philippines, sex education is still a hot debate on whether it will be implemented or not.
There is always a constant debate on whether sex education should be taught in schools or not. Rapid population growth is one of the most critical problems that the Philippines has been facing throughout the years, and sex education is by far seen as the best solution to address the said issue, for its goal is to raise awareness among Filipinos on how to perform safe sex in order to prevent unwanted pregnancies. On the other hand, some parents and religious organizations are not in favor of implementing sex education because they are very convinced into thinking that implementing such curriculum would not only educate the students on how to perform safe sex but would also encourage them to do premarital sex as long as it is safe. But if it’s